KIDDARK 2023-05-18

Posted on March 30th, today is May 18th, it has been one and a half months, and it is still in the "with editor" status. Why is it so slow?

叶子 2023-01-21

20 Sep 2022 Received at Editorial Office
28 Dec 2022 Article revised (including two revisions)
18 Jan 2023 Article accepted for publication
Editor-in-chief: Dongsheng Jeng
The reviewing speed is getting faster, and there is typically a review notification within a month.
The journal is also improving, and it has been upgraded to a second-tier journal in the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Nedy 2022-12-13

Submitted on September 13, returned for revision on November 21, with two reviewers providing feedback, one requesting major revisions and the other requesting minor revisions. Sent back for revision on December 8, and directly accepted on December 12.

solidwork 2022-11-22

Traducción al inglés:
Received 23 December 2021 - Recibido el 23 de diciembre de 2021
Revised 23 February 2022 - Revisado el 23 de febrero de 2022
Accepted 12 March 2022 - Aceptado el 12 de marzo de 2022

急盼回复 2022-11-12

It has been over six months already, can you remind me?

Polyfit 2022-11-01

This journal is originally slow, and some classmates around me have submitted to it, probably with a cycle of about one and a half years.

急盼回复 2022-10-26

How long does the first trial take? It has been six months and I still haven't received any news.

花泽酸菜 2022-10-26

Why is the second review still under review after two months? Anxiously waiting...

PeterPoly 2022-10-26

This situation, from what I understand, should rarely be refused.

急盼回复 2022-10-25

Already invested for 6 months, still under review, so slow?

shengaoyimiba 2022-09-28

Who is the chief editor?

PeterPoly 2022-09-22

The first SCI paper in life, I would like to thank the editor. Although the review process was a bit slow, it was actually due to the reviewers. The editor kept submitting the paper for review, but there were constant rejections from reviewers, resulting in a slow review process. Overall, the SCI in the second district has strict requirements for papers. The three reviewers provided different feedback on various aspects, covering almost every part of the main text. The issues were very professional, and it took a long time to make the revisions.
2022.2.4 submitted to journal
2022.2.11 with editor
2022.3.9 under review (date changed multiple times during this period)
2022.7.16 required reviews completed
2022.7.17 required reviews completed
2022.7.28 decision in process
2022.8.7 major revision
2022.8.30 submitted to journal
2022.8.30 with editor
2022.9.1 under review
2022.9.5 required reviews completed
2022.9.21 accepted

FrankReary 2022-09-18

Normal, I am exactly six months old...

FrankReary 2022-09-18

I don't know if everyone's situation is different. It took me half a year to finish the external review. However, the day after submitting the revised version, I entered the external review quickly. But until now, it has been two weeks and there has been no decision. The speed of this journal is a bit slow.

蓝眼睛 2022-09-14

This cannot be screenshot,
SOILDYN-D-22-00661 Pseudo-dynamic analysis of reinforced slope with anchor cables Other Author Jun 02, 2022 Aug 21, 2022 Completed - Accept Aug 21, 2022 Accept
You can go to the official website to read the article.

AJ_LeBron 2022-09-14

This journal is really slow in terms of speed. As for the fact that they only include it once a month, I dare not comment too much.

急盼回复 2022-09-14

May I ask if it is normal to still be "Under Review" after 5 months of submission? What does it mean when the "State date" changes every time?

AJ_LeBron 2022-09-12

The text translates to: "Submitted on August 7th, and it was under review on August 8th. Until now, on September 12th, it is still under review. Is this speed considered normal?"

keyangou+1 2022-08-22

Are you really that fast? I submitted mine on June 20th, and the external review was only prompted in August.

蓝眼睛 2022-08-22

It feels quite fast. The timeline is as follows:
2022.06.02 Submissions
2022.08.21 Acceptance
Three revisions in between.

王权 2022-07-28

The chief editor of civil engineering should be too slow.

keyangou+1 2022-07-27

Posted on 2020.06.20, until now it is still in "with editor" status. I have sent a reminder once after a month, but there was no response and the status has not changed.

蓝眼睛 2022-06-28

The corresponding author can see it, but if they are only co-authors, they cannot see it.

牛哥大人 2022-06-27

How many reviewers have finished reviewing it?

搞科研的孩子 2022-06-12

It shouldn't be the case, some reviewers are efficient. I have been with the editor for two weeks now, and I just want him to reject it quickly.

蓝眼睛 2022-06-12

I feel like I'm in trouble. I invited a reviewer, and one of them finished reviewing the manuscript in just two days. It seems like things are moving too fast and I might be in trouble.

早起的人 2022-06-10

I recently submitted two months ago and it is still under review. It seems to be taking longer than usual recently.

搞科研的孩子 2022-06-08

Is the submission process so slow? The submission turned into "With editor" the next day, and now it has been "With editor" for over a week.

大魔王 2022-05-06

The boss is the one who edits and reviews.

大魔王 2022-05-06

Who is that editor, bro?