Verified Reviews - Acta Geotechnica
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

米修君君 2023-07-21

May I ask which editor you have chosen to handle the manuscript?

hhu杰 2023-07-19

Let me share my timeline with you.
Submitted on June 17, 2022.
Major revision on February 1, 2023.
Returned for revision on February 24, 2023.
Minor revision on April 2, 2023.
Returned for revision on April 3, 2023.
Accepted on July 17, 2023.
Took 13 months in total.

肖家烽 2023-07-05

First trial took 7 months. It has been 2 months since the second trial, and there is still no news.

baoyd20 2023-06-17

I submitted it in July of last year, and it was sent for repair at the end of November. It was repaired and returned in January, sent for repair again in March, and repaired and returned in April. It is now June, almost a year, and it is still being sent for repair. It is really slow. I don't feel the need to submit it to this journal anymore since it is not a top journal.

xiiinfei 2023-06-09

I applied in September of the 22nd year, and until now, there has been no news at all. I have already graduated, so it doesn't matter anymore.

泸沽湖 2023-06-04

How long does it take to edit and review internally?

太沙基的小跟班 2023-06-02

2022.5.10 submit
2023.4.21 accept
After undergoing major and minor revisions, the first external review process took a slightly longer time, about six months. The reviewers were very serious and responsible, and their professional questions greatly contributed to the improvement of the article. The editorial handling time is usually around one week. It takes about a month to receive acceptance notification online.
The journal has strict requirements, and even minor revisions may require external review.
The journal has a good reputation in the industry and was ranked in the first tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences last year. We look forward to its return to the top tier once again.

毕业毕业就是毕业! 2023-05-15

Everyone for me, I for everyone!
2023.01.02 - submit
2023.05.15 - accept
There were major and minor revisions in between. Even minor revisions were carefully reviewed and considered.
The reviewers were professional and their pointed questions greatly improved the quality of the article.
The editorial department handled the process promptly, without causing much delay, and provided timely RRC (review, revise, and resubmit) and feedback.
The process is for reference only.

DouHua 2023-04-25

I am too... And the review date has only changed twice.

FDD 2023-04-14

I submitted it in October last year, and it is still under external review until now, which is really unreasonable.

小幺哥 2023-04-03

May I ask how the situation is now after changing the time four times?

latvision 2023-03-29

It has been 8 months already, and there is no news at all. I wonder what the editor is busy with.

若谷若渝 2023-03-22

Posted in December 2022,
UR in February 2023, should be external review,
In April 2023, there are no results temporarily.

ABCDD12 2023-03-14

External audit enters the seventh month.

Connor1122 2023-03-11

How long will it take to receive a DOI number after acceptance?

奔跑2020 2023-03-06

Submitted in August 2022
Received major revision comments in December 2022
Revised in January 2023
Received minor revision comments in February 2023
Revised in February 2023
Accepted in February 2023
The reviewer paid great attention to the details of the paper.

提-桶-跑-路 2023-02-24

2022.09.28 Posting
2022.12.27 Repair
2023.02.12 Reception

kydl 2023-02-24

The first change is to submit for review.

ABCDD12 2023-02-20

Posted in early September 22, the UR time has changed four times and is currently undergoing external review. Does this mean that there are more than three reviewers reviewing it?

姑苏寒山寺 2023-02-17

If encountering RRC for several months, just send an email directly to the editor to remind them. It has been tested and proven effective.

帅帅的小宇哥 2023-02-17

My Required Reviews Completed have been 3 months since November 18, 2022. What's going on?

帅帅的小宇哥 2023-02-17

My Required Reviews Completed have been 3 months since it started on 20221118, what's going on?

ethann2100 2023-02-15

Is the opinion about the article itself or about the article's theme not being suitable for this journal?

mmmmcccccc 2023-02-14

However, cbm is still top.

Lava_DD 2023-02-14

Oh, I made a mistake. CBM is actually 29%...

Lava_DD 2023-02-14

The self-citation rate is 20%, even more exaggerated than CBM. This journal is going to gain popularity, and the decrease is self-inflicted...

Chengxin Feng 2023-02-09

The text translates to: "The editorial review in March stated that it was not suitable for this journal, and there were also no review comments."

天使爱美丽 2023-01-15

Has anyone on the floor above me had any updates on their status? Mine has been in RRC status for two months already... Is the editor on vacation?

姑苏寒山寺 2023-01-05

This journal was mistakenly ranked in Zone 1 last year, but its actual strength does not belong to Zone 1. Its high IF is only due to the operation of the Chinese community.

奔跑的肉夹馍 2023-01-05

Does this journal have the status "with editor"? Why is it "under review" from the beginning?

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation