大萌子QAQ 2023-07-09

4.27 submit - Submit on April 27th
7.8 Revise - Revise on July 8th
A reviewer gave 5 suggestions and allowed 7 days for revisions. The suggestions were relatively weak, and they even asked me to cite their own article. The reviewing process is slow.

追风er 2023-05-28

The complete process is as follows:
2023.04.13: submitted to journal
2023.04.16: with editor
2023.04.24: under review
2023.05.13: major revision (8 issues, given 20 days for revision)
2023.05.23: resubmitted
2023.05.28: accepted

redpanda2 2023-05-21

A paper about electrochemical simulation went through four submissions. Initially, it was submitted to JPC Letter but was rejected after three weeks. Then, it was submitted to the Journal of Physical Chemistry C and was rejected after two weeks. It was also submitted to Electrochimica Acta and was rejected after one month. Finally, following the suggestions, it was revised and submitted to EnergyTechnology, undergoing major and minor revisions. The reviewers were meticulous, and the editor was very helpful.

李晓静 2023-05-18

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what you mean by "5.18 with editor." Could you please provide more context or clarify your request?

追风er 2023-05-14

2023.05.13: major revision (Reviewer #2, 7 questions, 20 days given for revision)

k科研废材 2023-05-06

Senior brother, how's it going? What step are you at?

追风er 2023-05-05

2023.0424: under review

追风er 2023-04-24

2023.04.13: 提交给期刊
2023.04.16: 正在编辑中
As of the review deadline (20230.04.24), it is still with the editor, and the processing speed is a bit slow~

shuang123 2023-03-17

May I ask which journal in the third district was later submitted to?

努力科研 2023-03-01

The submission to acceptance process took about 3 months, with one major revision and one minor revision. The journal has a very fast processing speed and high requirements. However, it is a bit unreasonable that the journal's impact factor has remained stable but its ranking in the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has dropped to the fourth tier.

liqiangzhiyao 2023-02-19

This journal has relatively high requirements and rejected my submission after 4 days. However, its ranking in the Chinese Academy of Sciences' division has been decreasing. So, I resubmitted to another journal within the top 3 divisions (with an Impact Factor greater than 5), and it was accepted within two months.

crseven 2023-01-16

Did you submit for review? It took quite a while for my article to go through the manuscript submission step.

GeniusDDD 2022-12-12

It has been 6 days since submission, and it is still a manuscript submission...

GeniusDDD 2022-12-12

Brother, may I ask what the status of your article is now? I just submitted mine as well.

huiminwang 2022-11-24

Hello, may I ask what is the current status of your article?

发高级别论文 2022-10-09

Hello, what is the current status of your article? How long ago did you send it for external review?

Missing1 2022-09-11

My situation is also like this, it has been 6 days.

Wolf.... 2022-08-31

It has been four to five days since submission, and it is still in the status of manuscript submission. Has anyone encountered this situation before? Does it mean there is no chance?

紫璃沐 2022-05-24

So is this the second district or the fourth district?

hfhw 2022-05-23

The journal is very fast, and feedback was provided 20 days after submission. There were two reviewers, one suggesting minor revisions and the other suggesting major revisions. A total of 10 days were given for revisions, and after completing the revisions, the paper was directly accepted for publication one week later. Overall, the editor was very responsible, and the reviewers were also very professional. I hope the journal will continue to improve.

ych 2022-04-05

The journal is fast-paced, and the editors are very responsible. After two rounds of review, they gave ten days for major revisions. After the revisions were made, the paper was accepted directly.

ding_yr 2022-03-26

Posted on March 19, 2022
Rejected on March 25, 2022
The reason was that the journal had too many submissions, and they said there were too many choices, so they rejected me. What bad luck! They even recommended a journal in Zone 3 that costs over 10,000 RMB.

蔚蓝之翼 2022-03-01

I have been reviewing this for almost 20 days, but it is still under consideration. I'm really anxious.

changlijun0814@163.com 2021-12-03

The speed is very fast, only the reviewer is slow, but the editing process is very efficient.
Submitted on 9/1.
Major revision on 10/11.
Revised on 10/30.
On 11/24, two agreed but one reviewer disagreed, so the editor asked for major revision.
Returned on 11/26.
Accepted on 12/3.
The efficiency is fast, and I hope it will continue to improve.

changlijun0814@163.com 2021-11-17

Return for repair on October 30th, still no results as of November 17th, it feels like it's not going well.

lilyya 2021-11-16

11.7大修修回，11.13回信接收 translates to:

"Repair will be completed on November 7th, and the reply will be received on November 13th."

changlijun0814@163.com 2021-11-04

Like the original poster, I also returned it for repair and am waiting for the results.

lilyya 2021-11-04

9.11 submission
10.22 major revision, 2 reviewers, 10 comments, not difficult, need to supplement some experiments. Given 9 days, felt it wasn't enough, applied for additional 7 days, and it was approved.
Currently in the process of revising. Will provide further updates later.

欢欣啊 2021-11-04

After the first trial, I was given ten days to respond, and it took about a week to accept.

拼啦 2021-10-29

This journal has great potential, with fast review speed, responsible editors, and a good impact factor. It has a lot of development potential.