Verified Reviews - APPLIED OPTICS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

不懂就问 2023-08-08

Hello, I would like to ask, how long does it take to assign an editor after the Quality Check Passed?

弗兰随风小欢 2023-07-26

Submitted on July 15th, 2023, and received minor revision comments on July 18th. After making the necessary changes, the editor-in-chief sent an email stating that it would soon go into peer review. After a week, it remained assigned to an editor. Then, on July 26th, 2023, the associate editor emailed me, stating that it was rejected as it fell outside the scope of the journal.

Pros: The rejection was received quickly.
Cons: The editor-in-chief (a foreigner) mentioned it was going for review, while the associate editor (a Chinese) stated it was rejected due to being outside the scope. What is going on?

弗兰随风小欢 2023-07-21

Is the OP still assigning editors now?

Andy 2023-06-15

As of May 23rd, there has been no assigned editor for submission.

给我一个拒稿的理由 2023-05-30

Option to Transfer to Optics Continuum - May 29, 2023
Final Manuscript Decision - May 17, 2023 - May 29, 2023 - Manuscript Rejected
Content Revision - May 04, 2023 - May 17, 2023 - Content Revisions Complete
Final Preproduction Review - May 02, 2023 - May 04, 2023 - Content Revisions
Final Manuscript Decision - April 30, 2023 - May 02, 2023 - Provisional Acceptance

给我一个拒稿的理由 2023-05-30

A very disappointing journal. Submitted on November 29th, it was not reviewed until the end of February. Both reviewers requested major revisions. After addressing the first reviewer's comments, the second reviewer clearly did not understand the subject matter. Their suggestions were completely irrelevant. After making the changes, it was conditionally accepted. However, the second reviewer provided a second round of comments, and after the revisions were submitted, it was rejected outright. This journal and its editors are truly incompetent. I strongly advise against submitting to such a journal.

给我一个大芒果 2023-05-10

Hello, how can I resubmit my manuscript?

柯南爱好者 2023-04-26

You know, I want to ask if I forgot to recommend reviewers, but I already submitted it last night. How can I contact the editor to add the reviewers?

只爱睡觉 2023-03-29

The editorial review speed of AO is particularly fast. Initially, 7 reviewers were contacted, and three of them accepted the review. Two weeks later, two reviewers came back with their opinions, but the third reviewer did not respond for a long time. As a result, the editor directly closed their review channel, which deserves a positive evaluation. The revised version was accepted just two days after it was sent back.

明天花会开 2023-03-27

Is applied optics bad?

jiang393 2023-01-14

I am a guest editor of "Metals" and currently publishing an article in the field of fluorescence. Any fluorescence-related topics are welcome. The submission website is https://www.mdpi.com/journal/metals/special_issues/phosphor_materials_for_high_temperature_applications. Further details can be communicated via email at jianglinwen@nbu.edu.cn.

dai 2023-01-05

On January 5th, 2023, a reply to the reminder letter was received, in which the other party stated that they would inform the Journal Coordinator. The exact words were: "***********. I have forwarded your concern to the Journal Coordinator. We will notify you on any response.********"

dai 2023-01-05

On 2023/01/04, after much hesitation, I finally mustered the courage to send a reminder letter. After all, the reviewer has already delayed for a full 2 months. It should be a reasonable request to remind them at this time.

billions1943 2022-12-30

What happened in the end? What opinions does the fastest respondent have in their review?

dai 2022-12-28

Reviewer Request Status Review Status
Reviewer 1 Too Busy (October 12, 2022)
Reviewer 2 Too Busy (October 26, 2022)
Reviewer 3 Agree (October 27, 2022) Waiting, Due (November 10, 2022)
Last Reminder Date (December 26, 2022)
Reviewer 4 More Time Approved (November 1, 2022)

dai 2022-12-28

Peer Review 08 October 2022
Assign Editor 08 October 2022 08 October 2022 Editor Assigned
Peer Review 03 October 2022 08 October 2022 peerreviewMain_EditorDeclined
Assign Editor 03 October 2022 03 October 2022 Editor Assigned
Quality Check 30 September 2022 03 October 2022 Quality Check Passed
Submit Manuscript 30 September 2022 30 September 2022 Submission Complete
Other emails

billions1943 2022-12-23

What's going on upstairs? Please update on the progress.

wshang 2022-12-18

Dual-column is mainly used to assess the number of pages, and if it exceeds 10 pages, there will be a charge. At that time, I couldn't find it, so I used the dual-column format you mentioned. Later, after being accepted, they said that the single-column format needed to be divided by a coefficient to roughly calculate the number of dual-column pages, but it may not be accurate.

