CarnivalgGuy 2023-05-22

2023.2.6 Submit revised manuscript
2023.5.15 Paper accepted

After a year of ups and downs, one of the reviewers took too long to review, but fortunately, we finally received good news! May everyone graduate successfully!

miaohuihui 2023-05-08

10 Feb, 2023 - submitted to Journal
11 Feb, 2023 - with editor
12 Feb, 2023 - under review
05 Apr, 2023 - revised
24 Apr, 2023 - with editor
27 Apr, 2023 - under review
08 May, 2023 - accepted

The entire process from submission to acceptance took less than three months. The article is in the field of quantum system simulation. The efficiency is really high! Thank you Physica A for allowing my first scientific paper to be in the second tier. I will continue to submit in the future. I wish the journal continued success!

雨林木风 2023-04-26

The date has changed to April 4th, 23. I guess the reviewer has been changed.

雨林木风 2023-03-29

2023.3.24 submitted to journal
2023.3.26 with editor
2023.3.27 under review

zzzhui 2023-01-30

Do you need to modify the template corresponding to the magazine before submitting your contribution, or can you submit it without changing the template?

kaito 2023-01-22

Journal Submission Status
20230120: Submitted
20230121: With Editor
20230122: Under Review

DadaWang 2022-12-24

How long did the state with the editor last?

SCI_accepted 2022-12-16

Has the manuscript been reviewed for such a long time?

CarnivalgGuy 2022-12-13

2022.5.6 Submit manuscript
2022.12.9 Receive review comments (requested to submit revised manuscript by 2023.2.8)

All four experts provided positive feedback.

Cute_Bear 2022-10-03

Received at Editorial Office
29 May 2022
Article revised
17 Sep 2022
Article accepted for publication
2 Oct 2022
The review speed was quite fast, and I received the first round of review comments in nearly two months. The editor gave me 20 days to make revisions, but I couldn't tell if it required major or minor revisions, so I kept making changes until the last day. When I sent it back for reevaluation, it took about two weeks, and then I received the acceptance notification. I was very lucky ^-^
One of the reviewers' comments was difficult to address, but I did everything I could in the revised report and honestly explained the reasons for things I couldn't do. The outcome was still quite smooth.

zouhu 2022-09-22

The text translates to: "Able to accept interdisciplinary articles. The editor's speed is quite fast and responsible, and the speed depends on the reviewer."

shiyilang 2022-08-29

It has been 10 days, are you still with the editor? Has your situation changed?

wbyzs 2022-08-02

May I ask if it was sent for review after the repair? Or is it "with editor"?

12345_Lee 2022-07-29

Why can't the manuscript be uploaded? When uploading, there are many other options displayed, but there is no manuscript option.

阿宁宁宁宁 2022-07-25

There is an article on the dynamics of infectious diseases in Physics-A, but after submitting it, I was informed that it does not fit within the scope of the journal. It seems that the assigned editor is different, and their perspective on articles on mathematical biology is also different. These are just my personal observations and should only be taken as a reference.

12345_Lee 2022-07-17

Did you submit the long article? Will the article be directly rejected if it is too long?

zhuhejushi 2022-07-08

April 10th submission
May 22nd feedback on review
June 9th revised manuscript returned (editor requested submission of revised manuscript by June 12th)
June 23rd acceptance
June 26th online

二两圆 2022-06-16

How much is the layout fee approximately?

拼命发sci的科研狗 2022-05-30

May I ask if this journal has any page requirements? Will the article be rejected directly if it is too long?

zhuhejushi 2022-04-24

I am also with editor on the 11th, but I am still with editor now. What is your current status?

Jeffrey 2022-04-14

2022.4.11 submitted to journal
2022.4.11 With Editor
Hoping for good news, and smooth graduation!

bingo 2022-04-06

It took five months for feedback to be received. There were two reviewers, one of whom provided many suggestions for revision, while the other reviewer mentioned issues with my attitude and rejected the paper. The editor requested major revisions, which took two months to complete. After more than a month, the paper was resubmitted for review. In the second round, there was only one reviewer, as the other reviewer who had rejected the paper did not participate further. Although some of the revisions did not meet the reviewer's requirements, another round of major revisions was requested. After a month of further modifications, the paper was submitted for review again. Altogether, the entire process took around 11 months. Overall, the journal seemed relatively easy to get published in, but the review process was excessively long.

假老练 2021-11-12

I would like to ask, are you still with the editor? Has the status changed?

YYYYYYYY-Ms 2021-08-22

It has been over 20 days with the editor, is this normal?

PTP 2021-07-31

Actual 6.26 rework, pressed against the deadline, added a new section in the discussion part and supplemented the corresponding experiment.
Received second review comments on 7.30, minor revisions, all three reviewers expressed satisfaction with the revised version, no new comments, only made two suggestions. One of the reviewers believed that two questions from the previous comments were not answered, indicating dissatisfaction with the response. Overall, the editor's attitude should be positive, and the plan is to return the revisions within a week.

PTP 2021-06-07

2021.3.4 Submit submission
2021.4.28 First-round reply
There are three reviewers, one of whom is an expert in the field and provided many detailed suggestions for the introduction.
There were no major changes suggested for the methodology section.
Overall, it doesn't require major revisions, but there are suggestions to expand the discussion, so it will be treated as a major revision.
The revision was put on hold for half a month, and it will start on 5.17 with the plan to return by around 6.11.

AA华蓥山NU 2021-03-11

I heard that this journal accepts articles of various categories. I have been working on my article in "Physica A" for two months now, and the external review is about to be completed. I'm a bit anxious and would like to ask the experts who have been accepted before about the timeline and level of difficulty. Thank you!

玻尔兹曼·圈 2021-02-01

11.7 Submission
12.9 First review comments, two reviewers, one minor revision,
The other reviewer provided several comments, showing that the reviewers are very professional, and the issues raised are highly targeted.
1.9 Returned after one month of revision
1.30 Accepted