石头娃 2023-02-19

03-Sep-2022 Post
07-Oct-2022 Major repair
05-Feb-2023 Minor repair
The current result is unknown.

包子 2022-10-18

Hello, I have already been hired, but many times when submitting versions, it says there is a formatting issue. Could I have your contact information to seek further guidance?

tanruohai 2022-08-07

Generally speaking, the reviewers and editors of this journal are very serious. They made three rounds of revisions when I submitted my paper. In addition to the reviewers, the editors also provided some suggestions, ensuring the quality of the article. I hope that the journal will continue to improve in the future.

llcc 2022-04-22

Second review, three months. Hopefully it can be expedited. There are not many journal papers.

llcc 2022-04-21

It took more than three months to receive feedback, and the opinions were mixed. The journal only published 65 articles in a year. Is this impact factor indicating that the journal is declining?

geeyow 2021-12-05

Overall, the editor is very responsible, although the review process is not fast, the quality of the journal articles is still acceptable.

rome123 2021-11-30

5.14 submission
6.25 major overhaul
8.1 minor repair
9.1 reception

!. 2021-03-29

November 21, 2020 - Submitted
December 5, 2020 - Under review
December 17, 2021 - Major revision (Three reviewers. One reviewer recommended rejection, while two recommended minor revisions)
January 30, 2021 - Revisions requested
February 25, 2021 - Minor revisions (One reviewer requested further modifications, while two recommended acceptance without further changes)
March 4, 2021 - Under review
March 26, 2021 - Accepted
Overall, the editorial efficiency is relatively fast, but the speed depends on the reviewers. The journal quality is average, with a stagnant impact factor and a stable rank in the third quartile.