WangY 2023-07-19

After the proofs are available for checking, the final version of your article will be published online in 3 days.

NUAARicardo 2023-06-22

May I ask what is the current status in "track your article"? It says "proofs available for checking", but the corresponding author has not received the proof via email for three days. Does this process need a few more days of waiting?

NUAARicardo 2023-06-22

Currently in proofs available for checking

WangY 2023-06-17

There are only two reviewers throughout the whole process.

WangY 2023-06-17

----Submission Stage----
2023.1.7 submit
2023.3.24 major
2023.4.12 resubmit
2023.5.26 accept
----Publication Stage----
2023.6.11 Your proof corrections have been returned to Elsevier
2023.6.14 Final version of your article published online (only a share link)
2023.6.16 Published online
----Others----
The Track your article function is very user-friendly, available in almost every stage. The links provided in emails are more timely than those on WeChat.

NUAARicardo 2023-06-09

14 months, 4 reviewers, the reviewers' opinions are very professional, and they have greatly helped improve the article. The journal's processing speed is very fast, especially when the final opinions came back and were accepted. However, the external review time is too long, which is probably beyond the control of the journal.

Apr 05, 2022 Submitted
Apr 08, 2022 Under Review
Nov 10, 2022 Required Reviews Completed
Nov 15, 2022 Decision in Process
Nov 15, 2022 Major Revision
Dec 15, 2022 Revision Submitted to Journal
Dec 30, 2022 Under Review
Apr 17, 2023 Minor Revision
Apr 24, 2023 With Editor
May 09, 2023 Under Review
Jun 08, 2023 Required Reviews Completed
Jun 08, 2023 Decision in Process
Jun 08, 2023 Accept

leal0123 2023-06-07

I would like to ask, have you been in the reviewing status since October, or did you receive a rejection after making revisions? Can I ask about your entire process? Thank you.

leal0123 2023-06-07

I want to ask, have you been in the reviewing process for 10 months straight? Or did you receive a rejection after making modifications? Thank you for answering.

Ricardo 2023-06-07

It has been 14 months already, still waiting.

Petrelli 2023-06-05

The speed is really slow. I applied in August last year, and it got rejected in June this year. The first review took 10 months, which was really frustrating. The editing process is also very slow.

多出成果 2023-01-14

Personal submission experience, for reference only.
2022.7.28 submitted to journal
2022.7.28 with editor
2022.8.5 under review
2022.9.17 under review
2022.10.10 Required Reviews Completed
2022.10.14 Major revise
2022.11.29 Submit the revised manuscript
2023.1.12 Accept
The opinions of the three reviewers were very professional, and after making revisions according to their suggestions, the quality of the article has greatly improved. Thank you to the editor and the three anonymous reviewers!

Tristehf 2022-12-23

Hello, why can't I find the template for this journal?

Tristehf 2022-12-23

Hello, may I ask if this journal requires open source code?

Tristehf 2022-12-23

Hello, may I ask if this journal requires open source code?

james 2022-12-13

24.09.2022 - Post
16.11.2022 - Minor revision
12.12.2022 - Submitting the version after minor revision

Petrelli 2022-12-05

Please translate the following text into English: "Submitted at the end of August in the 22nd year. Under review on October 3rd. It's already December 5th and still no feedback. It's so slow. Should I follow up on this situation?"

james 2022-11-17

Recently submitted, waiting for news.

zjy123 2022-11-14

22-1-21 Submission;
Review process takes about one week;
Reviewer comments returned in April;
Resubmission in May;
Sent for review in July;
Second round of reviewer comments returned on 22-10-7;
Accepted on 22-11-8;
Overall, the journal has a good impact, but the process is a bit slow, with updates taking at least 1-2 months each time.

kaijlwqzd 2022-11-11

What is the result?

Caleb 2022-09-20

The journal has a high recognition, and the speed of my article review is relatively fast (submitted on April 24th, 22, with the initial review taking about 2.5 months, and the second review taking about 1 month, accepted on September 18th, 22). The opinions provided by three experts were quite professional, and after one month of major revisions, the article was accepted.

Windy 2022-09-06

Excuse me, for the recent submissions or revisions, is there any that have been in the "with editor" status all along?

ipc_fighting 2022-08-11

1. 2021.12.28 Submission
2. 2022.5.14 Major revision with three reviewers
3. 2022.6.24 Submission of revised manuscript
4. 2022.8.10 Acceptance, all three reviewers agreed to accept

The entire process took 8 months. For those not in a rush, it is a very high-impact and highly ranked journal. The reviewers have high expectations for innovation. It is indeed a good journal in the field of intelligent manufacturing. The editor-in-chief always handles things very quickly. It mainly depends on the speed of the reviewers. I would like to have the opportunity to submit another article.

多出成果 2022-07-28

Just submitted the paper, recording it for reference. Will provide updates later. For reference only.

JerryLCC 2022-07-19

The reference template I use is Endnote. You can download the citation format from the official Endnote website.

wq520 2022-06-13

May I ask where to download the reference citation format? I couldn't find it on the official website.

许汉中 2022-06-11

Haha, I know which one you submitted. I saw your paper.

Polaris_cong 2022-05-19

Can I ask if only the logged-in corresponding author account can see the submission status of this RCIM? Other authors cannot see it? After my mentor submits the paper and I receive the confirmation email, when I log in to my own email, I cannot see the paper? In some journals, other authors can also view the status of the paper in real time through their own accounts.

Polaris_cong 2022-05-19

Can you please clarify if only the logged-in corresponding author can see the submission status of this RCIM? Other authors cannot see it? After my advisor submitted the paper, I received an email confirmation, but I cannot see the paper?

JerryLCC 2022-04-06

Progress update for submission, for reference:
1. 2021.11.09, Submitted to the journal
2. 2021.11.10, with editor
3. 2021.11.11, under review
4. 2021.11.12, under review (date changed)
5. 2021.12.01, under review (date changed)
6. 2022.1.20, Decision in Process
7. 2022.1.20, Major Revision
8. 2022.2.16, Revision submitted to the journal/With editor
9. 2022.2.17, Under Review
10. 2022.4.03, Required Reviews Completed
11. 2022.4.03, Decision in Process
12. 2022.4.05, Accept

Windy 2022-03-21

This journal will basically add new reviewers in each round. Now, this is also a relatively good mainstream review method for journals, where revised manuscripts should satisfy the original reviewers and gain recognition from new reviewers.