啸聚山林 2023-04-17

Submission history:
Submitted on November 22, 2022, and sent for review on the same day.
First review returned on February 14, 2023 (major and minor revisions), editor requested major revisions.
Returned for revision on March 6, 2023, waited for a week at the editorial office, sent a letter to urge submission, and submitted for review on March 14.
Review returned on April 10, 2023 (strong request from the reviewer for revisions based on their perspective + another reviewer accepted), editor provided minor revisions.
Returned for revision on April 15, 2023, rejected the reviewer's revision suggestions and provided detailed explanations and evidence, returned on Saturday night at 12 o'clock.
Accepted on April 16, 2023, at 8 o'clock in the morning.
Overall evaluation: The editor's efficiency is extremely high. Palaeo's characteristics may be more focused on papers with relatively mature data and understanding, and they generally accept them. Innovation may not be the most important factor. For reference only.

北油沉积小陈 2023-03-30

Is this edit targeting me? It's really strange.

啸聚山林 2023-03-24

I waited in this status for a week, then followed up, and it was sent for review the next day. It's probably an issue with the editor.

北油沉积小陈 2023-03-23

What's the news? It's been two months already. I've sent four emails to the editorial department, but the assigned editor has published the revised manuscripts submitted after mine. They haven't dealt with mine yet. Sob.

啸聚山林 2023-03-07

Hasn't it been dealt with for a month? Is there a result now?

北油沉积小陈 2023-02-27

"Submitted two months ago, after the first revision, I resubmitted to the journal on the third day of the Lunar New Year. It has been in the 'Revision Submitted to Journal' status for a month. Has anyone else experienced this situation?"

Dr. 2022-12-21

The review process is fast, and the editors are very efficient.

啸聚山林 2022-11-25

May I ask how fast is the editing process? How long does the review process usually take?

bearkuku 2022-11-16

The efficiency is indeed quite fast. In total, it has been edited 3 times, each time taking about 24-5 days.

The characteristic of this magazine is that it particularly focuses on the highlights of the articles. If the article has a novel concept or breakthrough content, even if it is slightly lacking, it will be given the opportunity to gradually improve.

songgg 2022-09-15

6.23 Submission
8.29 Review completed, two minor revisions, editor gave middle revision
9.7 Returned after modifications
9.13 Accepted

菲菲 2021-12-11

Wow, it feels like the process of submitting for youyou has been a bit bumpy. I'm curious about what kind of research youyou is doing? Why has it been so difficult? Can you give some advice on submitting?

菲菲 2021-12-11

Preparing to submit.

辰砂 2021-11-25

San Gu is also considered a traditional and well-established journal, with high recognition in the industry. The manuscript was submitted on April 29th, and it took about until May 20th for it to be sent for review. The external review comments were received on July 5th, requiring two major revisions. The revised manuscript was submitted on August 20th, but then there was another delay of about a month at the editor's office. Around September 15th, it was sent for review again. The second review comments were received on October 12th, requiring minor revisions. The revised manuscript was submitted on October 28th for the second round of review. On November 9th, it was accepted, and it was published online on the 15th. Overall, it was a relatively smooth submission process. The reviewers' comments were professional and detailed, providing significant help to improve the paper. However, the Chief Editor's speed was slightly slow.

寒武纪学渣投SCI 2021-11-24

The article you have been longing for, was rejected within seconds with the reason: The quality of the paper does not meet the review standards. *Sigh* My confidence has been shattered...

那些年那些人 2021-02-18

2020.02.04 First submission, received major revisions after one and a half months, returned within one month, received rejection after one and a half months, editor encourages resubmission;
2020.07.06 Second resubmission, two reviewers, one recommended rejection and one minor revision, editor encouraged resubmission after rejection;
2020.09.01 Third resubmission, received notification in late December, major revisions, returned after one month, received prompt feedback, minor revisions, completed and proofread within a week, received acceptance notification eight days later. Later selected as an Invited Research Paper
The first SCI paper was quite tumultuous, hoping the second one goes smoothly.

Zou-Yu 2021-02-12

Posted on December 4, 2020, it was under review on the same day. It completed the external review on January 8, 2021 (with revisions in China) and was revised on February 11. The next day, on February 12, it was accepted. I received the good news of its acceptance on the first day of the Chinese New Year, which happened to be my fourth SCI paper as the first author. I'm happy!