Verified Reviews - Small
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Wang1995 2023-05-23

The submission AFM has not been reviewed, asking to transfer to small, it has been 12 days and still not reviewed. Is there anyone in the same situation? Why is it so slow?

一叶知秋 2023-05-20

I am also an AFM student. I have received a minor repair, a major repair, and a rejection (given that I am in the top 30%). However, the editor rejected it, and I have not received a response to my appeal for more than ten days. So I provided some constructive feedback, and then it was transferred to a smaller publication. It was accepted without being sent for external review.

有光 2023-05-20

"Rejecting and resubmitting is similar to major revisions."

有光 2023-05-20

I probably don't recognize him. The assigned editor is a foreigner.

有光 2023-05-20

Generally, it takes about two weeks to proof.

细胞外囊泡 2023-05-19

Reject and resubmit = accept

科研Yang阳 2023-05-19

4.11 Manuscript submitted
4.17 With editor
4.21 Under review
5.19 Reject

The reviewer made two major revisions and rejected the manuscript, but the editor gave the option to resubmit. Would there be high hopes for this resubmission?

29 2023-05-18

It has been 20 days and it is still not assigned to an editor after being submitted. Why, why, is this speed catching up with BM? Does anyone know why?

Bzzz 2023-05-18

How is the current situation now?

Bzzz 2023-05-18

How many days has it been now, has the situation changed?

Rob小欣 2023-05-17

Before this, the manuscript was rejected with one positive and one negative review after being sent to AFM for review. After appealing, there was no news for one month, so it was decided to submit it to Small on their own.

Editor Lisa Smith was very nice and after receiving the manuscript, she found out that the appeal was still ongoing at AFM. She helped us inquire and confirm the denial, and suggested that we directly email the revised version of the previous draft to her. The time for returning the revised version is flexible and has no specific deadline.

It was a very difficult piece of work. Wishing Small the best!

Here is the specific timeline:

2023.2.1 - Manuscript Submitted
2023.2.3 - With Editor & email to inquire about the status of the previous AFM submission
2023.2.5 - Reply email to the editor explaining the situation
2023.2.7 - Editor's email informing the denial of the AFM status & requesting a response to the previous AFM review comments and submission of the revised version
2023.3.15 - Revised draft returned to the editor & With Editor
2023.3.21 - Under Review
2023.4.13 - Major Revision, with two reviewers
2023.5.3 - R1 Submitted & Under Review on the same day
2023.5.15 - Accept

取个名字 2023-05-17

Summary: The first-instance opinions shall be responded to within 90 days.

111@ 2023-05-17

How do you view it instantly? Didn't it just pass 12.1?

Xwolf 2023-05-16

I don't know what the editorial department is up to. Normally, they only give 10 days for manuscript review, but it has been over 20 days and the submission hasn't even reached the editor's hands. Could it be that they are only dealing with manuscripts from acquaintances?

一直会飞的科研鱼 2023-05-15

I haven't written yet. If you don't come back soon, I will remind you to write.

我就改个名字 2023-05-15

Did you write a letter to the editor?

啤酒gala 2023-05-14

The current instant impact factor is 12.88.

啤酒gala 2023-05-14

The current real-time is 12.88.

啤酒gala 2023-05-14

Recently, it feels like many people have been submitting their work together, and my number has been pushed back to 3000+.

啤酒gala 2023-05-14

4.11 Submitted
4.17 With editor
4.21 Under review
It has been three weeks, feeling anxious.

一直会飞的科研鱼 2023-05-14

It has been 87 days and we still haven't received the first-instance opinion. It should be coming back soon, right? Hoping for good luck!

zhenzhen 2023-05-12

4.27投AFM translates to "Invest in AFM on April 27th."
5.10被拒建议转投small translates to "Rejected on May 10th, suggest investing in small."

zhgong007 2023-05-11

The editor is an acquaintance of your mentor, right? It feels like there might be some favoritism going on. I have submitted several articles, but either they are not being reviewed or, even if they are, it takes about two weeks for a response.

zhgong007 2023-05-11

Is it? This kind of situation is quite uncomfortable. The distribution of editors is delayed, and only after the distribution is done, they reject it. What were they doing earlier? It's just a waste of time. There's no way, let's change the place. Good luck.

柠檬苏打气泡 2023-05-11

Is it fake? Doi sent it, take a look.

guoke513 2023-05-10

Unfortunately, yesterday I was rejected by the editor after working with them. It's a pity that I wasted around 20 days of time beforehand.

小呆呆 2023-05-10

Either universally decline, currently calculated immediate impact factors, most of them have decreased significantly, I wonder if they will be multiplied by any factor when announced.

我就改个名字 2023-05-10

After 3 months of acceptance, congratulations, congratulations!!! Basking in the joy.

我就改个名字 2023-05-10

sous revue

西北蔡依林 2023-05-10

The text translates to: "The article submitted on April 28 has not been assigned an editor yet. It's too slow."

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started