ppu4140109 2023-07-11

Translate the following text into English: "In three years, I submitted three articles, and two were accepted. The problem is that this journal is too slow. One article took seven months, and the rejection took five months. The one submitted in July took a whole ten months. The advantage of wearing this journal is that it has a good influence and responsible editors. Most importantly, the reviewers they invite are reliable and won't act maliciously."

江南岸 2023-06-27

Although the submission was rejected, the efficiency from submission to editorial response is relatively high. The given advice is quite clear, and I will still consider this journal for future submissions.

咩小力 2023-06-16

This journal is really slow. It has been two months since submission and there is still no outcome. Including the time spent tinkering with the editor in the beginning, it has been a total of half a year. It's still under review. It's no longer just a matter of being impatient about the paper. With this delay, many things cannot be accomplished for a year.

221997 2023-05-30

2023.01.03-2023.01.17 First submission, the editor provided 9 comments and requested a revision before resubmission.
2023.02.24 Resubmission (Due to the Chinese New Year, the resubmission was delayed, it is advisable for everyone to modify and resubmit as soon as possible).
2023.02.26 With editor.
2023.02.28 Under review.
2023.04.03 Major revision. The editor provided three comments, reviewer 1 provided 17 comments, and reviewer 2 provided 9 comments.
2023.04.17 With editor.
2023.04.24 Under review.
2023.05.23 Required Reviews Completed.
2023.05.23 Minor revision. The editor did not provide any comments, reviewer 1 provided 2 comments, and reviewer 2 provided 1 comment.
2023.05.23 With editor.
2023.05.25 Minor revision. The editor disagreed with one comment from reviewer 1 and proposed their own modification idea.
2023.05.25 With editor.
2023.05.29 Accept.

shuaijunzhang 2023-03-21

Submit a few times, the speed of review is inconsistent, it depends on luck.

咩小力 2023-03-03

It is also rare that your "submitted to journal" and my "with editor" statuses are actually the same. You will eventually be in the "with editor" stage, but it is unclear when the submission will be reviewed. The efficiency of the journal is indeed a bit low.

掌心温暖 2023-03-02

It has been half a month since submission, and it is still "submitted to journal." Is this normal?

咩小力 2023-02-28

It has been a whole month since the manuscript was transferred from another journal to the current one with the editor. Is it normal for this journal to take this long without being sent for review? When would be an appropriate time to follow up or should I just continue waiting?

容熙66 2022-08-13

It is about materials direction, but inside it not only contains analysis of friction performance, but also analysis of mechanical performance. It has been with the editor for a month now, and I wonder if the reviewer is also struggling with whether or not to send it for external review.

zzzzzzzzzilch 2022-08-12

2022.5.11 Submission
2022.5.14 Under review
2022.7.7 Editing and 2 reviewers raised a total of 22 questions, greatly improving the overall structure and content of the article.
2022.7.27 Revisions
2022.8.12 Acceptance

DYCD 2022-08-12

2022-01-11 Submitted.
2022-02-16 Rejected, recommended resubmission, provided 10 questions (unclear image, unclear meaning, need to add content, etc.).
2022-03-08 Resubmitted.
2022-04-09 Under review (editors carefully reviewed for a month before sending for external review).
2022-05-31 Major revision, two reviewers (8+20 questions).
2022-07-02 Received major revision materials (modified over 20 pages of A4 paper).
2022-07-08 Minor revision.
2022-07-29 Accepted.
A prestigious journal with strict requirements and long review time, which has high demands for article writing and innovation. It is a top journal in the field of wear. The reviewers are rigorous and provided many professional and constructive comments or suggestions during the review process.
During the minor revision, the reviewer mentioned: For the next work, make some new contributions to tool wear in high-temperature alloy processing along this line.
Through the process of identifying problems, conducting experiments, testing samples, analyzing and summarizing experimental results, becoming familiar with the content, style, and format of the journal, writing the initial draft, revising, and submitting, I have gradually developed skills in approaching problems from a comprehensive perspective.
The reviewers are likely experienced experts in the same field, and it is an honor to receive their review comments. I am grateful to the journal for providing a broad platform for international communication.

你真可爱呢 2022-08-10

This journal covers a wide range of topics, and the difficulty level for submitting articles varies greatly across different areas. The materials field is relatively simple, while the mechanics field is very difficult.

容熙66 2022-08-08

Hello, I submitted an article to the wear journal in July 2022. It has been nearly a month with the editor. Is this normal? Should I send a reminder?

GOBEAR 2022-07-22

Submitted in early February 2022, accepted in mid-July. About 10 questions were raised in the first review, but the content was affirmed and the review was very meticulous. The review process took a long time, which emphasizes the importance of submitting research papers as early as possible. Let's encourage each other in this regard.

