dfghjkla 2023-04-23

This journal is quite mediocre and demanding, haha.

cas-ding 2023-01-09

Since October 26th, it has been in the "editor assigned" status. It has been over two months, but I dare not ask and can only wait silently.

cc果酱呀 2022-12-04

I would like to ask how long it took for you to start the external review process after submitting. It has been 46 days since mine entered the "editor assigned" stage and there has been no progress.

米粥棉花糖 2022-11-15

I am in the same situation as you. After receiving it, the ethical review took one and a half months. Four ethical review reports were issued back and forth. It was a constant struggle. Then the data was reviewed, and it was also a struggle in various ways. In the end, it was rejected. You can download the MESS app to have a look. There are a lot of such problems in it. I do not recommend submitting.

Malatang 2022-10-16

May I ask how long it will take for your revised assignment to be submitted for review?

Malatang 2022-10-14

Friend, may I ask if you have been searching for a proofreader for just one month?

gren 2022-10-09

This magazine has high requirements and requires sufficient innovation to dare to submit. It is not easy to get published, and the review process is quite lengthy.

luckyjiao 2022-10-03

5.6 Submitted
5.27 Editor Assigned
5.30-6.25 Reviewers Assigned
6.26-8.3 Under Review
8.4-9.5 Reviewers Assigned
9.11 Under Review
9.21 Reviews Completed
9.30 Rejected

This is my timeline for reference, oh no, this journal is too slow!!!! If they accept me after being so slow, I will forgive them!

heima168li 2022-08-12

Do you reject the manuscript even after final acceptance?

123qwju 2022-07-20

Very frustrating magazine! After submitting the manuscript, it was quickly reviewed and requested to supplement experiments. After completing the experiments, it took about a month to be accepted and paid the publication fee. Then the frustrating part began. The editor kept asking questions. Because we had sequencing data, they first requested it to be publicly available in a database, as we wanted to continue exploring the data. We uploaded it to GEO and selected to make it public after two years, but the editor disagreed and demanded immediate public access. We had no choice but to make it public. Afterwards, they raised issues with our Western blot (WB) images. Our WB was used to validate the overexpression and knockdown effects of a gene in different human samples, and then exposed on a single membrane. The editor claimed that the intensity difference between the control bands of the two groups was too large and did not accept the results. Human samples naturally have different expressions, and we were only verifying the performance of the vector. We also provided the raw data and detailed explanations, but it was still rejected because of this reason. Dealing with these issues took almost half a year after receiving the response, which was particularly frustrating. It is very unprofessional to accept and charge a publication fee before resolving the problems.

花开莫言 2022-05-09

Posted on February 14th, minor revisions on March 7th, resubmitted on April 3rd, and accepted on May 4th.
The reviewer was very friendly and gave very sensible suggestions. The editor provided minor revisions.