Shawn001 2021-12-12

12.09 minor revisions, returned after modification on the same day, accepted on 12.10. It took a total of four and a half months from submission on 7.29 to acceptance on 12.10, with one major revision and two minor revisions during this period. The major revision was given one month, and the minor revisions were given three weeks each. Due to personal delays during the first two revisions, I only returned the revised manuscript close to the deadline. If I had been more efficient, it would have been possible to complete the process in three months. Overall, the feedback on the EPS (manuscript) was good, with careful and thorough review. It is indeed a well-recognized journal in the third zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Tips: Adding or removing co-authors can be complicated, so it is recommended to determine the number and order of authors before submitting the manuscript.

Shawn001 2021-11-27

7.29 submit; 8.6 under review; 9.15 review completed; 9.19 major revision; 10.17 sent back; 11.04 minor revision; 11.24 sent back; It has been 4 months now, the minor revision was sent back, still waiting for the results. Overall, the reviewing speed of EPS is quite fast, and the raised questions are quite detailed, and the reviewing experts are also quite professional. Hopefully, there will be a good outcome soon. Let's encourage each other.