Xin Ying^* 2023-06-08

25 May Manuscript Submitted
31 May Out for Review

Translation:

25 May - The manuscript has been submitted.
31 May - The manuscript is currently being reviewed.

airkiss 2023-03-07

20 May 2022 Submission Created
20 Jun 2022 Out for Review
09 Aug 2022 Substantial revisions
06 Sep 2022 Out for Review
01 Oct 2022 Substantial revisions
05 Dec 2022 Out for Review
05 Jan 2023 Minor revisions
26 Jan 2023 Out for Review
24 Feb 2023 Minor revisions
04 Mar 2023 Out for Review
06 Mar 2023 Accepted
The review process is rigorous, and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the modifications were not directly accurate, resulting in multiple external reviews and repeated revisions.

lanchen 2022-11-23

May I ask how much time you have spent on revising the manuscript? I don't have a deadline for returning it either.

qnhammer 2022-07-25

Fast review, submitted in early March, received initial review results in mid-May, no deadline for revision feedback was given, accepted after three weeks of receiving revised feedback.

airkiss 2022-04-07

22 November 2021 Manuscript Submitted
22 November 2021 With Editor
26 November 2021 Out for Review
08 February 2022 Revision Required
28 February 2022 Revised Manuscript
28 March 2022 Accepted
The speed is acceptable, and the review process is very meticulous.

06112458 2022-03-07

Just get used to it. This journal is incredibly slow, at least half a year or more.

wtma 2022-01-10

In 3 more days, it will have been 1 month in the editor's hands, and it still shows "with editor". The foreign vacation should be over by now. I wanted to ask if this status has been submitted for review or if I should remind them about it.

zhutou255 2021-06-30

2020 IF=2.356 translates to "2020 impact factor is 2.356" in English.

zhutou255 2021-06-03

The paper was submitted at the end of March and received reviewer comments in early May. There were two reviewers, one of whom rejected the paper, claiming that it lacked innovation and citing a reference. However, it seems that the reviewer did not carefully read the paper, as there were significant differences. The second reviewer accepted the revised version but raised 11 detailed questions. In the end, the editor rejected the paper. The journal's review process was relatively fast. I made revisions and responded to the comments of both reviewers and resubmitted the paper.

Looking at the trend, the journal's impact factor is increasing and it is uncertain if it will reach 2 this year. However, it can be considered a potential stock in the field of particles.