Verified Reviews - SURFACE ENGINEERING
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

小小明 2022-11-14

The speed is a bit slow, and the overall requirements are relatively strict. There shouldn't be any major issues if the editor submits it for review. The process is as follows, let's encourage each other.

18th July 2022: Manuscript Submitted
19th July 2022: With Editor
20th July 2022: Out for Review
12th August 2022: Reviews Complete
18th August 2022: Decision Pending
22nd August 2022: Revision Required
26th September 2022: With Editor
16th October 2022: Out for Review
18th October 2022: Reviews Complete
18th October 2022: Decision Pending
19th October 2022: Revision Required
29th October 2022: With Editor
31st October 2022: Out for Review
4th November 2022: Reviews Complete
12th November 2022: Decision Pending
12th November 2022: Accepted

Abaqus@NTU 2022-08-17

Hello, may I ask what does "similarity must be reduced to less than 10% see report attached %REVIEWER_ATTACH_DEEP_LINK%" mean? How can I open this attachment? It's my first time seeing this. Please advise. Thanks!

* Timeless 2022-08-15

I submitted an article in the 17th year and found it quite simple. The editors and reviewers were very nice. It took a week to make formatting changes and then a month and a half to receive the first round of review comments. After making the necessary revisions, it was accepted in a week. The only downside is that it takes a year for WOS (Web of Science) inclusion.

吃个冬瓜瓤 2022-04-09

Various requirements are very abnormal, such as the repetition rate should not exceed 5% and so on. After the first submission was modified according to the checklist, the editor-in-chief rejected it due to the large number of authors, which delayed it for more than a month.

admission 2022-03-04

Will you send an email if rejected? Will it be displayed on the website?

qym87 2021-11-04

Submitted for review at the beginning of January, received feedback at the end of February (minor revisions).
Revised at the beginning of March, received language review in early July.
Revised at the beginning of July, received language review in early August.
Made final revisions in mid-August, accepted at the end of October.

Mr Zhu 2021-11-03

Excuse me, has the format been fixed now? Can I ask for advice?

Mr Zhu 2021-11-03

The format is very trashy and abnormal. I was rejected twice because of the format.

qym87 2021-09-14

This publication is too slow. Be cautious. You can search for the papers they have published, and there should be a reference format provided.

qym87 2021-09-10

Translated text: The project was submitted at the beginning of January and went through four rounds of external review.

The first review took 1.5 months, the second review lasted 3 months, the third review took another 1.5 months, and just recently we made revisions and sent it back for the fourth review.

During the second review, it was suggested that the language needed polishing, so we made the necessary changes. In the third review, it was advised that professional proofreading was required. We just finished polishing and revising it, and it is currently in the fourth review phase.

sciwangJT 2021-09-02

The formatting requirements are a bit strict. Which big brother has already won? Please leave a contact method to show me the manuscript. Thank you! Also, what format should be used for the reference list? Because it's not available in Mendeley, what format should I use?

余生欢喜 2021-06-23

First direct rejection after submission due to mainly formatting issues. Later, made revisions according to the checklists provided by the editor and resubmitted. It has been about a week, and the status is still "with editor." It feels like it's not looking good.

redrose1314 2021-05-19

Do you know anything about the submission process for surface engineering? I just started submitting and got rejected. Even after making revisions and resubmitting, I still got rejected. The key is that both rejection letters I received were the same, asking for revisions and plagiarism checks based on the checklist they provided. How can I meet their requirements?

半醋柠檬 2021-04-16

It seems that even a slight problem will be rejected. Just make some good changes according to the list he provided and resubmit it.

Nicholas1990Iowa 2021-01-28

Do we have to use the template provided by them for submission?

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started