飞雁88 2023-07-28

The journal is currently in the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences with four reviewers. After submission, it takes three months to receive the reviewers' comments for revision. After making the necessary revisions, it undergoes another round of review, and after two months, the revised manuscript receives the reviewers' comments. Three of the reviewers approve the manuscript, while one reviewer provides additional suggestions. After making further revisions, the revised manuscript is accepted within two weeks.

lyyProphet 2023-01-12

Surprisingly, it has been 10 months, but I feel very hopeful about being accepted. I hope you can be successfully hired. It has been 5 months for me now, still under review, so I'll wait a little longer.

学渣的选择 2023-01-05

There is news. It took a whole ten months to review and make revisions. One of the reviewers is from Turkey and asked me to cite his article. The review comments are not very helpful and lack professionalism.

lyyProphet 2022-10-14

Is there any news about the later stage? I have also been waiting for over 2 months and it is still under review. There is no movement at all.

不做舔狗 2022-05-27

The reviewer is too slow. It has been almost four months since the review and there is no news at all. I have previously reviewed two articles by Indian authors for this journal, and they were full of errors. It feels like the editor is not strict enough in quality control. Although the chances of being sent for review after submission should be high, it is slow.