Verified Reviews - PROGRESS IN ORGANIC COATINGS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

景和 2023-07-27

Finally updated the status after 23 days, even slower than you. I hope everything goes well for us.

景和 2023-07-27

Finally updated the status.

Leona 2023-07-20

Don't worry, I finally got the status changed to "under review" after waiting for the editor to process it for 17 days...

小民咕咕 2023-07-17

2023.6.1 submitted
2023.6.4 with editor
2023.6.4 under review
2023.6.30 minor revision
2023.7.6 resubmitted
2023.7.10 under review
2023.7.17 accepted
Efficient and fast, wishing everyone a smooth submission process.

景和 2023-07-14

I'm just waiting for the editing update, hehe, Leona, could you go remind them?

Angchemist 2023-07-13

Posted on 4.20, major revisions were made on 6.1, reply comments were uploaded on 6.20, and accepted on 7.11.

Leona 2023-07-12

It's really slow! My article has been in the editor's hands for 10 days and still hasn't been processed...

景和 2023-07-09

This journal's processing speed is so slow.

backseven 2023-06-13

It took about one and a half months from submission to acceptance. It was fortunate that both reviewers provided minor revisions. I hope to continue maintaining the same level of quality.

唐伯虎点蚊香 2023-03-20

2023.3.16 submitted to journal.
2023.3.20 with editor.

Translated to English:
Submitted to journal on March 16, 2023.
With editor on March 20, 2023.

trouble1212 2023-03-01

I have had two articles published in this journal, and the editors are very friendly.

蛮吉 2023-01-11

Congratulations, little brother! I also just won an article.

liuzq68 2023-01-11

2022.12.17 Revision
2023.01.10 Accept
It might be a bit slow in the middle due to New Year's Day, but the journal is good!

蛮吉 2022-12-29

Finally accepted, it's considered quite fast, taking three and a half months. Submitted on September 11th, then received minor revisions on December 4th, and the revised version was sent back on the 25th, finally accepted on the 29th. Since it was directly accepted after the minor revisions, the time afterwards was quick. It took nearly three months from submission to receiving the minor revisions, which is not considered fast. If it were major revisions, it would probably take at least five months. Wishing the journal to continue improving, and wishing everyone good luck in all their endeavors.

liuzq68 2022-11-29

11.29 major revision

WLskull96 2022-11-20

Excuse me, how many reviewers does this journal have? I submitted it on October 3rd, and it is still under review as of November 20th?

奥德修斯 2022-11-14

11.4 Submit to journal
11.4 with editor
11.12 Changed to Submit to journal again
What's going on???

liuzq68 2022-11-08

20221108 Under review. It is estimated that the first two reviewers rejected and revised respectively, and the editor gave the opportunity to find another reviewer for review. It's a familiar situation, just like last time when it was rejected.

liuzq68 2022-11-07

The given text "20221106 RRC" does not have any specific meaning or context in English. It appears to be a combination of numbers and letters without any clear message.

liuzq68 2022-10-25

2022.10.24 under review translates to "Under review on October 24, 2022" in English.

liuzq68 2022-10-23

2022.10.11 Submission
2022.10.12 with editor
2022.10.23 Still with editor

吃不了葡萄皮 2022-10-12

Overall, it is not bad. After making the modifications, it was directly recorded. However, the review comments were slow, and I had to remind them twice. The presentation was well done, and the suggestions provided were also quite professional.

鸡蛋杀手 2022-10-11

May I ask which district this journal belongs to, and is there a layout fee?

鸡蛋杀手 2022-10-11

Excuse me, what district is this journal in?

2022-10-09

20221009, Edit

2022-10-08

20221007, submit

杰尼龟101 2022-09-22

7/08 Submitted to Journal
7/12 With editor
7/20 Under Review
7/24 Under Review
8/13 Required Reviews Completed
8/17 Revise
9/07 With editor
9/09 Under Review
9/10 Required Reviews Completed
9/11 9/10 Required Reviews Completed
9/12 accept

Translation:
7/08 Submitted to Journal
7/12 With editor
7/20 Under Review
7/24 Under Review
8/13 Required Reviews Completed
8/17 Revise
9/07 With editor
9/09 Under Review
9/10 Required Reviews Completed
9/11 9/10 Required Reviews Completed
9/12 accept

再睡五分钟 2022-09-16

Submitted on June 27th
Returned on July 20th for major revisions by two reviewers
Revised on August 18th
Returned on September 13th for minor revisions
Revised on September 15th
Accepted on September 16th
I think the review cycle is alright. I wish the journal continuous success!

东南小明王 2022-09-13

Hasn't it always been in Zone 2?

长江后浪 2022-09-09

It took 15 months.
After the first submission, it was rejected and there were over 40 questions raised by three reviewers.
The paper was then modified and additional experiments were conducted according to the reviewers' comments.
After 8 months, it was resubmitted.
The first review took one month, and there were over 20 more comments from the three reviewers.
The paper was modified for over a month and then submitted again.
The second review took one month, with two reviewers asking over 10 more questions.
Another month was spent on further modifications before resubmission.
In the third review, one reviewer raised a few more questions, and the editor also provided some.
After another half month of revisions, it was submitted again.
Finally, it was accepted, but when looking up at the moon, more than a year had already passed.
During the process, the paper was also submitted to a European journal on polymers but was rejected. It was then resubmitted to the current journal, which had risen from a second-tier to a first-tier journal.
It can be seen as an interpretation of how perseverance pays off.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started