Verified Reviews - PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

伊尔萨 2023-06-06

If it wasn't an invitation to submit an article, did you submit a proposal at that time? Thank you.

伊尔萨 2023-06-06

Hello, I want to ask, is this a commissioned article from you?

科研民工1988 2021-09-30

2018.12.13 Submission
2019.3.15 Received email notification that the article has been sent for review
2019.9.8 Received reviewer comments, only one reviewer, major revision, raised many questions. The editor directly gave the option to reject and resubmit, suggesting that if the reviewer's requirements can be met, then reconsideration can be made.
2019.10.30 Revised and carefully modified, the reviewer's comments were very constructive and significantly improved the article. The response to the comments reached over 80 pages.
2020.2.7 Editor replied to reviewer comments, this time an additional reviewer was added. The previous reviewer agreed to the modifications, while the new reviewer suggested minor revisions. Editor GC Berry personally polished the language to further enhance it.
2020.3.1 Revised and carefully modified.
2020.5.16 Notified that the article has been accepted, the review process took over a year and a half.
Overall, the review speed of the journal is quite slow, and the editors and reviewers have strict requirements, making it difficult to submit. After all, it is a top-level review in the field of polymers, with an impact factor of over 20. Hopefully, this journal will continue to improve.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now