Verified Reviews - OPTIK
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

wang410 2023-02-15

From submission to acceptance, it took a whole year.

深水之城 2023-02-14

How long does "under review" usually take?

95后 2023-02-14

Already accepted for publication.

单曲循环 2023-02-10

Brother, is there any change in the status of your article now? Did you receive any response after editing with the editor?

dawson_1111 2023-02-06

What happened to my brothers later on?

19猪猪侠 2023-02-01

September 15, 2022 Post
November 3, 2022 Major repair
December 21, 2022 Minor repair
January 10, 2022 Receive

luckyli 2023-01-03

The time for under review has been updated five times already, is it because they cannot find a reviewer?

陈大栗 2022-12-12

Submitted on January 6th this year, resubmitted after revision on December 7th and finally accepted... because we couldn't find a reviewer, the review process took 8 months. Thankfully, there is a happy ending.

wshang 2022-12-10

My manuscript review was fast. I received opinions from two reviewers within one and a half months, and neither of them suggested rejection. One reviewer requested revisions, while the other raised some sharp questions. However, the responsible editor decided to reject it due to the sharp nature of the questions. The scientific management editor suggested making revisions based on the two reviewers' opinions and submitting it to Heliyon (IF = 3.776, Article Publishing Charge required). The advantage is that there won't be a need for a second round of review. Considering the required fee, I decided not to transfer it and instead, I will carefully revise it according to the reviewers' opinions and add more experiments to submit to a better journal. Optik's management is becoming more standardized, and its level is continuously improving.

我接工地 2022-12-02

Me too, it's so trashy.

阿柳gogo呀 2022-12-02

Currently still with editor

Xiaoaqiao 2022-11-29

2022 07 06 Submission
2022 10 29 Repair
2022 11 13 Submission
2022 11 29 Acceptance

我接工地 2022-11-28

How is your thesis going now?

大河马阿布纳 2022-11-22

2022.9.25 Submitted.
2022.10.13 Returned for revision.
2022.10.15 Accepted.

阿柳gogo呀 2022-11-17

The reviewing speed of this journal is very slow. There has been no movement or progress since 11.6 with the editor.

酷炙炙 2022-10-31

After both reviewers have completed their reviews, it has been more than a week in the "Required Reviews Completed" status. Does anyone know what the situation is?

chenyuxin997 2022-10-26

Does it mean that my "decision in process" is no longer possible?

chenyuxin997 2022-10-26

Excuse me, does it mean it's hopeless when my status changes directly to "decision in process"?

95后 2022-10-18

under review, the editor will check for plagiarism and other operations, the next step is to submit for review.

lihui_thz 2022-10-16

May I ask what is the status after "with editor" now? Mine shows "Decision in Process."

95后 2022-10-15

7.13 with editor
8.18 under review
Could you please tell me how to urge the submission? I couldn't find the editor's email.
In the system, is the email in the Action Links useful? Or should I directly reply to the email tracking the paper?

圆滚滚 2022-10-11

May I ask if your paper has been submitted for review now?

95后 2022-10-08

It has been three months since my initial review and it has not finished yet.

顺顺&朵朵 2022-09-27

The review process took seven months, and the second review took one month. Fortunately, it was finally accepted.

寒雪1 2022-09-13

The speed is still very fast. Editing that step is not dragging or delaying.

小顾1 2022-09-13

This journal is extremely disgusting, everyone should be cautious when submitting manuscripts. It is quick to send the manuscript for review, but the remaining process is a long wait, with no one accepting the review. I waited for 4 months before someone finally accepted the review, but even the reviewer was irresponsible. They completed the review in a few days, directly rejecting it without even reading the article, only relying on their own opinions. Then the editor kept delaying, and finally sent a reminder letter to reject me directly. It wasted 5 months, causing me to miss the evaluation for a national award. I thank this journal and wish it would close down soon. They are completely irresponsible. Those in a hurry to submit manuscripts, please do not submit to this journal, I am truly speechless.

科研打工人 2022-09-06

Hello, may I ask if you are open source?

2022liu 2022-08-25

Your situation is relatively rare. Currently, there are very few instances where someone has been with an editor for such a long time. I suggest contacting Elsevier Publishing, as they have an online customer service. The "contact us" section should have the information you need.

Anboyu 2022-08-25

6.30 Submission
7.30 Feedback with revision suggestions from two reviewers
8.2 Revised manuscript returned
8.20 Accepted

luckyli 2022-08-25

I have been with my editor for over two months, but they don't reply to my emails.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started