luyangshi 2023-07-15

The initial review was rejected, and the reason given is that it does not meet the publication standards. I also don't know where the problem occurred.

hepa 2023-03-03

I submitted my first article in 2017, and it was also the first one. It underwent multiple revisions until it was accepted. In January of this year, I wrote a simple article that was accepted within a month. After a month and a half, I received the official acceptance notification. The process was incredibly fast.

行星 2022-10-17

Two questions, 1. Why didn't you ask me for the original data? 2. It's been a week since proof 1, why haven't I received any updates yet?

DrJhaha 2022-08-25

After everyone wins, they should all come and vote. When it's my turn to vote, I'll eat nails. The first article gets rejected pretty quickly during the initial review. The second article is still in the initial review after a week of being submitted.

wang0319 2022-08-22

Dear, how long after being accepted will I receive the proof?

木333 2022-08-20

AE is hard to find, and it is difficult to find reviewers. The overall speed is slow.
Submitted on January 28th, the interactive review was not opened until July 15th, the revised version was uploaded on July 27th, and the rejection notice was not received until August 19th! The reason for rejection is not acceptable.
The speed is far worse than before, feeling mentally exhausted, and the reminders in between were useless!

Xiuxian 2022-08-19

I want to ask, did he ask for a recommendation from the editor and contact the editor's office? Did you handle it? How long did it take to assign the editor in the end?

wenyuxuan 2022-07-21

Posted on June 15th
Reviewed on June 17th
Received two minor revisions on July 4th and July 12th respectively (the reviewers were very friendly)
Submitted revised manuscript on July 16th
Accepted on July 21st

Overall, the review process was very fast, and both the editors and reviewers were very friendly. It is recommended to start revising the manuscript as soon as the first review comments are received to expedite the review process.

dcsdcsd 2022-07-01

We need the raw data and the layout fee is required.
Submit the original data in early March.
In April, after one month of searching, we couldn't find an editorial reviewer. We wrote a withdrawal letter and changed the editor.
In early May, it went for external review. Minor revisions were made by the end of May.
Accepted in early June.
It was difficult to find suitable reviewers.

darmuyu 2022-04-23

May I ask if the editor asked you for the raw data?

dcsdcsd 2022-04-05

It's really slow. The original data upload has been going on for half a month, and there is no movement at all.

dream813 2022-03-30

My part is quick, but with five reviewers, there are many experiments to be added.

IreneH123 2022-03-30

I haven't received any news for almost a week.

richbird 2022-03-22

The first review was actually very fast, taking only half a month. However, there was a conflict of opinions between the two reviewers. It took a long time to invite the third reviewer. After urging for the submission once in the fourth month, I learned about the invitation of the third reviewer. Then I quickly received the third reviewer's acceptance of the comments. Overall, the editors of Frontiers in Pharmacology prioritize innovation and do not have strict requirements on workload. The second reviewer believed that the workload of the manuscript was too low and rejected it by casually mentioning a few shortcomings in innovation. Although there is no requirement to respond to rejection comments, I still wrote an email addressing each of the issues raised by reviewer 2. The editor has a discerning eye and can identify the highlights of the article, not influenced by individual reviewers' opinions, and agreed to accept it. I think the quality of this journal is still very high. Currently, this journal is classified as a top pharmaceutical journal in the Chinese Academy of Sciences, so it is worth submitting to.

nancy333 2022-02-28

May I ask how long after receiving it will the proofreading begin?

nancy333 2022-02-25

How long will it take to receive the proofreading draft after submission?

dddddddd147 2022-02-22

A very complicated paper
Submitted on July 30, 2019
Revised on December 19, 2019
Revised again on January 20, 2020
Second round of review comments on February 4, 2020
Revised again on February 7, 2020
Editor changed in May 2020
Accepted on June 3, 2020
The process was lengthy, which made people wonder if there was any issue
Page fee of $2,999.

密斯特旺2021 2021-12-20

"Need to provide WB raw data."

lily CC 2021-11-03

Hello, may I ask if this journal requires the submission of raw data?

考验再考验 2021-10-09

Already hired, sharing for the reference of future people.

葫芦娃2333 2021-09-30

Excuse me, is there a reference style for this journal? Thank you very much!

葫芦娃2333 2021-09-30

Excuse me, is there a reference style for this journal? Thank you, thank you.

ljl20102629 2021-09-28

You completed the major repairs in less than a month. May I ask if there are any supplementary experiments?

athony 2021-08-22

There may still be unanswered questions, once all questions are answered, you can resubmit it.

考验再考验 2021-05-31

Posted on February 6th, 2021, passed Initial Validation on February 8th, and transferred to Editorial Assignment. Until now, May 31st, 2021, there has been no news. Upon logging in, it shows that it has been assigned to a Handling Editor. Upon checking, the Handling Editor is a postdoctoral fellow who has published several articles during this period. When entering the Go to Review Forum, it displays "No Action Is Required From You." Have you guys ever encountered this situation? It has been nearly four months in the Editorial Assignment phase.

Aisiyah 2021-04-20

Submitted in early December 2020
Major revision completed by the end of January 2021
Revised and approved by three reviewers in mid-February
Accepted by the end of February
Proofreading completed by the end of March
Published online in mid-April
Took more than 4 months.

一抗螺旋杆菌 2021-04-17

Hello, I submitted an article to this magazine and received feedback from the reviewers. After making the necessary revisions, I want to resubmit it. However, they are asking for a response to all the questions raised by the reviewers before I can submit it. Even after replying to all the questions, it keeps prompting that there are still unanswered questions. Have you encountered this situation before?

Herr_Chen 2021-04-16

Mid-January submission
End of January external review begins
End of February, three reviewers' comments returned
End of March, beginning of April, second review completed
Early April, editing and proofreading
April 15th, acceptance
Exactly three months from submission to acceptance. The assigned editor's efficiency was very high. One reviewer made straightforward comments during the first review, while the other two provided minor suggestions for revision. The second review pointed out some detail issues, but after making the necessary revisions, all three reviewers quickly approved. The editing and proofreading stage focused on formatting and writing errors, which were fixed and accepted on the same day. Overall, the submission process went smoothly.

LetPub163 2021-01-29

It has been a month for me too, very annoying, and so slow.