wuahsnd 2023-08-06

Is the status viewed on the official website?

wuahsnd 2023-08-06

There is no reason to reject it so quickly. It should be because the scope of submission does not match.

wuahsnd 2023-08-06

The EM system does not have a submission portal or a status inquiry option. Only the official website has these features. Submissions made through the official website are always subject to peer review.

大小小 2023-08-04

I want to ask the original poster, what else needs to be done after receiving it? Do we need to adjust the format or something similar?

大小小 2023-08-04

I would like to ask everyone, what else needs to be done after accepting?

kksiz 2023-08-02

Same question, the Springer submission template is the most absurd one I have ever seen. The format difference for Neural Processing Letters is too big. I would like to ask if it is okay to submit directly according to the original format.

hua12 2023-08-02

Could you please explain how the status on your system has changed? What is the next state after peer review?

六出 2023-08-02

I would like to ask everyone, when submitting a manuscript, is it necessary to use the corresponding author's email address?

六出 2023-08-02

I would like to ask everyone, is it required to use the corresponding author's email when submitting a contribution?

狗拿喜 2023-08-01

3.13 Submission
6.25 Revision, reviewed by two reviewers
7.5 Revised submission
8.1 Accepted

lstm 2023-08-01

Why did I get rejected by the editor the day after I submitted, without any reason?

lstm 2023-08-01

I didn't have an external review, so I was directly rejected. I got rejected in just one day without any reason.

yzTeng 2023-07-31

Is there no submission portal for the EM system? I submitted my contribution on the official website system.

lstm 2023-07-31

To the author's submission guidelines

yzTeng 2023-07-31

May I ask why there is no submission entrance in the submission system? There is no "submit" button, but there is a "production" option, and I'm not sure what it is for.

lstm 2023-07-30

Where are we now?

ZYZ0000 2023-07-27

I submitted on March 8th, and on May 18th, it became "1 reviewer report received". Since then, there has been no further progress...

hua12 2023-07-25

I have now changed from "1 reviewer report received" to "under review," and I don't know why.

ZYZ0000 2023-07-25

I submitted it on March 8th, received one reviewer report on May 18th, and then it hasn't been touched since...

小树苗 2023-07-24

Just invested, recording the process.

wuahsnd 2023-07-22

Where did you see this? I have always seen mine on the official website as peer review.

wuahsnd 2023-07-22

Where else can I see the status besides on the official website? The EM system doesn't have anything. It has been three months since I submitted. I became a peer reviewer on the day of submission, but there has been no change in three months.

奕成 2023-07-19

Hello, no updates yet, just like you.

JK1996 2023-07-18

The review report that was submitted at the beginning of April has been the only one received so far, and it has been ongoing for 3 months now. So annoying.

hua12 2023-07-14

Excuse me, are you referring to the status of the official website submission portal query? It has been consistently showing "peer review" for me, but when I inquired via email, the editor mentioned that it is currently in the status of editor review. However, the status on my end hasn't changed.

求老天给一个sci 2023-07-13

There will be a change. There is a position on the right side. Do not click "View submission details". You can see a more accurate status just to the right of it.

hua12 2023-07-13

Excuse me, has your status been updated now? I am also like this.

hua12 2023-07-13

Has your current status changed?

hua12 2023-07-13

The text translates to: "There are two 'reviewer agrees' in the status display. Shouldn't I receive two 'review received' messages? However, I only received one. When I emailed the editor, they said it has reached the editorial decision stage. Is this normal?"

hua12 2023-07-13

Is there a change in status from the review process to the editorial decision?