橙子2013 2023-07-20

Logistics direction has already been accepted.

橙子2013 2023-07-20

Very soon, less than a week.

乎其 2023-07-05

May I ask how long the poster has waited for the "Required Reviews Completed" status to proceed to the next step? Thank you.

在学术的道路上追寻！ 2023-06-25

A colleague sent their paper to 6 external reviewers at the same time, but only received feedback from two reviewers before making a decision! Usually, there are more than 3 reviewers involved, but the specific situation is not clear.

乎其 2023-06-20

It seems that this journal usually sends articles to three reviewers. Why did the original poster's article only get sent to two reviewers?

在学术的道路上追寻！ 2023-06-18

Submitted at the end of May, the status changed to "under review" three days after submission. A total of two external reviewers were assigned, and both have accepted the reviewing task. The previous two papers, CIE and IJPE, were successfully published. Hopefully, TRE will also have a good outcome!

橙子2013 2023-06-03

I have also undergone the third review and am looking forward to a good outcome.

橙子2013 2023-06-03

I have also gone through three rounds of review and am looking forward to a good outcome.

在学术的道路上追寻！ 2023-06-02

I sent it for external review just 2 days after submitting it. Currently, I can see that there are 2 external review experts!

帅气正派的角色 2023-04-16

Oh my god, why did TRE editor invite 8 reviewers for my paper? Has anyone else experienced this situation?

一 2022-09-01

May I ask in which field your investment in artificial intelligence is?

蔡新一 2022-06-01

I submitted a review article and received a desk rejection after one week. The process was very fast and friendly.

-李博士- 2022-05-31

Already in the third review, there is still one reviewer left to handle. Hope for a good outcome. Sigh, every transportation researcher has a dream of making their part.

小学渣是我 2022-05-07

After about 15 days, the status directly changed to "under review". Currently, there are 3 reviewers who have agreed to review it. Looking forward to good results.

蔡新一 2022-05-06

The text translates to: "The submission was a review article, and the outcome was a desk reject. In the first week, it was submitted to the journal. After one week, I received an email from the editor stating that my paper was rejected. The email was worded politely and in a friendly manner."

蔡新一 2022-05-03

May I ask how you are doing now, OP?

小学渣是我 2022-04-13

It has been a week and it is still "Submitted to Journal," a bit slow.

3606 2022-03-26

Just finished reading an article on the application research of reinforcement learning. It's not easy and requires high innovation. Most of the articles accepted are still focused on the OR model, which is more suitable for scholars in the traditional transportation field to submit.

3606 2022-03-26

In the field of transportation, it feels like IF has greatly increased this year, second only to TS and TR-B.

letpubID 2021-06-24

In the past five years, the quality of TRE journals has significantly improved. In 2020, the number of submissions exceeded 2000, with an acceptance rate below 10%, indicating a high level of difficulty. With the appointment of two new editors-in-chief, the number of reviewers increased to 4-6 per article. Typically, accepted articles go through two rounds of major revisions, which fortunately only take about a month each. Overall, the review process is considered fast.

While the journal does not deliberately emphasize the fancy mathematical forms of TRB, it still requires high standards in modeling and expects insights and implications in the articles.

Although the journal's impact is slightly lower than TRB, it is noticeably higher than several other parts.

TSPartB 2021-05-13

Journal double-blind review
The first review took 3 months, and major revisions were required.
During the second review, Reviewer 1 suddenly claimed that the model was incorrect and provided a counterexample, leading to rejection. The editor rejected the paper, but Reviewers 2 and 3 agreed to accept it.
The author defended against Reviewer 1's counterexample, and the editor and Reviewer 1 agreed to reconsider. Reviewer 1 suggested conducting an additional experiment, which required major revisions.
Finally, the paper was accepted after the third review, which took a total of 8 months.
Personally, I feel that the reviewers chosen by this journal are not fellow experts in the field, and some of the questions raised were not very professional.

paperpaperluckstarhaha 2021-05-06

Harder than imagined. The reputation of the magazine has been rising in the past two years.
Before submitting, personal information and fund information need to be deleted, and double-blind review is required, which is quite difficult.
Although there are connections, blind review is not useful.
After three rounds of major revisions, the first two rounds had three reviewers, who were all very serious and meticulous, and they raised very sharp questions.
A new reviewer was added in the third round.
Fortunately, it was accepted, otherwise, it would have been really frustrating.