育东 2023-02-28

It's relatively fast, and the content is about nano pesticides.
12.06 Submitted.
12.12 Assigned editor.
12.13 Sent for review (instant review).
1.22 During the Chinese New Year period, four weeks were given for revisions. A reviewer was assigned, major revisions were made. The editor may have felt it was not enough, so another reviewer was assigned. No objections were raised.
2.9 Major revisions completed, sent for second review.
2.24 Minor revisions.
2.25 Minor revisions completed.
2.28 Accepted.
From submission to acceptance, it took three months, which is neither fast nor slow. It was relatively lucky, and the editor, Susana Loureiro, was relatively fast in processing.

Accepted2015 2022-10-08

Brother, don't joke around. You have only been with the editor for 10 days, while I have been with them for four months and haven't received a reply even after sending two follow-up letters.

chenyizhi 2022-09-29

May I ask how long it took for your paper to go from the initial review to the editing stage? It has been 10 days for me... and there has been no progress at all.

青鸡 2022-08-15

I am also this editor, I am really drunk, indeed European people's work efficiency is low, it seems like articles related to nanotoxicology are always assigned to this editor.

ghhiyy 2022-07-29

The first review took a total of four months (including more than 3 months in the "with editor" status, as the editor stated that the reviewers did not submit their comments within the deadline and they had to find new reviewers). The manuscript was given major revisions and it has been 9 days since resubmission, and it is still in the review process. Is everyone here working in the field of toxicology? I was assigned to this editor automatically, and their efficiency is indeed low. All we can do is patiently wait and hope for a positive outcome for everyone.

Calvina 2022-07-23

peer review has changed to with editor for 10 days now, and there has been no progress. It is still the same editor.

皮蛋瘦肉周周 2022-07-18

The review speed is too slow. The assassins in the SCI journal have not reached the hands of the editor since the initial review on July 5th.

皮蛋瘦肉周周 2022-07-15

Is the speed this slow? I just submitted it almost two weeks ago and it's still in the initial review.

风生水起静 2022-07-15

Rejected after submission.
Initial review status for 15 days.
With editor for 15 days.
Rejected, reason not suitable...
It's considered normal, I guess.

向往有你一方 2022-07-01

I am also this editor, it is really too slow...

向往有你一方 2022-06-28

May I ask who your editor is? I submitted mine on May 26, 2022, and it's been with the editor for about a month now, still in progress as of June 28.

向往有你一方 2022-06-28

May I ask who your editor is? I submitted mine on May 26, 2022, and it is still "with editor" as of June 28. The editor is Iseult Lynch from the University of Birmingham, UK. I sincerely do not recommend.

Accepted2015 2022-06-25

Done, I am also this editor.

ghhiyy 2022-06-23

Ah, I am also an editor for this, and it's really slow to a surprising extent. It has already been over three months now, with the status "with editor" possibly lasting for as long as two and a half months. Sending reminders doesn't help either. Each time the attitude is quite good, but there is no progress. It has been almost a month since the last change from "in peer review" to "with editor" status, and there has been no news at all. I wonder what the editor is busy with...

IWantMoreAcceptedPapers 2022-06-06

It took more than 5 months, and I would also like to share the submission process:
December 28, 2021: Submitted
February 22, 2022: Rejected & Resubmitted
March 17, 2022: Resubmitted after modification
May 12, 2022: Major revision
May 28, 2022: Returned after modification
June 4, 2022: Accepted
It feels quite difficult to get accepted, thanks to the editor and reviewers~ I hope the journal continues to improve!

eeeye 2022-03-17

2021.12.2 Submission
2022.2.6 Major overhaul
2022.2.22 Return
2022.3.16 Minor overhaul
2022.3.17 Acceptance
The process took over three months, with most of the time spent on external review. However, the editing process was quite fast.

sxliy 2022-01-24

11.11 Submission
11.22 Editing and allocation
11.24 Submission for review
12.12 First round of review feedback received, given three weeks for major revisions
1.4 Major revisions completed, submission for second round of review
1.24 Acceptance
It took two months from submission to acceptance, which is quite fast.

GG疯狂豆沙包 2022-01-20

The journal has a high quality control, with a small number of articles accepted each year, which is still very good.

eeeye 2022-01-18

It's pretty good. Being able to achieve one is quite impressive.

IWantMoreAcceptedPapers 2022-01-17

I want to ask the experts, what is the quality level of this journal? I noticed that the upgraded version in 2021 is a second-tier journal, not a top journal. Is it really that bad? I have submitted my own contribution, so the feedback should be coming soon.

zhou- 2021-09-01

The first review is a bit slow, taking over two months, and the second review was received half a month after some minor revisions. I submitted several articles, but only one was sent for review. The work needs to be comprehensive and somewhat innovative, otherwise it won't be submitted for review.

402小学渣 2021-07-28

I would like to ask which field you submitted to this journal. I also work in photocatalysis, but I'm not sure which topic to submit to this journal.

duolaaa 2021-04-26

Posted on March 30, 2021.
Delivered to the editor one week later.
Less than a week later, on April 15, 2021, the editor's opinion was rejection.

天问 2021-03-09

I saw that there were not many reviews for this magazine, and coincidentally I just received one recently, so I decided to write about my experience.
Submitted on December 14, 2020.
Received reviewer comments on January 23, 2020. Major revision, minor revision, and rejection were suggested, and the editor requested a major revision.
Revised manuscript was resubmitted on February 9, 2020.
Accepted on February 10, 2020.
This is my first article in this magazine. I had previously submitted a few times without success, so I am quite happy that this time it was accepted. I am very grateful to Weiguo Song, the editor. Feel free to cite "Strategies for enhancing the perylene diimide photocatalytic degradation activity: method, effect factor, and mechanism" (DOI: 10.1039/d0en01245a).