SCI余 2023-08-01

7.29 with editor - This means that the text or document is currently being reviewed or edited by an editor.
7.30 under review - This indicates that the text or document is currently being examined or assessed for review.

BZJ- 2023-07-29

Does the appearance of "decision in process" in external review always mean rejection?

小苏打S 2023-07-28

What is your current status now? It has been nine days with my editor.

Yangtree 2023-07-25

Bro, how about reminding them a second time? I also reminded the customer service, and they said they would urge for the manuscript, but there hasn't been any change so far.

科研搬砖大哥 2023-07-20

I used Esweiler's online customer service chat. I asked the customer service representative to check the following. They updated the status within an hour, but it wasn't useful. I am now planning to follow up for a second time.

Yangtree 2023-07-20

Hello, may I ask what is the editor's reaction after you urge for the manuscript? It's been a while since someone reviewed my manuscript, so I want to try urging for it.

咕噜噜 2023-07-20

7.13under review, five reviewers have been invited, but currently no one has accepted the review. Last time it was quick, why is it so slow this time? I am eagerly waiting to graduate. Seeing my friends' papers taking three to four months for review reminds me of my paper in 2020, which also took over four months for review. It's frustrating.

科研搬砖大哥 2023-07-15

Family, I have already graduated, but the first trial has not yet ended. It's already July 4th, and urging for the manuscript hasn't been effective. Family, we are getting extremely anxious. One review was completed on June 1st, but we still need one more review opinion.

咕噜噜 2023-07-14

Send an email to the editor-in-chief explaining the reasons for arguing, attach the first draft, the revised draft after the first review, and the revised draft after rejection. You can also directly send an email to the co-editor. Good luck.

book_liu 2023-07-13

Excuse me, how should I go about arguing? Should I directly send an email or speak with the editor?

book_liu 2023-07-13

Excuse me, how can I argue? Can I just send an email or talk to the editor directly?

咕噜噜 2023-07-13

5.23 - Review feedback received
6.19 - Revised manuscript
6.30 - Manuscript rejected
7.10 - Argue
7.12 - Discuss with editor

咕噜噜 2023-07-13

Hello, may I ask how many reviewers are there for a re-review after an appeal? Are you saying that there will be five reviewers during the appeal under review? Thank you.

tianshi 2023-07-07

For everyone's recent reference only, CO2 conversion direction, edited by an.

tianshi 2023-07-07

6.8 Submitted manuscript
6.8 Reviewed with editor
6.16 Under review
6.20 Required reviews completed
6.23 Required reviews completed
6.27 Required reviews completed
7.1 Required reviews completed
7.2 Required reviews completed
7.5 Required reviews completed
7.6 Decision in process
7.7 Transfer
When I first saw that there were so many dates, I thought there were a lot of reviewers. But it turns out that there were only 8 reviewers invited in total. It's the first time I've encountered 8 reviewers, with 5 revisions and 3 rejections. The editor rejected it and asked for a transfer. The review process was quite fast, but having 8 reviewers makes it challenging to address all the suggested revisions.

zunzun呀 2023-07-07

How long have you been investing? The recent processing has been really slow. I have been with the editor for two weeks.

菜菜2836 2023-07-06

Decision in process

BioMater 2023-07-03

Received at Editorial Office 5 May 2023
Major revision 6 Jun 2023
Article revised 22 Jun 2023
Article accepted for publication 29 Jun 2023
Article online 30 Jun 2023

Translation:

Received at Editorial Office on May 5, 2023
Major revision on June 6, 2023
Article revised on June 22, 2023
Article accepted for publication on June 29, 2023
Article online on June 30, 2023

指点贼贼 2023-07-03

Has the decision been made without going through the "under review" process? What will happen next, will it be a rejection?

dataiyang 2023-06-29

To be honest, the evaluation is not as good as ACS Catalysis. Fortunately, it has a high impact factor, which is sufficient. It would be best to prioritize journals with high recognition.

longzu1984 2023-06-29

Same situation as you, but I'm even more miserable. The initial draft was reviewed for half a year. The revised draft also took 2 months, with no urgency or attention.

期刊试金石 2023-06-19

I want to give you a high score, but... your review process is just too long. You made me revise and resubmit three times in a row. The reviewers already said that minor language changes would be acceptable, so why did you send it for another round of review? You are also an expert in this field, can't you make the decision directly? It's really frustrating. I sincerely advise all graduating students not to rely on ACB because it is really slow... However, I still appreciate the editor and reviewers for acknowledging my work. I originally submitted this work to Science Advances, but unfortunately, it was rejected with two positives and one negative review.

徐广志 2023-06-07

Excuse me, bro. Are you guys deciding to send an email to the editor in the letter to appeal?

VICKI0 2023-06-06

What is the result of the same condition?

科研搬砖大哥 2023-06-06

May I ask for an update on the status? I submitted it on March 18th, and so far, only one review has been completed. I don't dare to rush it either.

T大勤奋哥 2023-05-21

2023.01.17 submitted
2023.01.23 with editor
2023.01.25 under review
2023.02.16 required reviews completed
2023.03.02 revised
2023.04.01 with editor
2023.04.18 required reviews completed
2023.05.04 required reviews completed
2023.05.15 revised
2023.05.15 submitted
2023.05.20 accepted

Translation:
2023.01.17 - Submitted
2023.01.23 - With editor
2023.01.25 - Under review
2023.02.16 - Required reviews completed
2023.03.02 - Revised
2023.04.01 - With editor
2023.04.18 - Required reviews completed
2023.05.04 - Required reviews completed
2023.05.15 - Revised
2023.05.15 - Submitted
2023.05.20 - Accepted

Chem. and Phy. 2023-05-16

The quality of this journal feels very high, after all, it is a top journal in the field of catalysis and environment. Therefore, the difficulty of submission is quite high. However, the speed at which the editorial department handles manuscripts is quite efficient, and the suggestions given by the reviewers are very professional and meaningful, which is very helpful!

花椒小皇子 2023-05-13

Submission experience:
2023.02.09 submitted
2023.02.10 with editor
2023.02.12 under review
2023.03.06 required reviews completed
2023.03.28 revised
2023.04.22 with editor
2023.04.26 required reviews completed
2023.05.07 revision
2023.05.09 with editor
2023.05.13 accepted

沦落而成美 2023-05-11

The result of the submission on 3.14 has only one reviewer who has completed the review until now!! On 5.1, the status was updated to "under review" again. It's really slow!! I'm very worried about graduation.

小草1991 2023-05-08

Can send a link for inquiry.