Verified Reviews - Structural Concrete
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Taylover1989 2023-07-28

The submission was rejected after 8 months, and the reviewer's comments were quite simple. The rejection was straightforward, but it was really difficult to accept after being dragged along by this journal for 8 months. It's better for everyone to build barriers.

邹世卓 2023-07-11

I have been waiting for 10 months. Recently, I just sent a reminder and they said it is still under review. This journal is really slow.

Taylover1989 2023-06-27

Submitted for 7 months, during which I urged the editor 4 times for the manuscript, each time during the review process. I suggest everyone not to choose this journal as there is no time limit for the review process, and some reviewers will endlessly procrastinate.

XaviLee20 2023-04-06

The review process is incredibly slow, I suggest submitting it to another publisher.

Xiaohuatongxue 2022-12-08

2022.3.31 Submission
2022.7.27 Major revision, two review experts, constructive comments
2022.8.31 Revision
2022.11.28 Accepted

linlinda123 2022-11-28

Do you have a template for the paper format, please?

TunDoc 2022-11-28

Last year's investment didn't include any page fees.

哇哈哈哈啊 2022-11-15

May I ask what fees does this journal charge and how much is it approximately?

哇哈哈哈啊 2022-11-15

May I ask what fees this journal requires and how much they are approximately?

二三四五 2022-10-29

Is there a layout fee? How much is it?

搬砖的木木 2022-09-07

The journal under the International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib) has a generally good overall quality of articles. The opinions provided by the reviewers are very fair. I received revision suggestions one month after submitting my manuscript, and after major revisions, I had another round of arguments with the reviewers. Finally, my paper was accepted in March of the second year.

同粥共鸡 2022-07-07

2022.4 Submission, 2022.5 Major revisions requested in the first review, both reviewers' comments were very constructive, 2022.6 Accepted two weeks after resubmission. Is the review process as slow as taking a train?

AFEU 2022-06-14

Slow review, fast rejection. One expert recommended acceptance, while another expert recommended rejection, and then it was rejected.

中一次真难 2022-05-17

It is indeed quite slow, mainly because I sent an email and the editor did not reply. This makes me feel very uncomfortable.

旭日东升1203 2022-04-29

During my master's degree, the second SCI paper was about concrete freeze-thaw direction. The specific process is as follows:
1.17 Submitted for publication
2.12 Received first-round review comments from two reviewers, with a total of 11 suggestions.
2.21 Revised and resubmitted
4.4 Received second-round review comments, with one reviewer agreeing to publish the paper directly and the other pointing out two minor issues. The revised manuscript was returned on the same day.
4.28 Paper accepted.

Lava_DD 2022-04-02

The text translates to: "With the editor, it will be sent to the editorial department first, and only after the editorial department's review will experts be sought for peer review."

kingwangmc 2022-03-31

May I ask if it will be under review shortly after submission?

kingwangmc 2022-03-30

Please provide answers: Is the journal under review after submission?

weichengpeng 2022-01-15

Is it under review after this submission?

xxxt 2021-12-05

Speechless, there is no news. This review has no time limit.

Tunnel Doctor 2021-10-08

07-Jul-2021 Post
27-Aug-2021 Minor Revision
14-Sep-2021 Submit Revised Manuscript
08-Oct-2021 Accepted

xxxt 2021-09-10

So slow, it has been three months and there is still no news.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started