4.4 Article

Risk Assessment of Slope Failure by Representative Slip Surfaces and Response Surface Function

Journal

KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1783-1792

Publisher

KOREAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-KSCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-2243-6

Keywords

slope failure; response surface function; monte carlo simulation; representative slip surface; limit equilibrium method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274126, 51008167, 51174124]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Costal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology [LP12014]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a quantitative approach for risk evaluation of slope failure based on a finite number of Representative Slip Surfaces (RSS) with Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM). A second order polynomial response surface function (RSF) is calibrated for each RSS in order to improve the computational efficiency. The volume of sliding mass associated with each RSS is a measure of consequence of slope failure along this RSS. The risk of slope failure is evaluated by Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and the contribution of each RSS to risk of slope failure is quantified. Thus, the risk of slope failure is de-aggregated into each RSS. The proposed methodology is illustrated through a three-layer cohesive soil slope. The de-aggregations of probability of slope failure, p(f), and risk of slope failure, R, are conducted at different scale of fluctuations, and the results for de-aggregation of p(f) are compared with those for de-aggregation of R. The comparison indicates that the group of key RSS that dominate p(f) differ considerably from those that dominate R. These different groups of key RSS may lead to different strategies in the subsequent risk mitigation, if any. The proposed approach provides an efficient and quantitative tool for identifying the key group of RSS in the planning of slope risk mitigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available