小花不是笑话 2023-04-25

25 Apr 2023 Under Review
I hope for a good outcome.

小花不是笑话 2023-04-22

6 Apr 2023 submit
10 Apr 2023 editor invited
22nd still no update, is it too slow?

KneeYu 2023-04-19

12 Apr 2023 submit - Deadline for submission is April 12, 2023.
17 Apr 2023 Editor Invited - Editors are invited by April 17, 2023.

辣条哥 2023-04-18

May I ask which magazines are generally recommended for submission after being rejected?

你好1 2023-03-16

May I ask if your article has been published? How long does it take from the submission of the manuscript to the actual publication?

你好1 2023-03-15

Does anyone know how this journal handles the issue of co-first authorship? Do they recognize co-first authorship?

Francis Sun 2023-02-22

The comments section of LetPub can effectively display the review process of WR, alleviating people's anxiety. Comments are made after the initial submission, hoping to help those who come later!

2022.11.16 submitted to the journal
2022.11.17 editor assigned
2022.11.20 editor assigned
2022.12.4 under review
2022.12.5 under review (date changed)
2022.12.8 under review (date changed)
2022.12.11 under review (date changed)
2022.12.23 under review (date changed)
2022.12.29 with editor
2022.1.6 major revision
2023.1.31 resubmit
2023.2.1 editor invited
2023.2.2 under review
2023.2.4 under review
2023.2.16 with editor
2023.2.22 accepted

There are a total of two reviewers, and the decision to send for review by WR takes two weeks. The time spent with the editor is approximately one week each time.

zzy 2023-02-21

It has been one month since submission, but the status remains "under review". The time has changed 5 times, and I'm getting anxious. What could be the reason?

啷个哩个咚咚锵 2023-02-21

The text translates to: "After 'under review,' it changed to 'with editor.' It has been 5 days already, and it is still 'with editor.' Can you please tell me what's going on? Is it a tragedy?"

In academic publishing, the process of submitting a paper usually involves several stages. "Under review" means that the manuscript is being evaluated by peer reviewers. "With editor" suggests that the manuscript is now being assessed by the editor-in-chief or an associate editor. The length of time spent in each stage can vary, and it does not necessarily indicate a tragic situation. It is common for the review process to take some time, so it is important to be patient.

啷个哩个咚咚锵 2023-02-21

End of December submitted
2-1 under review
2-16 with editor
2-21 with editor
Is it going to be rejected? It has been 5 days with the editor.

时代鲁迅 2023-02-19

Still haven't found the reviewer, it's been 20 days.

蓝小矿 2023-02-18

12.14 submitted
01.25 major revision: three reviewers (one month)
02.09 revision submitted
02.18 accepted

蓝小矿 2023-02-18

Fast speed, relatively smooth.

ZXHAI 2023-02-17

Excuse me, have you found the reviewer? It is equally difficult to find a reviewer.

时代鲁迅 2023-02-17

Now it is still under review; I don't know whether I should email the editor to recommend reviewers.

时代鲁迅 2023-02-17

It has been a month since I submitted it. I have been working with the editor for half a month, and it took another half month for the review process. The editor invited reviewers, but they all declined. It's strange, is it really this difficult to find reviewers now? Has anyone else experienced this situation? How should I handle it?

Pluto-X-Y 2023-02-09

After the article has been edited and decided to undergo external review, Elsevier will send an email to the corresponding author, which contains a link to view the detailed progress of the peer review.

科研废物啊 2023-02-06

Rejected, give a transfer

拜伦湾 2023-02-03

Don't worry, is this your first time submitting?

你好1 2023-01-31

May I ask, when I was reviewing the reviewers' comments, I found that the editor mentioned submitting supplementary materials such as data and code. Do I have to submit these? Also, there was a mention of creating an AudioSlides presentation. What is this for? Can I ignore it?

你好1 2023-01-31

Excuse me, I sent a request for an extension of the submission to the editor, but haven't received any response. The deadline for revisions is approaching. Does anyone know what to do in this situation?

zzy 2023-01-28

May I ask what stage we are at now? I also submitted it during the Chinese New Year, it has been 8 days and I am still not invited by the editor.

科研废物啊 2023-01-20

Is it because of the Chinese New Year that it's still in the Submitted to Journal status for 3 days?

jjjjwang 2023-01-17

I submitted it on October 23rd, and still haven't received any results. It has been almost three months, so slow.

科研民工-2022 2023-01-08

2022.10.21 Submitted to Journal, then went through Editor invited and Editor assigned, one week later under review
........
........
2022.12.14 With editor
2022.12.15 Major revisions (two reviewers, both generally approved, one provided over a dozen minor comments and the other requested clarification of innovation and increased depth of discussion). A total of 17 comments, with a response of almost 7000 words.
2022.12.29 Submitted to Journal (with editor, Editor Invited)
2022.12.30 Under review
2022.12.31 Under review
2023.01.04 With editor
2023.01.05 Accepted
2023.01.06 Copyright transfer + proofreading
2023.01.07 Online

chuzi 2022-12-21

12.07 Submission
Editor invited 6 days
Editor assigned on the eighth day
Why is the editor assignment so slow, is there still hope?

浅浅and蓝蓝 2022-12-14

Generally, after a rejection, there will be no further submission unless the author is a big shot or a member of the editorial board.

爱学习的东东 2022-12-04

Dear experts, I submitted an article and the editor found that my similarity score is slightly high at 33%. After reducing it, can I still resubmit? Will it be rejected?

机智无敌的超人 2022-11-04

Has the water research been rejected? Can it be resubmitted to this journal after making the revisions according to the reviewer's comments?

机智无敌的超人 2022-10-31

Why was it submitted for review on the 20th before, but when I opened it today, the submission date changed to the 30th? Why is that? Is it because there are too few reviewers, or because the reviewers' opinions differ too much, so the editor found other reviewers?