6676brown 2023-02-27

A medical journal that is relatively authoritative and stable in the field of medicine, the peer review process is meticulous, and the review suggestions can provide a direction for further research. The review time varies, depending on how it feels.

Keep07 2023-02-25

MDPI is a relatively good journal, a top-tier publication in the second zone, with certain requirements for the depth and workload of papers. The quality of articles published on the homepage can also be seen. The speed of peer review is relatively fast, averaging a little over a month overall. The reviewers provided many constructive comments and suggestions. Both reviewers suggested adding a few more experiments, but it wasn't too difficult. Overall, I have a positive view of the journal "Nutrients" and look forward to it being classified in an even higher zone.

ZYJ5520 2023-01-19

2022.11.07 Submit
11.08 Review
2023.01.09 Major revision
01.12 Revise
01.16 Accept

王猜猜 2022-12-18

"Requested submission, rejected 2 days later, such efficiency is too fast. They claim to consider comprehensiveness, scientific significance, and novelty..."

doczz 2022-12-09

20221207,投 - 20221209,拒

20221207,投 - 20221209,拒 translates to:

20221207,投 - 20221209,拒

Please note that this text appears to be a date followed by two Chinese characters, "投" and "拒," which do not have a direct English translation.

ZYJ5520 2022-12-07

This is the slowest time I have ever submitted to MDPI.
Submitted on November 7th.
Under review on November 8th.
It's already December 7th, and it's still under review...

Assuming 2022-10-14

Submit for 18 days for repair, accept within four to five days after repair, publish quickly, takes about one month. The reviewer gave a total of 19 questions, all of which were minor issues and easy to answer.

sxp2020025503 2022-09-30

10 days after submission, I received a notice for major revisions, with a total of 18 questions from two reviewers. The questions were all very professional, particularly in areas involving histopathological analysis, which I have not studied before. The reviewers provided very constructive suggestions. After making the major revisions, I received a notice for minor revisions after 5 days, which I made slight changes to. I submitted the revised manuscript and it was accepted on the second day. The process was fast, and the reviewers were very professional.

lab106 2022-09-12

Consider the whole process to be quite fast. After submitting the manuscript, feedback was given in about twenty days, requesting revisions to be completed within ten days. However, the experts mentioned the need for additional experiments and applied for a one-month extension. The editor was also very communicative but only granted a ten-day extension, which caused a tight schedule for revisions. The subsequent revisions mainly involved minor suggestions, and after the editor reviewed them, the manuscript was sent back to the experts. The entire process took two months.

Shynee 2022-08-19

The overall process was quite fast, and the editing was well done.
There were three initial reviewers, and most of them provided positive feedback. They suggested major revisions and added a lot of analysis. It was quite tiring to make all those changes in the span of ten days.
During the second review, there were two comments, and both reviewers were satisfied with the modifications. One reviewer suggested incorporating the supplemental material into the main text and only required minor revisions.
After making the requested changes, the revised manuscript was accepted the next day.
It was a pleasant experience submitting the manuscript.
Received Date: 7 July 2022
Revised Date: 9 August 2022
Accepted Date: 11 August 2022
Published Date: 15 August 2022

gynju 2022-07-20

The journal processing speed is very fast. The manuscript was submitted on June 30th and officially published on July 20th. However, the number of publications is increasing every year.

Kevin Cui 2022-07-18

Return the suggestions for major revisions within one month. There are three reviewers, with one of them providing very positive feedback and not raising any issues. The other two reviewers requested some additional discussion. Complete the revisions according to the requirements within seven days and resubmit. Acceptance should be confirmed within two weeks.

626955357 2022-03-08

The review process is very fast, and overall it is very professional. The impact factor is also maintained well. Currently, the instantaneous nutritional factor is around 6.2 points, and it should be around 6.5 this year. I hope to control the number of articles and make it better and better.