4.4 Article

The discrepancy in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications diffusion: 1994-2003-A global pharmaceutical data analysis

Journal

HEALTH POLICY
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 71-78

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.03.005

Keywords

International; Health policy; ADHD; Drug expenditure; Pharmacoeconomics

Funding

  1. National Institute for Mental Health [R01 MH067084]
  2. Center for Child and Youth Policy, University of California, Berkeley
  3. Nicholas C. Petris Center, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this paper was to examine the patterns of spending, price, and the utilization of ADHD medications during the 10-year period, from 1994 to 2003 among 4 different per capita GDP group countries. Methods: This study used the IMS Health database and included both branded and generic ADHD medications. We examined the changes in quantity and price as well as the mixed effects of these changes in the U.S.A. and 3 other groups of countries classified according to their level of per capita GDP. Results: During this study (1994-2003), the U.S. expenditures for ADHD medications increased 594%; sales volume rose by 80%; and price increased by 285%. In other high GDP countries, expenditures increased 493%, sales volume 328%, and price increased by 39%. In the middle GDP countries, expenditures increased 164%, sales volume 141%, and price increased by 9%. In the countries with a lower per capita GDP, expenditures increased 149%, sales volume 464%, however price decreased by 37%. Conclusions: The launch of long-acting ADHD medications has dramatically increased the total medication expenditure in the U.S. as well as in other high GDP markets. In the other countries quantity was the most important growth factor. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available