分形维数与分数阶微积分 2023-03-07

Rejected after one month of application.

win 2023-02-11

This situation is likely due to the author appealing the review comments. In cases where there are obvious errors in the review process, the appeal may be successful, and the review process will be restarted.

MathFA 2023-01-10

"China Science: Mathematics Excellence (English Edition)" is currently receiving a fair amount of attention. However, there is something peculiar: shouldn't the editorial board fully consider the opinions of the reviewers in order to establish a top-notch mathematical journal? Otherwise, the editorial board could simply make the decision to accept or reject articles without going through so much trouble. There was one paper that we carefully read through and found the author's conclusions to be average, with no new breakthroughs in terms of methodology. Therefore, we do not recommend publishing it in SCM. Surprisingly, six months later, that paper was actually published in SCM.

一日游 2022-05-23

Now, this is definitely a very difficult journal to publish in, so the quality of the papers should improve a lot!

YQQ71 2022-01-09

The employment rate is so high???? Are you sure???? Did you ask the journal editor about the employment rate?

EulerGauss 2021-12-08

I am advised to make revisions by both reviewers, but the editor rejected it directly. It's quite difficult to succeed in China's scientific community without connections.

yifanmath 2021-08-09

May I ask my colleagues, what is the current level of SCM in international journals? Is it comparable to the Pacific Journal of Mathematics? I seek guidance.

Herry 2021-03-12

Now it is really difficult to conduct scientific research in China. Two reviewers agreed to accept the manuscript, and the editorial board also agreed to accept it. However, in the end, the editor-in-chief rejected it.