Verified Reviews - RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

星一 2023-07-18

The following text translates to English as: "It has been over seven months since the beginning of December 2022. I hope it can quickly pass by."

小火车 2023-06-29

2023.6.21 Rights and Access
2023.6.26 Proof
2023.6.27 Published

Translation:

2023.6.21 Derechos y acceso
2023.6.26 Prueba
2023.6.27 Publicado

Translation:

2023.6.21 Rights and Access
2023.6.26 Proof
2023.6.27 Published

小火车 2023-06-20

2023.3.14 submit to journal
2023.5.13 revise (20 comments in total from two reviewers and the editor, all comments are profound)
2023.6.02 revision submitted
2023.6.12 revise (one comment from a reviewer)
2023.6.13 revision submitted
2023.6.19 accept
The handling speed of the manuscript is very fast, and the editor and reviewers are very responsible. They do not seek multiple reviewers like other journals. Once the reviewers' comments are considered sufficient by the editor, they will be returned to you. Best wishes for the continuous success of JRESS.

jonjon2 2023-06-12

Hello, may I ask how the manuscript's status is now?

上善若水 2023-05-29

2023 5.25 Submission
2023 5.28 with editor

Hope for a quick review.

456mutouren 2023-05-14

I apologize, but I am unable to open the provided link. Can you please provide the text you would like to be translated?

sk8兔兔酱 2023-05-14

The special issue that I understand has specified themes and a deadline set by the ACC, so the review process can be faster. Other than that, there is not much difference from regular issues.

energy-1 2023-05-11

Do you know the difference between a special issue and a regular issue? I also subscribed to the special issue.

sk8兔兔酱 2023-05-11

Record the time, the submission is a special issue.
Submitted on September 20, 2022.
Returned results: major revision on December 26, 2022.
Submitted modifications on January 10, 2023.
Returned results: minor revision on March 25, 2023.
Submitted modifications on April 16, 2023.
Returned results: accepted on May 9, 2023.

Overall, the speed is quite good, with the first review taking a little over three months. I plan to submit a regular manuscript in the future, but I'm not sure about the speed.

guess 2023-04-26

I would like to ask for the Latex template link of this journal.

Xu 2023-04-10

2022.10.18 - Submit initial draft;
2022.12.12 - Return for major revision;
2023.02.09 - Return with revised draft R1;
2023.03.02 - Return for minor revision;
2023.03.30 - Return with revised draft R2;
2023.04.03 - Accept.

energy-1 2023-04-06

Has been working with an editor for a month after the second revision, is it going to be rejected? It's just that I submitted it to a special issue. Does anyone know?

我定风波 2023-03-29

Okay, thank you for answering. I submitted an article before and the initial review took only 2 months. However, it has been over 4 months now and the initial review for the second article I submitted has not been completed yet. The status has also not been updated, and I am getting worried.

我定风波 2023-03-19

Have you submitted your manuscript for review three times? Is the likelihood of rejection higher after the review process?

黑暗与夜色 2023-03-18

Top journal in the field of reliability engineering! Submitted three times and finally got accepted once, will strive to get accepted again in the future.

Winsun 2023-02-02

Submitted at the end of September 2022, received the first round of review results at the end of November 2022. The editor gave an opportunity for major revisions, with one reviewer suggesting rejection and the other suggesting revisions, providing very specific comments. The paper underwent a thorough revision according to the suggestions, with over 50% of the content being rewritten. During this period, there was a delay of two weeks due to the COVID-19 pandemic. An extension request was submitted for the paper submission deadline, and the editor kindly granted a two-week extension. On January 17, 2022, the revisions were completed and submitted for review. The next day, it entered the "under review" stage, and after two weeks, the review comments were returned. Both reviewers were satisfied with the modifications and provided acceptance feedback. The editor ultimately agreed to accept the paper. The entire process went smoothly, with the editor responsibly giving an opportunity for revisions, which revitalized the paper. The reviewers also provided detailed feedback, specifying how to make the modifications. It was a great journal and a pleasant submission experience. Will definitely submit again next time!

czy 2022-12-11

This journal focuses on systematic research papers.

angusduan 2022-10-28

2022/10/28 completed - reject
Suggested to revise and resubmit after adding more content, but decided against it as graduation is more important.