面汤 2022-06-28

The editors and reviewers are very responsible! The first time, I received more than ten suggestions from the editor; after revising and polishing, I resubmitted it, and two weeks later, I received major revisions. Both reviewers were very responsible, with one meticulous reviewer giving more than thirty suggestions. I made serious modifications to the paper according to the reviewers' suggestions and finally received minor revisions, which were accepted directly. It took a total of three months from the first submission to acceptance. Thumbs up to the responsible editors and reviewers of the journal.

科研小白在努力 2022-06-24

Where did you transfer to later?

cauchy 2022-06-18

Two reviewers, one rejection and one major revision. Raised more than 20 questions.

科研小白在努力 2022-06-10

How many reviewers are there? Did all the reviewers reject it?

cauchy 2022-04-27

4.17 submit to journal
4.20 with editor
4.25 under review
.....
The review speed of this journal varies, taking 2-5 months.
Wishing myself good luck.

Doc.fan 2022-02-16

Last year, I submitted an article which was reviewed by two reviewers. Unfortunately, it was rejected due to the unresolved opinion of one of the reviewers. The whole process took three months, which is quite regrettable. The main reason for the rejection was my own stubbornness. I hope that my future articles can be published in this journal! I also wish the journal continued success and improvement!

hu 2022-02-14

2021-6-11/2021-6-28, the editor raised more than 10 questions, refused to proceed, suggested to resubmit.
2021-7-7/2021-7-8, the editor raised a few more questions, did not understand the first set of questions, rejected the submission, suggested to resubmit.
2021-7-12/2021-9-16, submitted for review, two reviewers, 30-40 questions, may require major revisions, rejected the submission, suggested to resubmit.
2021-11-16/2022-2-14, revised and resubmitted, accepted directly (although some issues could not be resolved and the reviewers raised them again, but the editor accepted it directly); decision in process for a whole week, slightly slow efficiency.
It has been a rollercoaster ride, the review process has indeed been long; the editor's direction is aligned with mine, and they raised many questions in the first two rounds, giving multiple opportunities for resubmission; the journal is rigorous, the editor is meticulous, and the questions asked are very detailed; the reviewers are rigorous, essentially polishing the entire manuscript, making my revisions appear in red throughout (handwritten PDF version).

woln 2021-10-20

The editor is very rigorous, serious, and responsible. Their reputation for quality has always been good. Previously, I heard many people say that the review process is relatively long, but this time it only took two months from submission to acceptance, with a minor revision in between. Both the editor and the two reviewers provided comments, so it's possible that I got lucky.

pole 2021-08-24

I have been submitting to Wear since 2015, and I have also published several articles on it so far. Compared to other journals, Wear gives a consistent impression of being serious, responsible, and rigorous. It has high requirements for the depth of research in the field of friction and wear. The acceptance time varies from 3 to 8 months, depending on the speed of the reviewers. However, there is a great advantage in submitting to Wear. The knowledge level of the editors is relatively high, and they are also rigorous and responsible. When encountering malicious reviewers, the editors will strictly review their opinions and encourage you to provide reasonable rebuttal reasons. On average, the time for my articles to be accepted is about 4 to 5 months.

Dr.Eryu 2021-08-04

The reputation of friction is relatively high, but the number of submissions is not many. The biggest feeling is that the editors are very serious. They review their own work before external review, give feedback, and also help modify the titles. They also have high language requirements. Both articles are required to be polished by institutions. There are two reviewers, so the requirements are relatively strict. It is an old-fashioned journal.

jianjianli 2021-06-29

I don't know if this journal is top-ranked, but it is definitely not mediocre. Those who have submitted articles know that the editorial process is very strict. The editors carefully review and provide suggestions for revisions, followed by external review, which can be quite lengthy. In any case, from submission to acceptance, it undergoes a strict evaluation process. The number of articles accepted each year is also not high, with only around 300 in 2020.

poluji 2021-05-22

10.08, 2020 submit; - Submitted on October 8, 2020.
11.02, 2020 require resubmit; - Requires resubmission on November 2, 2020.
11.05, 2020 resubmit; - Resubmitted on November 5, 2020.
12.31, 2020 major revision; - Major revision required by December 31, 2020.
01.15, 2021 revision resubmit; - Revision resubmitted on January 15, 2021.
05.16, 2021 minor revision; - Minor revision required by May 16, 2021.
05.22, 2021 accepte. - Accepted on May 22, 2021.

后面没有路可走 2021-01-08

2020.05.14 Submit
2020.05.22 Resubmission Requested (Editor's suggested modifications)
2020.05.28 With Journal
2020.05.31 Under Review
2020.08.31 Major Revision
2020.09.09 With Journal
2020.10.31 Major Revision
2020.11.18 With Journal
2021.01.07 Major Revision
This journal's review process is too slow. I am in a hurry to graduate, so I need to carefully choose where to submit my work.