李同学 2023-08-08

It's still early, just wait a little longer.

权哥 2023-08-07

The text translates to: The article was submitted on July 17th, 23. As of August 7th, the status of the article is still "Invite Editor." May I ask what this situation means?

想一想呀 2023-07-14

Hello, if the recommended reviewer needs to upload a separate Word document, it seems that there is no option for recommended reviewers on the submission window, only options like cover letter and author biographies. How should this separate Word document be uploaded?

科研小白兔 2023-07-10

Yes, the publishing house will find a few more journals for you to transfer to.

要什么昵称 2023-07-10

Does the appearance of "decision in progress" after "under review" in this journal mean that it has been rejected? I know that some journals do not have the "decision in progress" process for revised submissions.

猫鲨 2023-07-05

3.16 Submission
3.20 With Editor
4.20 Under Review
4.23 Sent for review 2+, one reviewer agreed to review
5.14 Received review comments from one person
5.28 Second submission, added a new reviewer
6.1 Request review complete, received review comments from the second person
6.26 Under review, third submission
6.26 Under review, reviewer status shows 2+
7.4 Under review

I can only say the efficiency is too low. The editor held it for a month, and there was a half-month delay between the first and second external reviews. There was a delay of more than twenty days between the second and third external reviews. Is your website's Time to First Decision: 3.6 weeks meant to be a joke? Or does it include the cases where the submission was returned for re-submission due to incorrect format within this 3.6 weeks?

是豆豆啊 2023-07-05

In addition to filling out the system, recommended reviewers also need to separately upload a Word document.

想一想呀 2023-07-04

Hello, I would like to ask about something. I was also an invited editor before, and now there is a technical review: "Please provide the names, affiliations, and e-mail addresses of all the potential referees." But I have already filled in the recommended reviewers when submitting, what does this mean?

李同学 2023-06-21

Submitted on June 7
Received by the editor on the 12th
Until now, with the editor
It's just too slow, isn't it...

dandan1222 2023-06-10

3.10 Submission
3.16 With editor
3.20 Under review
4.9 Reviewer comments received: Two major revisions and one rejection. Editor suggests major revisions.
4.28 Revised
6.8 Accepted

科研小白兔 2023-06-06

This journal is showing the status "decision in process," which means it is being transferred. You can start preparing for the next journal.

我是颜值君 2023-06-06

May I ask if there is a process called "Decision in Process"?

大地1 2023-06-05

Each submission takes about 2 months to be accepted, and the process is fast. This time, the editor is Teacher Lin Weiying, who is very nice.

我是颜值君 2023-05-19

Come and share the joy with the host, accept...

我是颜值君 2023-05-19

Come and share the joy with the host, accept.

byakuya 2023-05-18

The text translates to: "It took 10 days for the editor to submit the review. The review process only took two weeks. The last two reviewers suggested minor revisions, which the editor also made. Currently, the manuscript has been sent back for revision. The only downside is that the journal's initial rejection due to formatting wasted a lot of time. Additionally, there was a delay in resubmitting the manuscript after the editor requested additional experimental sections, resulting in a month-long waste of time."

心心安安 2023-05-16

Basking in the good fortune of the original poster.

心心安安 2023-05-11

The literal translation of the text "沾沾楼主喜气" into English is "The host of the building is enjoying good fortune."

By666 2023-04-22

Is it normal for the editing rejection process to be this slow? It's causing inconvenience now.

kubi材料狗 2023-04-21

4.21 The editor rejected the manuscript, stating that it lacks originality.

By666 2023-04-21

Your situation may be that there is always a reviewer who accepts the review, but the time changes and they do not submit the review on time. Then the editor cannot gather two opinions and has to find another reviewer. However, it is indeed strange to repeat this process several times.

别来读博 2023-04-20

The Track system is just a time update, and the reviewer's comments still only return one.

By666 2023-04-20

Take a look at your track link. How is the status of the review? Or ask the editor.

柠檬草是思密达 2023-04-19

Submitted at the end of December, received acceptance notice in mid-April. One week after submission, there were formatting issues that required resubmission.
After the second resubmission, received minor revisions after three months. The reason for the long review process was that some reviewers did not review the manuscript, so new reviewers had to be found. The normal review period for reviewers is around 12 days (of course, reviewers can choose to extend the review period). If a reviewer does not accept the review, it means that these 12 days are wasted and a new reviewer needs to be found. If lucky, the first set of reviewers will review the manuscript, and the process will be fast.
Finally, good luck to everyone for acceptance!

kubi材料狗 2023-04-17

Thank you, I wish you a smooth reception. I will update the final situation later.

By666 2023-04-17

I also made a new friend who has been with the editor for a long time. Yesterday, he suddenly changed his status. He should focus on handling manuscripts. Don't be discouraged by the decision. Good luck to the original poster.

kubi材料狗 2023-04-17

Great, I probably didn't make it. Last night, it suddenly changed to "decision in process" without being reviewed. I feel like it's going to be rejected soon. This time is taking too long, it's really wasting time.

By666 2023-04-17

Last night, under review.

By666 2023-04-15

I have been with the editor from 3.23 until now, 4.15. I am working in the direction of gas sensors. I don't know if they have too many manuscripts (although it shouldn't take this long) and haven't seen it, or if they are having difficulty finding reviewers, or if the editor forgot about this manuscript or didn't adjust the submission status. I'm really frustrated.

旦专渣博 2023-04-14

Please submit your application cautiously for a faster review.
Submitted on 12.20.
Under review on 1.2.
(The date under "Under Review" has changed seven or eight times)
Under review on 3.29.
It's estimated that the first round will take over four months == It's slow, almost at a snail's pace.
==========Update==========
Under review again on 2023.04.20.
The date has been updated again, still under review. Can't they just give a straightforward response?