Verified Reviews - OPTIK
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

wshang 2022-08-24

There has been a situation like this before, constantly with the editor for almost a year, and in the end, it was directly accepted.

luckyli 2022-08-24

I sent emails to both the editor and the journal, but have not received any response. Should I consider withdrawing the submission?

今天也要加油鸭 2022-08-23

Approximately one month with the editor, and then it will be submitted for review.

2022liu 2022-08-21

Contact ijleo@elsevier.com
Each journal has many editors, and there are always a few editors who are too busy or forgetful. You can contact the journal.

luckyli 2022-08-21

May I ask how long you have been in the "with editor" status?

今天也要加油鸭 2022-08-11

Time of submission: March 5, 2022
Approximately one week with editor
More than two months for review
One month for revisions
One month for re-review
Revisions again
Complete revisions within seven days and submit
Acceptance within approximately five days

luckyli 2022-08-11

6.13 submitted to journal
6.15 with editor
Still not under review

Xiaoaqiao 2022-08-05

7.6 submitted to journal - This means that a document or article has been sent to a journal for consideration and possible publication.

7.7 with editor - This indicates that the document or article is currently being reviewed and assessed by an editor.

8.4 under review - This means that the document or article is currently being evaluated and analyzed by reviewers or experts in the relevant field.

RVP_Taurus 2022-08-05

4.20 Submitted to Journal
4.21 Under Review
5.03 Under Review
5.22 Under Review
7.13 Under Review
7.18 Under Review
7.31 Minor Revision
8.04 Revision Submitted to Journal
8.05 Accepted
Thank you very much to the editor and reviewers for giving me the opportunity. The first review process was indeed torturous, but it was accepted directly after the revisions. Good luck to everyone.

INNERPEACE 2022-08-03

Update submission information, first review is slow, second review is fast. Submitted on 3.24, under review on 4.1, major revision on 7.23, revision submitted on 7.31, accepted on 8.3.

INNERPEACE 2022-08-03

Update, the first trial is slow, the second trial is fast, acceptance is fast. Students who want speed should be cautious when applying.

INNERPEACE 2022-08-03

Update submission information, first review is slow, second review is fast.
3.24 submitted
4.1 under review
7.23 major revision
7.31 revision submitted
8.3 accept

科研的小太阳 2022-08-01

Recently, the speed of manuscript review has become much faster. It seems that the journal is also undergoing reform. One month for initial review and half a month for re-review is quite reasonable. Hopefully, it will be able to reach the finish line within 3 months.

INNERPEACE 2022-07-31

7.23 major revision - This means that a significant revision was made or is required on July 23rd.

7.31 revision submitted - This states that a revision was submitted on July 31st.

小羽毛 2022-07-23

June 28, 2021 submission
July 22, 2021 rejection
Submission rejected after review.

小羽毛 2022-07-23

Apr 25, 2022 Submission
May 04, 2022 Rejection
The review was rejected

小羽毛 2022-07-23

Mar 1, 2022 - Submitted
May 12, 2022 - Modified
May 28, 2022 - Accepted

提莫队长正在待命 2022-07-22

It has been about five days since I submitted it, and the status has changed from "submitted" to "with editor," and then it is "under review." I don't know how long I have to wait from here.

RVP_Taurus 2022-07-19

The submission is still under review after three months +1, with the date being updated four times. I don't know why it's taking so long recently. I am anxiously and cautiously submitting it.

INNERPEACE 2022-07-18

It has been almost 4 months since submission, and it is still under review. I sent a reminder a few days ago, and the editor replied in official language, saying it is still under review... Urgent graduating students, please think carefully before submitting.

95后 2022-07-11

Hello, how should we choose the section for studying micro-nano optical devices?

2022liu 2022-06-28

Transferred from the editorial board information: Optik has an impact factor of 2.84 (an increase of 16% compared to last year) and is ranked 42nd out of 101 optical journals (Q2). The estimated IF for 2023 is 3.2.

INNERPEACE 2022-06-09

3.24 submit - The submission is due on March 24th.
4.1 under review - It is currently being reviewed and evaluated as of April 1st.

ouou1997 2022-05-02

The review process was a bit slow, but in the end, it was directly accepted and published quickly.

RVP_Taurus 2022-04-20

Excuse me, has the problem been solved? I also encountered the same issue. You have been sending me these emails for two consecutive days.

Yang Shoubing 2022-04-18

How is the review speed of this journal? How long does it usually take to get accepted?

2022liu 2022-04-16

Abstract: (Objective) A few sentences. (Methods) A few sentences. (Results) A few sentences.

It is preferable to retain the words (Objective), (Methods), and (Results), and enclose them in parentheses for clarity.

2022liu 2022-04-16

Abstract: (objective) A few sentences. (methods) A few sentences. (result) A few sentences.

li784606 2022-04-16

Same question,,, After each paper submission, it is sent back to the author on the next day. At this point, the status of "submissions being processed (1)" changes to (0). The email states that the abstract was not written according to the format of "objective, methods, result," but the abstract has already been modified and resubmitted twice before. Now, it has been sent back to the author for the third time. Do you know why this is happening?

nuliya 2022-04-05

After each paper submission, the submissions are sent back to the author the next day. At this point, the status of the submissions being processed changes from (1) to (0). The email states that the abstract was not written according to the format (objective, methods, result), even though the abstract has already been modified and resubmitted twice before. Now, it has been sent back to the author for the third time. Do you know why this is happening?

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started