太阳hld8124 2023-07-30

May 3, 2023 Submission
May 8, 2023 Under review
June 8, 2023 Major revision, both reviewers are professional, with more than 40 comments in total.
July 11, 2023 Returned for revision, spent a month making changes, modifying figures, adjusting introduction, conclusion, and discussion sections. Also sought assistance from a company for proofreading.
July 12, 2023 Second round of under review
July 18, 2023 Minor revision, not many comments, just some minor details that the reviewers asked to be changed.
July 20, 2023 Returned for revision
July 21, 2023 Quickly, the editor asked for minor edits, mainly related to formatting issues, incorrect references. The editor asked for a full language and formatting check.
July 27, 2023 Made changes for a week, checked the formatting, sought assistance from a proofreading company for a second round of proofreading (did not charge). Checked and modified the language again.
July 30, 2023 Accepted
Overall, it went relatively smoothly, taking less than 3 months. The handling by the editor was also fast. It is my first article on Aquaculture, sharing experiences and spreading good luck.

陈晨宸 2023-05-30

Waiting for the second trial!

mlxg 2023-05-30

Does the second review involve finding new reviewers?

mlxg 2023-05-30

Are new reviewers added for the second review and the third review?

JimPN 2023-05-19

February 9th - Submitted
February 13th - With editor
February 20th - Under review
March 27th - Received first review comments, major revisions required
April 2nd - Revised manuscript returned
May 9th - Received second review comments, minor revisions required
May 13th - Revised manuscript returned
May 17th - Under review (third review)
June 7th - Minor revisions
June 7th - Revised manuscript returned
June 8th - Minor revisions
June 8th - Revised manuscript returned
June 12th - Accepted!!!
After 4 months, finally accepted. Thank you to the kind-hearted editor and reviewers.

爱科学的杰克 2023-05-13

Posted on January 21st, feedback received on February 13th (major revisions).
Revised manuscript returned on March 7th, feedback received on March 19th (although it was also major revisions, there were only two issues).
Revised manuscript returned on March 27th, accepted on April 12th.
Overall, the review process was relatively efficient. Good luck!

菜鸡小江 2023-05-10

I would like to ask if it's because you couldn't find a reviewer that this happened. I've also encountered this recently.

菜鸡小江 2023-05-10

I would like to ask, what is it like behind? As for me, I am also now.

Aarion1209 2022-12-29

2022.07.25 submit
2022.7.29 under review
2022.11.23 major revision (two reviewers suggested minor revisions, editor requested major revisions)
2022.11.26 submit revision
2022.11.29 under review
2022.12.28 accept
First review took 4 months, second review took a month; I don't know where the editor found the reviewers, but the process was really slow!

Alger 2022-12-02

Posted on October 13th, revised after the first review on November 21st, and accepted on December 2nd.

chq 2022-11-01

On October 23rd, submitted. On October 25th, the editor said the cover letter did not meet the requirements. The same day, it was revised and resubmitted. On October 27th, it became "with editor". On October 30th, it became "under review". Hoping for good news.

赵才源 2022-10-21

Why are you so fast? I submitted on October 19th, and it is still "Submitted to Journal" now.

零六月 2022-10-14

I submitted on October 13th, and as of October 14th, it is currently under review. I hope for some good luck to happen.

群蓝骑士 2022-09-22

Submitted on September 5th, it has been 18 days since "with editor". Has anyone encountered this situation before? Why has it not been "under review" yet?

zcphbumaster 2022-09-05

submit: 2022/08/09
in peer review: 2022/08/09~2022/09/05
I heard that the initial review will take about a month to receive the results, hoping for minor revisions to be accepted!
Wishing everyone good luck in their research!

Jujoy 2022-06-13

The comments provided by the reviewer are quite detailed, and the suggestions given are also very helpful.

梁学友 2022-03-10

Wow, you're really pitiful. Cheer up and submit to a new one, this magazine isn't that great either.

publish or perish 2022-02-15

Two rounds of review took a total of 443 days. After 8 months of the first round, feedback was received and major revisions were made. After 5 months of the second round, feedback was received and the paper was rejected.

梁学友 2022-01-24

When did you submit yours? I submitted mine on the 13th, but received a response on the 18th saying that my cover letter format was incorrect. I re-uploaded it on the 19th, and it wasn't until the 24th that it was finally reviewed by the editor.

群蓝骑士 2022-01-16

Why does it keep showing "submitted to journal"?

度数又高了 2021-08-14

Overall, it went very smoothly, and the reviewers were very professional and responsible.

科研狗进化中 2021-04-24

20210129 submit - Submitted on January 29, 2021.
20210309 major revision - Major revision on March 9, 2021.
20210326 revise - Revised on March 26, 2021.
20210424 accept - Accepted on April 24, 2021.

The editor responded promptly, and the reviewer's comments were very pertinent. The revised article, after incorporating the reviewer's suggestions, became more rigorous. It greatly helped in improving myself and is a good journal worth submitting to.

zhu猪虾 2021-04-16

Can that expert share the submission process? Why is it always "with editor"?

饲养员 2021-04-02

The response time depends on the speed of the reviewers. Generally, there will be a reply within 1-2 months.

cc923 2021-03-31

I am working on algae odor. I want to submit this. How long does the review process usually take? It seems like the official website mentions a long duration.

饲养员 2021-03-26

The review speed is very fast, the Japanese reviewers are very meticulous, they even check for spaces and punctuation errors, and the article undergoes three revisions before being finally accepted.