支欧 2022-12-15

I would like to ask everyone if the editor requests to change the layout to double columns. The editor mentioned that the double-column template is located below the traditional template, but that template is for JOCN and there is no indication that it can be used for Applied Optics. I am very conflicted.

hi浪子 2022-12-06

Invited three reviewers, two of them completed the review, and one did not accept the review. In this situation, will the editor reach a conclusion based on the opinions of the two reviewers?

科研人科研混 2022-12-05

Mine is the same. After the three reviewers completed their review, they did not provide any feedback.

2022-11-18

I submitted this journal article and on November 8th, I saw that it had been reviewed by three referees. How come it's still in the peer review process after 10 days? Is there a high possibility of it being rejected? I'm feeling anxious.

lionkk 2022-10-21

My paper also only has a Medline retrieval number. May I ask how you resolved it afterwards? After about a month, the paper was retrieved by WOS, just quietly wait.

lionkk 2022-10-21

Correct the mistake, it is the MEDLINE database, not the PUBMED database.

lionkk 2022-10-21

The reason why I initially filled in the field as "medicine" when first publishing is because I found that the paper was indexed in the PUBMED medical database, rather than the WOS core database. This has greatly troubled me. Could any friends who have already solved this problem kindly offer their assistance? Thank you all very much!

lionkk 2022-10-21

Publish 12 September 2022 13 September 2022 Published
Production 26 August 2022 12 September 2022 Publish
Final Preproduction Review 25 August 2022 26 August 2022 Production
Final Manuscript Decision 08 August 2022 25 August 2022 Manuscript Accepted
Author Revision 29 June 2022 08 August 2022 Author Revisions Complete
Preproduction Review 28 June 2022 29 June 2022 Author Revision
First Manuscript Decision 28 June 2022 28 June 2022 Major Revisions Required
Peer Review 02 May 2022 28 June 2022
Assign Editor 02 May 2022

shellly 2022-10-15

On September 19th, it entered the preliminary review stage. So far, 8 reviewers have been found. One of them agreed to complete the review on the same day. What does this mean? Could it be a rejection? TAT

Reviewer 1: Not Area of Expertise (September 30, 2022)
Reviewer 2: Waiting, Due (October 4, 2022)
Reviewer 3: Agree (October 14, 2022) Complete (October 14, 2022)
Reviewer 4: Request More Time (October 24, 2022) Waiting, Due (October 20, 2022)
Reviewer 5: Too Busy (October 14, 2022)
Reviewer 6: Waiting, Due (October 18, 2022)
Reviewer 7: Agree (October 13, 2022) Waiting, Due (October 27, 2022)
Reviewer 8: Waiting, Due (October 18, 2022)

jerry125 2022-10-01

If it exceeds 10 pages, there will be a charge of $300 per page. For the first colored print, it costs $650, and each additional colored print costs $325. If it does not exceed 10 pages and does not require colored printing, there will be no editing fee.

jerry125 2022-10-01

It is very likely a mistake that was not entered. Just need to inform the editor.

jerry125 2022-10-01

7.22 submission;
7.25 started looking for reviewers, found four reviewers during this period, two agreed to review while two were busy, ultimately only one reviewer provided review comments;
8.26 received review comments, with a deadline of 21 days for revisions;
9.12 uploaded revised manuscript;
9.20 Rereview Complete, received acceptance notification on the same day;
9.30 published, the editor diligently corrected 12 English language issues.

The first submission to SCI went relatively smoothly. Now I have encountered a problem and would like to seek advice from you all. It seems that I need to wait for the payment because I exceeded the page limit and need to pay for the extra pages. However, it coincided with the national holiday when the school and the bank were unable to process payments. I did not find any information about the payment deadline on the official website or in the emails. Should I inform the editor about this or is it okay to wait for a few days?

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started