Verified Reviews - Ocean Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

左耳朵进水 2023-08-07

Hahaha, I know who you are.

微微安 2023-08-05

2023.8.5 Update: accepted. (Editor likes to make decisions on weekends?)
Also, the email mentioned that proofreading is required for language polishing. Do any fellow students have similar experiences? How should I handle it?

udhsi 2023-08-04

Your time is too long.

udhsi 2023-08-04

It has been two months since the first submission, and it is still under review. There are two reviewers, one of whom has already completed the review in the first month, while the other has yet to provide any updates. Should I remind them or am I afraid of rejection?

小H24 2023-08-04

Yes, the second review took more than 7 months. At the end of February, it was indicated that the second review was completed, but there were no further updates. In March, I followed up and then got accepted.

udhsi 2023-08-04

May I ask how to send an email to the official Esveille account?

udhsi 2023-08-04

Did you not remind me to submit the article for a year?

kingsleyyu 2023-08-03

July 25th, RRC is also waiting anxiously.

微微安 2023-08-03

First review for repairs, no mention of major or minor repairs.
As of July 24, 2023, the status is RRC.
Until now, there has been no news as of August 3.
May I ask: Will the editor make a direct decision (reject or accept)? It has been almost two weeks, is there a higher probability of a second revision?
Update on August 5, 2023: accepted. (Does the editor prefer making decisions on weekends?)
In addition: The acceptance email mentioned that proofreading for language improvement is required. Do any fellow students have a similar experience? How should it be handled?

kingtonali 2023-08-01

2023.07.17 Major revision: Two reviewers have provided a total of 16 comments.
2023.07.31 Revised and sent back to the editor. Took 14 days to make changes and added a lot of data results. Hoping for the reviewers' approval. Let's hope for an early acceptance.

头发保住 2023-07-22

Have all the brothers who have undergone the second round of RRC been recruited? Were there any rejections? It has been 9 days for me, and I'm getting anxious.

枫桥夜泊哒哒哒 2023-07-20

On the 17th, I will be with the editor, and it is still now.

枫桥夜泊哒哒哒 2023-07-18

Brother, how long have you been with the editor?

枫桥夜泊哒哒哒 2023-07-18

Uh, hope in, please, please.

吞风吻雨 2023-07-18

There are very few journals on ocean engineering, and most of the references found in searches are from these few journals. However, the self-citation rate of Journal 34 is indeed high. Is there any solution? I hope it will get better and better.
April 25: Submission
May 14: First review comments
June 2: Revision
July 9: Second review comments
July 16: Revision
July 16: Acceptance
The reviewers are very professional, and their comments show that they have carefully reviewed the paper. The suggestions they provided are also very pertinent.

jq525 2023-07-17

Did you wait for seven months for the second trial?

太空挖矿 2023-07-13

7.6proof, already online.

头发保住 2023-07-13

"You are not an ordinary cow."

ldamienrice 2023-07-12

May I ask how long it takes to accept the proof?

RAINBOWNIGHT 2023-07-12

In the second half of the first year of my master's program, I wrote my first article. The workload and guidance from my supervisor were great, and I am the first author.
Just got accepted today, and I want to share my journey:
From 2023-02-17 to 2023-05-16 (14 weeks), I wrote the paper and submitted it.
From 2023-06-12 (4 weeks), I made 2 minor revisions and 1 major revision.
On 2023-06-30 (3 weeks), I submitted the modifications.
On 2023-07-12 (2 weeks), it was accepted.

殇25 2023-07-11

Submit changes: June 23, 2023 (The time is tight, but luckily it was completed on schedule)
Post-audit after modification: June 24, 2023
Accept invitation: June 25, 2023
Accept another invitation: June 26, 2023
One completion: July 2, 2023
Another completion: July 3, 2023, same day as RRC
Receive: July 8, 2023 (Noticed a pattern, editors like to make final decisions on Saturdays)
Well, that's the process. Waiting is agonizing, but luckily the results are good. I sincerely hope that everyone's wishes come true!

殇25 2023-07-11

Send it out for everyone to use as a reference, hoping to help everyone!
I think three months is already very fast, special thanks to Ocean Engineering, hoping the journal will get better and better!
First submission: April 18, 2023
External review: April 24, 2023 (Changed from "with editor" to "Under Review", took 6 days)
Sent to 2+ reviewers
First reviewer accepted invitation: May 1, 2023
Second reviewer accepted invitation: May 4, 2023
Revisions: June 3, 2023
Revision deadline: June 24, 2023 (Given 21 days, one reviewer asked for additional experiments and changes in the article's structure, and another reviewer)

你说然后呢 2023-07-01

The official of Aisville has reminded twice, and directly recorded.

中中中!! 2023-06-29

It has been 5 days since the first trial, and still no news. Is this normal?

中中中!! 2023-06-29

After 3 days of submission, it is under review. After 7 days, the required review is completed. The required review completed status has been maintained for 5 days now, and I am feeling extremely anxious.

qqqq2021 2023-06-29

Does anyone know what "update from the second review in the 'Reviewer comments to author' section" means? Does it mean making further changes based on the second set of comments?

皮卡丘,使用十万伏特 2023-06-28

The self-citation rate of 34% is expected to enter the early warning list soon.

皮卡丘,使用十万伏特 2023-06-28

I don't know how to say it, but be cautious about investing in this one in the future. The amount of articles published this year is too overwhelming.

kingtonali 2023-06-28

2023.06.27 under review, hoping for a quick and smooth review process and successful inclusion.

I_AM_YP 2023-06-27

3 months, first review, the reviewer's comments were okay, but it was still rejected. It's too slow, the rejection should have been quicker, it's been dragging on until now. I've seen the published papers, the quality is really not good, they are all mediocre. I don't know what's going on.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now