Verified Reviews - NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

q1q 2023-08-08

Do you need a plagiarism check? Is there a requirement for a 30% similarity rate?

Wanzhenyu 2023-02-10

The editor rejected it directly after three weeks, saying it doesn't meet the criteria. I guess they are probably selecting the best among the best, after all, I am just a novice.

科研白菜 2022-08-28

It will probably take a few days for the owner to receive it after the minor repairs are done.

鱼肠 2022-07-25

Just a regular Elsevier publishing company template will do.

zhy1021 2022-04-06

I want to ask, how can I find the template for a journal?

鱼肠 2022-03-05

The time taken for the second submission was similar to the first time of hiring, and three months after the second submission, minor revisions were requested. After making the revisions, I quickly received the acceptance notification. I feel that even for a partial differential model, some innovation is required. Being in Zone 2 all year round is still very stable.

初入数学界的小学生 2021-10-07

Hello. I recently submitted an article to this journal as well. The first review was done by one reviewer, and their feedback was quite positive, but they requested additional content. I submitted the revised manuscript on September 20th, but on the 22nd, they asked for the submission of the tex file (the first review email did not mention that the tex file needed to be submitted after revisions). They also mentioned that the process cannot proceed without the tex file. I'm not sure if you also had the same experience. It has been half a month since I submitted the revised manuscript, and the status is still "With Editor," but the date changed once on September 27th, and the status remains the same. I'm not sure how long your second review took.

Sir Lang 2021-09-19

The manuscript review is rigorous, and many important results in this field have been published in this journal.

hanxiao 2021-01-21

Overall, the journal is good. It requires a certain level of innovation, otherwise there is a high possibility of rejection. The reviewers are also responsible and ask great questions! Over 180 articles are published in a year, contrary to what some people say about excessive low-quality submissions!

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started