mzwa 2023-08-01

Two reviewers were very serious and their comments were very helpful. The speed was also fast. After careful modification, it was accepted and became available online a few days later.

2023.4.9 submitted
2023.6.11 major revisions for the first review
2023.6.30 revised
2023.7.20 minor revisions for the second review
2023.7.25 revised (I delayed it due to personal reasons, it should have been completed in a day or two)
2023.7.26 accepted
2023.8.1 available online

ws 2023-07-27

May I ask where to find the LaTeX template for this journal?

eleven 2023-07-24

The impact factor has dropped too drastically, it is even lower than the previous year. I'm crying.

钰宸 2023-07-12

2023.06.04 Under Review
2023.06.10 Required Reviews Completed
2023.07.09 Decision in Process
2023.07.12 Accept

Translation:
2023.06.04 Under Review
2023.06.10 Required Reviews Completed
2023.07.09 Decision in Process
2023.07.12 Accept

xiaozhuxiaoxu 2023-06-30

May I ask, after your second revision, did you receive it directly or did you first send it under review to the original reviewer before accepting it?

小许XFF 2023-06-30

Excuse me, has your manuscript been revised and sent back for a second review by the reviewer?

蜗牛喔 2023-06-26

06/02/2023 submitted
06/02/2023 with editor
06/04/2023 Under Review
06/18/2023 Under Review

Translation:
06/02/2023 submitted
06/02/2023 with editor
06/04/2023 Under Review
06/18/2023 Under Review

小许XFF 2023-06-13

May I ask if you need to upload both the highlighted manuscript and the clean manuscript after your minor revisions, or just separately upload a single manuscript?

小许XFF 2023-06-12

May I ask if it is necessary to submit a highlighted version of the revised manuscript when submitting to OLEN journal? I did not find any instructions in the submission system.

钰宸 2023-06-02

2023.05.21 Required Reviews Completed
2023.05.27 Required Reviews Completed It feels like there are more than 4.
2023.05.28 Decision in Process
2023.05.29 Major Revision 1 rejected 1 accepted 1 revised 1 major revision, given by the editor
2023.06.02 Revision Submitted to Journal
2023.06.02 With Editor

时悟豆 2023-05-29

There are a total of 4 reviewers.

钰宸 2023-05-24

How many reviewers are there in total, please?

钰宸 2023-05-24

May I ask how many reviewers are there in total?

时悟豆 2023-05-20

Update:
2023-4-12-----Decision in Process
2023-4-12-----Major Revision
2023-5-01-----Submitted Revised Draft
2023-5-02-----With Editor
2023-5-02-----Under Review
2023-5-09-----Required Reviews Completed
2023-5-17-----Decision in Process
2023-5-18-----Accept
The entire process took 3 months.

钰宸 2023-05-19

2023.05.03 With Editor
2023.05.07 Under Review
2023.05.17 Required Reviews Completed
It appears that three reviewers have accepted the review, and currently, two have returned their reviews.

钰宸 2023-05-09

Deliberate procrastination shouldn't be the case. Is your field of study niche? Looking at the comments in this journal, it seems like they find reviewers quickly. However, not allowing withdrawal of a submission is excessive; it feels like a waste of time for everyone involved.

钰宸 2023-05-09

Personally, I feel that it has no effect.

MizuotoAsuka 2023-05-09

On average, I review 10 papers per year. The submission process takes 4 months, and none of them have been accepted for review. I have sent two reminders, but received irrelevant responses. On the third reminder, I directly requested withdrawal of the paper, but it was not withdrawn. On the fourth reminder, it has been 6 months since the submission, and the paper still hasn't been withdrawn. Only one paper has been reviewed, and I am very frustrated. I will not review for this journal in the future. I feel like they are intentionally delaying my publication.

zxc1988 2023-05-09

Elsevier requires all authors to verify their co-authorship by confirming their agreement to publish the article if it is accepted. It is also acceptable to verify after acceptance.

钰宸 2023-05-03

Brothers, may I ask if it is necessary for all individuals to verify the confirmation of the co-author link? Will it affect the submission and evaluation if not verified?

钰宸 2023-05-02

05/02/2023 Submitted to Journal

This text is already in English.

那必须是永远不reject 2023-04-27

Posted on Feb 16, repaired on Apr 10, accepted on Apr 22. Two reviewers, extremely high work efficiency.

时悟豆 2023-04-12

2023-2-19 -----Submitted to Journal
2023-2-20 -----With Editor
2023-2-26 -----Under Review
2023-4-11 -----Required Reviews Completed

Translated:
2023-2-19 -----Submitted to Journal
2023-2-20 -----With Editor
2023-2-26 -----Under Review
2023-4-11 -----Required Reviews Completed

七七132 2023-03-11

2022.09 Submission
2023.03 Accepted after revision
Because the Chinese New Year holiday is relatively long, the editors are very accommodating, and the reviewers' opinions are also very professional. They prefer optical algorithms that involve some innovative ideas.

shijiashuo 2023-01-14

Initial Date Submitted 10/14/2022
Date Final Disposition Set 01/10/2023 (Accept)

First review takes two months, and second review takes half a month. The journal prefers innovative research in the field of optics with experimental validation.

eleven 2022-12-19

9.26 Submission
10.03 Review
11.14 First review
12.02 Revision
12.19 Acceptance

There are a total of two reviewers, and their questions are very professional, which greatly helps improve the quality of the article.

storm 2022-11-30

To be honest, it's really low to say this, but the reason for my rejection was a lack of theoretical analysis, and I intentionally skipped this part because I found it troublesome. Also, I was insulted by a reviewer of this journal before, so it's normal to have animosity. However, the editor is still responsible and recommended me for resubmission, and it's almost certain that I will be accepted now. It's just that the reviewer is an idiot. As for the quality issue of the journal itself, there are good articles, but at the same time, there are also very trashy articles. However, due to the good writing skills and detailed content, even without any innovative points, they can still be accepted. The main purpose of me submitting to this journal is to find that reviewer who insulted me before, as I couldn't let it go.

eleven 2022-11-27

Congratulations! May I ask, is there a corresponding template for this revised version? The editor wants us to follow the journal's formatting guidelines, but we couldn't find a template. So, I would like to ask those experienced in submitting articles if they have any advice. Sorry for bothering you.

sojustso 2022-11-26

I would like to ask, where can I see the status of invited reviewers?

爱科研的小悦 2022-11-10

The proposed modifications are very pertinent. The reviewer is very meticulous. A total of 35 suggestions for major revisions were made, covering a wide range of aspects.