Verified Reviews - Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

xxxt 2023-07-06

I was rejected by ES and JBE. Neither of them were sent for review, so it doesn't seem to be a problem with the manuscripts themselves. It's possible that our research group has submitted too many recently.

guo816 2023-07-03

The editor has not processed yet.

2023-07-02

Is it difficult compared to JSCR, ES, and JBE?

xxxt 2023-07-02

6.30 Revised, edited, reviewed, and submitted for approval.
7.1 Completion of review process.
7.2 Accepted.
It's surprising that Springer's review process is so fast, and even the editors work on weekends.

xxxt 2023-06-26

6.26 Major renovation. The speed is very fast, as if there is no RRC process. Once enough feedback was received, a decision was made immediately.

xxxt 2023-06-25

5.20 - Submitted
5.26 - Under review, need to add a few sentences about conflicts of interest
6.8 - Change in review date

大黄 2023-06-19

My initial feedback has not come back yet. In the process, there has been a change in status once, from "assigned editor" to "under review" on the same day. I don't know what's going on. It has been one and a half months.

顺其自然rock 2023-06-19

After the second round of revisions, it took one week for my status to change from "under review" to "editor assigned". What was the final outcome? How long did it last?

科研闲人 2023-06-19

May I ask how the review status of this journal has changed? Why does it still show "New Submission" after four or five days?

潇洒哥 2023-06-19

Reply "Dahuang"
I don't think it's a difference in opinions. When the revised manuscript is sent back, it should undergo an initial review by the editorial department to primarily check the formatting. If there are no issues, it will proceed to "reviewer assigned," which is when it is sent back to the initial reviewer. Although I made significant revisions in the first round, the reviewer had no objections, and most of the issues were related to formatting. Therefore, it was accepted after being assigned to a reviewer.

顺其自然rock 2023-06-18

After the second review and revision, I was also assigned an editor. May I ask, what was the final outcome, dear expert?

leopard 2023-06-08

Hello! After resubmission, my status also changed from "under review" to "Editor Assigned". May I ask how your article ended up?

大黄 2023-06-05

Brother, what is going on with this "Reviewers Assigned"? Are there conflicting opinions?

Constant14 2023-06-02

May I ask how long it takes for you to accept this submission?

Constant14 2023-06-02

Hello, may I ask about the status of the paper now?

Heddyy 2023-05-23

Hello, can you share the word submission template for the Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering journal?

大黄 2023-05-22

5.11 Submission
5.12 Editor assigned
5.21 Under review
6.5 Reviewers assigned
6.5 Under review
6.22 Major revisions (Two reviewers were found, and their comments were very professional. The article was carefully revised and improved according to their suggestions)
8.1 Revision submitted
8.1 Editor assigned
8.2 Reviewers assigned
8.2 Under review
8.6 Under review

大黄 2023-05-19

Submitted on November 11th
Editor assigned on November 12th
So far

guo816 2023-05-09

How long does the journal New submission take?

Geery 2022-12-17

Submitted on December 4th, returned for format modifications on December 5th, and resubmitted. The status remains as "New submission" until now. Has the editor-in-chief not reviewed the paper yet? And when will it be scheduled for external review?

蜡笔小鑫 2022-12-01

11.11 Major Overhaul Return
11.20 Minor Repair
11.27 Hiring

蜡笔小鑫 2022-12-01

November 11 - resubmit after major repair
November 20 - minor repair
November 22 - submit minor repair
November 27 - receive

蜡笔小鑫 2022-10-15

9.23 Manuscript returned, major revisions required, with a time frame of 3 months for modifications. I feel that there are relatively few submissions in my field to this journal, so the review time is considered normal.

日记本 2022-10-10

After revising the manuscript based on the opinions of the reviewers, they requested a reduction in the number of references. I made the changes and sent it back to them for review (they even mentioned in their email that it could be accepted after the modifications). It has been ten days, and the reviewers have not yet accepted the revised version for the second round of review. The journal's processing speed is too slow, and after completing the review, I will have to wait for another half a month at the editor's end. I hope it can be faster.

蜡笔小鑫 2022-09-23

The reviews for the submission made on June 30th and updated on August 11th have been completed. I initially thought they were finished, but it turns out they are still in the Submissions section up to now.

日记本 2022-07-16

The date was updated to July 13th, and it is still reviewer assignment.

日记本 2022-07-06

It has been a long time, since June 23rd, and there has been no progress.
The number of submissions this year has exceeded one thousand, with a significant increase in submissions.

virtue320 2022-06-02

What's the situation now? How long has this state been going on?

Maxmuse 2022-05-31

How soon will the publication be available after being hired?

Chen 2022-05-06

Fast review speed, the first external review took one month, and a three-month revision period was given (the longest I have ever seen). After the revision was submitted, acceptance was granted within one week.

January 21st: Submission
February 22nd: Revision
May 4th: Accept

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search