紫陌 2023-07-26

Oh, mine is still with the editor, it's been 12 days.

Chris PENG 2023-07-25

Rejected, not within the scope.

Chris PENG 2023-07-24

The fact is slow, the status hasn't changed yet, there shouldn't be many drafts, I see that there are also many Chinese people. Why is it so slow, or is it the second zone?

紫陌 2023-07-24

Waiting for progress. It has been a week and still with the editor.

Chris PENG 2023-07-21

The speed is really slow, it has been five days and the status is still "With Editor".

蔡旭昆 2023-07-13

2023.5.24 Submission
2023.6.19 Received notice of major repair, 15 days to return for repair.
2023.7.10 Acceptance

zgand 2023-07-13

2023.7.12 Submission submitted to journal

Lucky_s 2023-07-10

How has the speed been recently? It has been three days with the editor.

xiaiphu 2023-04-26

2022.02.06 Submission
2022.03.6 Major revision
2022.03.12 Accepted

shipeiyu 2023-03-21

2023.3.17 Submission; 3.21 Rejected.

雅各布 2023-03-03

First revision, major revisions; second revision, minor revisions, then acceptance. The review comments are very pertinent.

Submitted on October 22, 2022.
Major revisions on November 27, 2022.
Minor revisions on January 6, 2023.
Accepted on March 2, 2023.

xyhxjw 2023-02-19

It is the official LaTeX template for Asweill.

折枝远处 2023-02-16

Four Reviewers

Review Process:
10.12 Submitted to Journal
10.13 With Editor
10.13 Editor Invited
10.14 Under Review
11.01 Under Review
11.14 Under Review
11.20 Under Review
11.29 Under Review
12.02 Revise
12.22 With Editor
12.23 Editor Invited
01.04 Under Review
01.29 Under Review
02.07 Under Review
02.10 Minor Revision
02.14 With Editor
02.15 Editor Invited
02.15 Decision in Process
02.15 Accept

paperguai 2023-01-24

Hello, may I ask if you have a paper template for this journal?

一学徒 2022-07-15

2021.11.11, submitted. 2022.3.2, first review returned, four reviewers, three provided general comments, one reviewed in detail, overall review comments are mostly positive. 2022.4.29, submitted revised manuscript. 2022.7.4, accepted directly.

The review speed was not as fast as claimed, but it was still acceptable. There may be delays due to Christmas and summer. Email reminders received responses. I haven't submitted to this journal before, but I found that it has the highest Impact Factor in the field of simulation. Overall, the journal's level is average and it does not require open access. It is not a low-quality journal.

xyhxjw 2022-04-28

Submitted on January 12th, received first-round comments on March 12th. Two reviewers provided 16 suggestions, and the editor requested major revisions.
Submitted revised manuscript on April 23rd, under review starting from April 28th, hoping for a favorable outcome.
Additional information: Decision made on May 27th, accepted on May 28th, taking a total of 4 and a half months.

wen123 2021-12-07

The draft was submitted a few days before National Day. It was reviewed by the editor the next day and sent for review on the third day. The review comments came back on November 1st, which was quite fast. There were a total of 15 comments from three reviewers, and the editor provided substantial revisions. It took ten days to complete the revisions and upload them, and it was sent for review on the same day. In early December, a notification email of acceptance was received. The speed of the journal is truly remarkable, and the handling speed of the editor is very fast, which is excellent.

leovin 2021-12-06

June submission, accepted by the end of October, one major revision and one minor revision. Overall, the chosen reviewers were very professional and it greatly benefited the quality improvement of the article.

duxiaoxi1993 2021-11-27

Submitted, submitted on November 15th, rejected on the 16th by the editor. Very quick response. They said, "I have now considered your paper, and have to decide that it falls outside the scope of the journal." It's just an excuse. They are probably not interested. I specialize in mechanical structure simulation and theoretical modeling, so how could it be outside the scope of the journal? This journal receives about 130 articles per year, and when I submitted, the numbering had already reached 1074. The competition is quite intense.

PennyWu 2021-10-21

The submission cycle was written incorrectly, it is over 5 months, and it takes 2 months to receive the initial review comments.

PennyWu 2021-10-21

5.14 Submission
7.12 Major revision comments Two reviewers, a total of 17 questions, very detailed
8.31 First revised manuscript returned
10.9 Minor revision comments returned One reviewer, two questions
10.17 Minor revision returned
10.20 Accepted
Overall, it went smoothly as long as you make the revisions seriously. The reviewers can still see your attitude and effort.
Hope everyone's submission goes smoothly.

奶茶不要茶 2021-09-30

I submitted a simulation optimization paper on GSPN and AnyLogic, but it was rejected for not being within the scope of the journal. The response was quite fast, receiving a reply within a few days.