wqg_hyf 2023-08-08

How many reviewers are there in total, please?

Ackles 2023-08-02

2023.04.07 submit to journal
2023.04.07 with editor
2023.04.07 under review
2023.05.04 decision in process
2023.05.08 major revision
2023.05.26 submit to journal
2023.05.26 with editor
2023.06.13 under review
2023.07.03 minor revision
2023.07.21 submit to journal
2023.07.25 accept

Translation:
2023.04.07 - Submitted to journal
2023.04.07 - With editor
2023.04.07 - Under review
2023.05.04 - Decision in process
2023.05.08 - Major revision
2023.05.26 - Submitted to journal
2023.05.26 - With editor
2023.06.13 - Under review
2023.07.03 - Minor revision
2023.07.21 - Submitted to journal
2023.07.25 - Accepted

cncncncn 2023-06-21

I would like to ask whether this is a normal revision suggestion or a request for resubmission after revision. The deadline for resubmitting the revised manuscript seems too short. The two reviewers have provided more than ten comments in total, but they did not request any additional experiments to be conducted.

lilililililll 2023-06-09

Received 22 March 2023;
Received in revised form 16 May 2023;
Accepted 6 June 2023

Chinese editors are very efficient, and the reviewers are highly professional and experts in their respective fields.

努力搬砖的Ph.D. 2023-05-03

2023.01.13 Submitted to Journal
2023.01.16 With Editor
2023.01.18 Under Review
2023.02.27 Minor Revision (Date Revision Due: 2023.03.20)
2023.03.13 Submitted to Journal
2023.03.18 With Editor
2023.03.20 Under Review
2023.04.13 Required Reviews Completed
2023.04.25 Decision in Process
2023.05.02 Accept

Translation:

2023.01.13 - Submitted to Journal
2023.01.16 - With Editor
2023.01.18 - Under Review
2023.02.27 - Minor Revision (Revision Due Date: 2023.03.20)
2023.03.13 - Submitted to Journal
2023.03.18 - With Editor
2023.03.20 - Under Review
2023.04.13 - Required Reviews Completed
2023.04.25 - Decision in Process
2023.05.02 - Accept

Scoutboi 2023-04-21

2022.12.12 Submitted
During the process, three reviewers were changed.
2023.04.01 Under review again.
May I ask if it is possible to send an email to inquire with the editor?

小黑馒头 2022-11-12

The paper was self-revised until there were no more changes to be made. It was submitted and published within 3 months. It took over 20 days for another round of revisions, which was responsible of the editor. The reviewers also reviewed it promptly.

留白 2022-09-02

2022.5.23 submission
2022.7.8 revised
2022.8.19 resubmission
2022.9.2 accept

Translation:
2022.5.23 submission
2022.7.8 revised
2022.8.19 resubmission
2022.9.2 accept

我是小渣渣 2021-12-16

October 14 submission
October 30 under review
November 18 under review, time updated, status unchanged
Until now, there is still no information.

tonnyzhong 2021-09-18

Is this journal currently ranked as Q2 in JCR? I always thought it was Q1. Is there any confirmed ranking?

zua_xdwx 2021-09-14

The ship control algorithm design and simulation, submitted on November 6th, received the first review on December 30th. Five reviewers suggested major revisions, with one month given for modifications. Due to some personal matters, the revised manuscript was submitted on February 5th. It was accepted on March 1st and will be available online in mid-March. Indexing will take place in May. In the past few years, it took about six months for classmates to receive the first review for their submissions. Last year, I reviewed papers for this journal and found that the reviewers' time requirements were very strict. It was also because of this reviewing experience that I chose this journal. I feel that everything went smoothly, and I was also lucky.

学术圈就是个坑 2021-09-14

OE has been constantly dissed in the past two years... Its reputation has severely declined.

学术圈就是个坑 2021-09-14

The level of research articles in Applied Ocean Research has already surpassed that of Ocean Engineering. The large number of publications in Ocean Engineering has led to a decline in quality. The acceptance rate for Ocean Engineering is 40%-50%, much higher than that of Applied Ocean Research. Applied Ocean Research is more suitable as a top-tier journal compared to Ocean Engineering.

肥工吴彦祖 2021-08-31

Ah, this is completely opposite to me and you. Here, we have voted a total of three times, two times directly rejected, and one time sent for review. The French editor sent it for review. But as soon as the Chinese editor saw that it was a simulated article, it was directly rejected...

