Verified Reviews - Advanced Healthcare Materials
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Fly方大魔王 2023-04-04

The second trial requires the submission of the full raw data, but it has been two weeks and there is still no news.

油焖小龙虾 2023-03-27

It has been almost two months since the second trial.

无畏西东 2023-03-16

After being rejected by AFM, it was resubmitted and sent for review on the same day. After half a month, two revisions were received, and the editor requested a major revision. After one month of editing, a hundred-page response was written, and several experiments were added. The reviewer had no further comments and the article was directly accepted. The journal has a high efficiency and the quality of the published articles is also quite good. Moreover, they have high expectations and hope to continue this trend!

油焖小龙虾 2023-03-11

Vomiting blood, it has been nearly a month and a half for the second review and it is still under review.

糖糖米 2023-03-01

3.1 Received, after the major overhaul of AFM, it was rejected, and the option of transferring it for direct acceptance was given, taking a total of 4 months.

丁香茶 2023-03-01

Wish the host good luck!

丁香茶 2023-03-01

5 days with editor

丁香茶 2023-02-28

May I ask how long does it usually take for AHM to review a submission with an editor? It has been 3 days since I submitted the manuscript.

jeremy7226 2023-02-26

Posted on November 24, 2022,
January 8, 2023, three reviewers requested minor revisions,
Revised on January 30, 2023,
Accepted on February 16, 2023.

糖糖米 2023-02-21

The initial review consisted of two recommendations and one rejection. It is estimated that one of them has already been rejected due to lack of innovation. The editor gave an opportunity for major revisions, but I couldn't convince him. In the second review, he still rejected it.

ray1 2023-02-20

May I ask for the reason why the major revision was rejected? Is it because the requested experiment was not conducted? Or was it because a new reviewer was assigned?

糖糖米 2023-02-19

2022.11.10 Afm submitted
12.4 Major, gave two months. 2 recommendations received, 1 rejected.
2023.1.27 revised
2.20 Afm rejected, decision made to transfer to Ahm and accepted directly, transferred the next day.
With editor.

FeelGoodInc 2023-02-19

To submit a point-to-point response, the revised version will still be sent back to the original reviewer for review.

油焖小龙虾 2023-02-18

When you transferred, were you also asked to respond to the review comments from AFM? And did the email mention that there would be no additional review, and once you have answered, it will be sent back to the original reviewers?

FeelGoodInc 2023-02-17

2022.11.29 submitted (AFM)
2022.12.05 with editor
2022.12.06 under review
2022.12.26 required reviews completed
2023.01.02 transfer offer (AHM), three reviewers given one week to decide whether to transfer, one month to make revisions.
2023.01.05 agree to transfer
2023.01.16 submitted
2023.01.18 under review
2023.02.08 major revision, same reviewers as before, need to conduct a small experiment as additional material.
2023.02.09 submitted
2023.02.17 accept
This is the third submission to SCI, the transfer process went relatively smoothly, taking less than three months in total. Finally, I wish everyone success in publishing.

油焖小龙虾 2023-02-16

How long does it usually take with the editor? The first time I submitted to AFM, there were review comments but it was rejected, and I was asked to resubmit to AHM. AHM said there was no need for additional peer review and to directly respond to AFM's comments. However, it has been a long time since I submitted it and there has been no progress.

油焖小龙虾 2023-02-14

It has been 6 days and the Manuscript is still submitted.

李朔 2023-02-11

Has your submission status changed?

迷鹿南北 2023-02-08

2023.2.1 Submission
2023.2.8 Still Manuscript Submitted, very slow.

啃牛经 2023-01-27

Good luck to the host.

finnhan 2022-10-14

9-17 ask for supporting info: On September 17th, request additional information or documents to support a certain matter or claim.
10-10 resubmitted because some unexpected delay: On October 10th, the request or submission was made again due to an unforeseen delay or issue.
10-14 accept: On October 14th, the request or submission was approved or accepted.

finnhan 2022-10-08

Guess what? Actually, the editorial department asked me to submit two additional files before acceptance, two weeks ago. However, they ended up in the trash bin. The big boss took almost a month, until today, to finally send them to me. I'm truly speechless... Hopefully, I can complete the files tomorrow and get them published as soon as possible. Fingers crossed.

finnhan 2022-09-16

7-13 submitted
8-21 major revision/2 reviewers/top 15%
9-6 submitted again
still waiting for the results

Translation:

7-13 submitted
8-21 major revision/2 reviewers/top 15%
9-6 submitted again
still waiting for the results

还没想好叫啥子 2022-09-13

This journal is really garbage and outrageous. It was transferred from AM on August 25th and a week later it was with the editor. It has been almost 20 days now and it hasn't been reviewed yet.

natureamjacs 2022-09-01

Good luck to the host! !!!!!

科小小 2022-08-13

Wish the host good luck!

李李99 2022-07-26

Congratulations! Good luck! May I ask if the original data needs to be uploaded after the article is received?

李李99 2022-07-26

Congratulations, host! Good luck! May I ask if the host needs to upload the original data after the article is received?

李李99 2022-07-26

The review process is relatively slow.

起名废了好大的劲 2022-07-13

May I ask how the original poster's article is doing? I also transferred my investment to AFM.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More