天边残梦 2023-07-18

2023.01.29 submitted
2023.02.09 awaiting referee reports
2023.06.12 Major Revision
2023.07.02 submitted
2023.07.05 awaiting referee reports
2023.07.17 provisionally accepted
2023.07.18 formally accepted

I highly praise the reviewers of this journal. Their comments are all very professional, and one reviewer even provided feedback down to the page and line number, pointing out specific issues.

漫天星辰花 2023-02-28

Normally, it takes over two months for the review process. This journal is just very slow.

漫天星辰花 2023-02-28

It is a very good journal. Our senior colleagues have submitted articles to it before, and the reviewers are very professional. The review process of this journal is still very strict, not very easy.

天边残梦 2023-02-17

2023.01.29 submit
2023.02.09 awaiting referee reports

天边残梦 2023-01-30

Just invested today, hoping to win.

optics 皮卡丘 2022-12-31

If you have waited too long, you can send a reminder letter to urge them. It is very likely that the editor has forgotten.

DK不吃榴莲 2022-11-24

It has been almost two months since I submitted, but there has been no news. I don't know why.

木木不是木头啦 2022-10-29

I am also appealing. There are two reviewers, one agrees and one disagrees, but the editor rejected it directly. I have already appealed, and the editor is still finding new reviewers.

optics 皮卡丘 2022-10-21

So, when you submitted your contribution, did it get rejected by the system? And then did you appeal?

Geng0912 2022-09-13

The overall process, from the speed of review to publication, feels quite fast. Two reviewers provided suggestions, which were not overly strict, and the paper was accepted right after responding. However, the page charges are not cheap, so it is still recommended to submit.

honestly 2022-08-02

May I ask, after a submission, if it shows "awaiting decision" for two to three days, and then changes to "Awaiting Referee Reports" for another two to three days, does it mean that it has been sent for external review or that the editorial department has directly rejected the submission?

小齐的七 2022-06-07

The editor is very professional. One of the three reviewers has been entangled in a seemingly important but irrelevant issue. The other two have agreed to publish the article after two rounds of review. We directly sent an email to the editor-in-chief to appeal, and the next day it was accepted. This journal favors work with solid theoretical foundations. It has a good reputation in Europe. At the same time, when familiar professors in the department were chatting, they mentioned that the rejection process for high-quality papers is more complicated and requires at least two editors to deliberate. If a paper is rejected after their deliberation, it indicates that the editorial department is hesitant...

optics 皮卡丘 2022-06-06

What the person upstairs said is all correct. If this magazine is rejected by the editorial department, it will quickly appear in the "awaiting decision" status after submission. However, it takes a few days before they send you an email rejecting it without review (this is also a very strange thing!).

optics 皮卡丘 2022-05-30

I feel like checking this is useless!!!

optics 皮卡丘 2022-05-30

It feels useless to check this.

optics 皮卡丘 2022-05-30

Does anyone know if "awaiting decision" means rejection after submission? Why don't they reject immediately, but instead drag it out for a few days?????????

optics 皮卡丘 2022-05-13

May I ask how long it takes to review?

Dynamics 2021-12-21

Initial review by three reviewers, two of whom agreed to publish after minor revisions, while the other reviewer seemed to have rejected the paper without even reading it, using only jargon that made no sense. Therefore, we promptly appealed, and the editor quickly found new reviewers. The new reviewers also recommended publishing after minor revisions, which were submitted two weeks later. The paper was accepted over 20 days later. Personally, I feel that NJP's handling speed is very fast, and the editor and staff of the editorial department are very professional and responsible. I have published multiple times in NJP, and I am sharing this experience for everyone's reference. I also recommend submitting suitable manuscripts to NJP, as NJP is worthy of your trust.

optics 皮卡丘 2021-11-23

I would like to ask, since PRA and NJP are different publishers, how would you suggest switching submissions?

buster 2021-11-23

Feel that the field of two-dimensional materials cannot compare to PRB and APL.

逸飞 2021-07-11

I just submitted two days ago. How long will it take for your paper to be reviewed?

科研仕子小马 2021-07-07

After submission, the status changes to "Awaiting Referee Reports". This status does not mean it is under review, but rather it is in the hands of the editor. To confirm whether it is under review, please check the IOP website. It is very difficult.

EchoGee 2021-07-02

NJP belongs to IOP, PR series belongs to APS. It's a bit strange that you are grouping NJP with PR journals and not including any AIP journals.

TigerYang 2021-04-16

Very good journal, the reviewers are all very familiar with the research field of the authors, the review process is very strict, the review comments are very professional, the review speed is also very fast, I hope NJP will continue to improve!