青瓷碎了 2021-08-30

This journal places special emphasis on the practical application value of article content. I have submitted articles four times, and only one was accepted. The other three rejections were not even sent for review. As for the two editors, one is a big shot from the University of Sichuan in China, a leading figure in the field of numerical simulation in ocean engineering. They handle manuscripts relatively quickly. The other editor is from a prestigious university in France, focusing more on theoretical research. My articles were directly rejected by this editor three times, and I will not choose this editor again if I submit in the future. Additionally, this journal does not require recommending reviewers, and the number of submissions each year is not very large, so the two editors should be able to handle them all. (Unfortunately, the three rejected articles were resubmitted to Ocean Engineering, and they are currently awaiting the results. Hahaha, this is not to discredit OE.)

litiken 2021-08-25

Hahaha, which journal do you recommend?

肥工吴彦祖 2021-08-25

Because all the simulation types of articles I submitted were directly rejected, I resubmitted them to other journals and they were mostly accepted. The rejections were from Chinese editors. Maybe my writing was not good enough.

肥工吴彦祖 2021-08-25

Because all the simulation-type articles I submitted were directly rejected, I decided to submit them to other journals and they were mostly accepted. The rejections were from Chinese editors. Maybe my writing was not good enough.

litiken 2021-08-25

How did you know that the Chinese editor discriminates against simulated articles?

piggy_one 2021-08-17

2021.8.10 Required Reviews Completed
2021.8.12 Decision in Process
2021.8.13 Reject
Two opinions, one minor revision, and one from a renowned reviewer. I basically figured out who it was, as it's a leading figure in the field (from CMU). I also referenced several papers from his students. The expert believes that the originality is not outstanding and provided some specific suggestions for revision. I am honored and grateful to receive feedback from such an esteemed professional. The associate editor mentioned that there are too many submissions and the paper will be rejected without the opportunity for revision. They suggested making the revisions based on the expert's feedback and submitting to another journal. I will continue to work hard, make the necessary revisions, and submit to the next publication.

肥工吴彦祖 2021-08-16

The two editors of the journal, I feel that the Chinese editor has some discrimination against simulation articles, and rejected the submission within 3 days, with the following reasons: I have a lot of articles to deal with now, and because your external review will also be rejected, in order not to delay your time, I have rejected your submission and suggest you submit it elsewhere. I chose another editor in the system, but unfortunately, it wasn't assigned. I guess everyone doesn't want their articles reviewed by this Chinese editor, after all, the directions are different, leading to direct rejection.

litiken 2021-08-12

Submitted the revised manuscript, the next day it went under review. The process is fast, hoping for good results. My heart can't handle the stress anymore /(ㄒoㄒ)/~~

piggy_one 2021-08-09

It has been two months, it seems that they are still changing reviewers...
2021.7.21 under review
2021.8.06 under review
2021.8.07 under review

肥工吴彦祖 2021-08-07

I'm too powerless to comment. After submitting for 2 months, I received the review comments. There were two reviewers, one of them was obviously a foreigner who pointed out the deficiencies in my English grammar and suggested that I proofread it. They provided several basic review suggestions, acknowledged the value of the article, and recommended acceptance after major revisions. The other reviewer, who I suspect was a competitor, directly opposed acceptance and provided 12 very simple review comments, most of which were one-sentence replies. However, based on these comments, my article was rejected without any evaluation of its innovative content or main analysis. The editor-in-chief said that since the other reviewer was against it, they couldn't accept my submission and rejected it directly. It feels like luck plays a significant role in submitting articles. The review speed of 60 days was acceptable, but the reviewers were definitely unprofessional.

piggy_one 2021-07-30

Submitted, just making a note. The results may be out in the next few days. Praying for good luck.

2021.6.7 submitted
2021.6.11 under review
2021.6.17 under review
2021.6.27 under review
2021.7.17 under review
2021.7.21 under review

ynx 2021-07-21

Garbage journal, turtle-speed review process.

ynx 2021-07-20

Currently still under review.

litiken 2021-07-14

I submitted it in the afternoon, and it went under review in the evening. The speed is very impressive.

ynx 2021-07-06

Currently, July 6th, 2021, it is still under review.

小青平 2021-07-05

I was hired in about three months, as long as the method is in place, there will be quick results.