轻一 2022-10-28

The quality of the journal is good, it is a top journal in the field of reliability research. I submitted it in December last year, and it went through one major revision and one minor revision. Today, in August, it was accepted. Originally, I just submitted it to give it a try. I have been working on this research for three years as a graduate student, and I didn't expect it to be accepted. It's a pity that I have already graduated, otherwise, if it was accepted earlier, I could have used this paper and my other articles to apply for a PhD program. However, it can still be considered as a perfect ending to my graduate student career.

angusduan 2022-10-18

2022.4.19 Submission
2022.5.09 under review
2022.6.09 under review
2022.9.18 under review
I really don't know what's going on, it feels like the status is automatically updated after 5 months (I wrote it wrong earlier). I really hope the editor rejects it soon, this journal is too frustrating.
2022.10.17 Decision in Process

ynn123456 2022-09-29

This journal is quite good. It is a top journal for mechanical reliability. I submitted my paper on April 15th and it was accepted on September 28th. Each revision took two months, but the review process was relatively fast. I would like to mention that this journal has a "decision in process" status, which seems to indicate that an expert's opinion has been received. When my paper was in the second round of review, it stayed in this status for two weeks. I thought my revisions were not satisfactory and that my paper would be rejected. However, it was just a false alarm. I would like to advise everyone to pay attention to this status.

pray\ 2022-09-29

2022年
4.11submit
5.22major
7.15resubmit1
7.16under review
8.21major/minor?
9.14resubmit2
9.16under review
9.29accept

Translation:
2022年 (2022)
4.11submit (Submitted on April 11th)
5.22major (Major revision)
7.15resubmit1 (Resubmitted on July 15th)
7.16under review (Under review since July 16th)
8.21major/minor? (Major or minor revision?)
9.14resubmit2 (Resubmitted on September 14th)
9.16under review (Under review since September 16th)
9.29accept (Accepted on September 29th)

pray\ 2022-09-28

Excuse me, did both of the emails I sent you for revisions clearly state "major revision"? Why does my second review email not mention major or minor revisions, only requesting modification...

taotaoer 2022-09-28

Record my submission experience:
5-7: Submitted
5-24: Under review
6-15: Decision
6-17: Major revision
7-26: Resubmit R1
8-26: Major revision
9-26: Resubmit R2
9-27: Accept
Both times required major revisions, with a total of three reviewers. Two reviewers accepted during R1, while the remaining one likely rejected, resulting in a second major revision requested by the editor. Concerned during R2 that the editor would be influenced by the third reviewer, but the outcome was positive. Thanks to the editor!

angusduan 2022-09-18

2022.4.19 Submission
2022.5.09 Under review
2022.6.09 Under review
2022.9.18 Under review
I really don't know what's going on. It feels like the status is automatically updated after 6 months. I really hope the editor rejects it soon. This journal is too unreliable.

冬天之歌 2022-09-12

Update progress:

2021 08 24 - Submitted
2022 05 09 - Major revision
2022 07 29 - Submitted R1
2022 08 05 - Under Review
2022 09 04 - Decision in Process
2022 09 05 - Minor revision
2022 09 07 - Submitted R2
2022 09 07 - Accepted

2021 12 21 - Submitted
2022 06 08 - Major revision
2022 08 18 - Submitted R1
2022 08 28 - Decision in Process
2022 09 12 - Accepted

论文奋进者 2022-09-04

2021 08 25 submit - Submitted on August 25, 2021
2022 05 09 major revision - Major revision completed on May 9, 2022
2022 07 29 submit R1 - Submitted R1 on July 29, 2022
2022 08 05 Under Review - Under review as of August 5, 2022

2021 12 21 submit - Submitted on December 21, 2021
2022 06 08 major revision - Major revision completed on June 8, 2022
2022 08 18 submit R1 - Submitted R1 on August 18, 2022
2022 08 28 Decision in Process - Decision is currently being processed as of August 28, 2022

angusduan 2022-09-01

2022.4.19 Submission
2022.5.09 Under review
2022.6.09 Under review

小饼干小心肝 2022-08-31

With Editor status unchanged, the time has changed three times...

JinZ 2022-08-22

Post on March 21, 2022;
With editor on March 23, 2022;
Under review on March 24, 2022;
First review comments received on May 30, 2022;
Sent back for revision on June 30, 2022;
Accepted on August 21, 2022;
It took 5 months, the speed depends on the reviewers.
This is my first article in this journal, submitted on October 20, 2021.
It has already gone through 3 reviews and it has been exactly 10 months since then, still waiting.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started