Verified Reviews - PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

sunshine9789 2023-05-27

Hello, I would like to ask about the WB raw data of PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH. Is it required that the target protein and internal reference come from the same membrane? Thank you.

行星 2023-02-17

May I ask what are the requirements for the uploaded original WB gel image?

qiohfdl 2023-01-04

Very efficient magazine, now very popular. There are some decent jobs that you can give a try.

Fyj!! 2022-12-10

It has been 8 days since the required reviews were completed. May I ask if there are any special circumstances? Does it mean that an external audit has been requested or that it has been rejected?

石小呆12138 2022-09-27

Reply: "【Mosin】 Posted: 2022-09-20 13:19:06
May I ask if providing three repeated uncropped images is necessary? Or is it sufficient to provide a representative uncropped image? Thank you very much and looking forward to your reply."

Regarding the upload of uncropped images, the journal did not specify any specific requirements. When I sent it for revisions, I provided three repeated results, merging each original blot strip with the corresponding marker, and then indicating the positions and molecular weights with arrows.

Mosin 2022-09-20

May I ask if uncropped images need to be provided three times or is it sufficient to provide a representative uncropped image? Thank you very much and I look forward to your reply.

石小呆12138 2022-09-14

Key points:
1. The review efficiency of the Pharmacological Research journal is very high. If the editor feels that the article's quality is not high, it will be rejected on the same day. If there is no decision in process on the day of submission or the next day, the article will basically enter the "Review invitations sent" stage, but the submission status will still show "With Editor". Only when the invited reviewers agree to review, the submission status will change to "Under Review".
2. The first review takes about one month. The editor and reviewers are friendly to Chinese authors. The language of the article has not been polished, but neither the editor nor the reviewers mentioned the issue of language in the revision.
3. When submitting the revised article, the system will require the upload of a graphical abstract figure and uncropped images of Western blots. It doesn't have to be the entire membrane.

石小呆12138 2022-09-14

5.3 Submitted to Journal
5.4 With Editor (This stage includes inviting reviewers time, only when reviewers accept the invitation will it enter the Review stage)
5.10 Under Review
6.10 Required Reviews Completed
6.12 Decision in Process
6.14 Major Revise (20 day deadline)
7.2 Resubmitted to Journal
7.3 With Editor (This stage includes inviting reviewers time, only when reviewers accept the invitation will it enter the Review stage)
7.11 Under Review
7.20 Required Reviews Completed
7.20 Decision in Process
7.23 Accept
7.23 Pre-proof online (DOI )
7.27 Final version published online
8.23 Indexed in Web of Science Core Collection.

robinchen95 2021-04-29

Received 30 January 2021, Major revision 3 March 2021, Revised 2 April 2021, Accepted 12 April 2021, Available online 16 April 2021, Proofs 22 April 2021.

Clinical observational study submitted, the reviewer's comments were very pertinent, the questions raised were clear and specific recommendations for resolution were provided. After one major revision, the paper was accepted directly. The process was fast and efficient, and there were many articles from Chinese authors, making it a friendly environment.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More