Verified Reviews - NEURAL NETWORKS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

山和水 2023-08-08

May I ask if after submission, all authors need to confirm before entering the "with editor" stage?

山和水 2023-08-08

Do all authors need to confirm their submission in order to enter the "with editor" stage?

Mushui 2023-08-07

The first trial hasn't come out yet, is this slow?
Submitted on 5.28
With editor on 6.1
Under review on 6.8
Under review on 7.8
Under review on 7.19

Mr.Sandwich 2023-08-06

It is indeed slow to reach the stage of submission after casting the vote.

八个核桃 2023-08-05

It has been over a month, and it is still submitted to the journal.

暮雨天明 2023-08-03

Why is the second review so slow? I submitted for the second review, and the editor took over a month to invite, after I reminded them it changed to "with editor". Then it took another half month to send for external review, and now another month has passed.

Keeny 2023-08-02

7.2-8.2 RRC has been stuck for a month.

Boobooboo 2023-08-02

Is there anyone who can guide me on how to track the status of this journal? I remember receiving a website link regarding the status of the journal, which included information about reviewers and such, but I can't find it anymore...

lotya 2023-08-01

I have come to update my status again. Returned for revision on 7.22. Editor invited on 7.25. Under review on 7.31.

Mr.Sandwich 2023-07-31

It has been twenty days already, and I am still an invited editor.

QChandler 2023-07-29

Hey buddy, have you finished your RRC?

lleehnz 2023-07-28

Hasn't it been two months since the submission? The reviewer just started reviewing, how unlucky.

正未搁浅 2023-07-28

Mm, thank you very much for your detailed response. Now we can only wait, there's no other solution. Hopefully, both of us can smoothly accept it!

lotya 2023-07-27

In most cases, it is sent back to the original reviewer. However, there is a small probability that the original reviewer may refuse to review the manuscript again. For example, this journal requires at least three reviewers to provide feedback, but if two reviewers decline, the editor will invite a new reviewer. This situation is quite unlucky. However, NN should have a minimum of two reviewers, so the probability of inviting a new reviewer is low.

正未搁浅 2023-07-27

Hmm, well, we're about the same then. I also have a total of more than 20 suggestions. It turns out that this journal only has the opportunity to revise and reconsider. The main issue is that my editor's invitation status has been over half a month, and I'm not sure why it's taking so long now. Normally, this would be sent to the original reviewers!

lotya 2023-07-27

4 reviewers each with 5 comments, right? It's for revision and reconsideration. This journal does not have minor or major revisions. I submitted it the day before yesterday, it was with the editor yesterday, and today the editor invited me, but it hasn't changed to "under review" yet.

正未搁浅 2023-07-27

Classmate, I want to ask you how many comments did these four reviewers give you in total? I am also one of the four reviewers, and I feel that the comments are acceptable. I was given the instruction to revise and reconsider (not for nn letter). I wanted to ask if you are in the same situation as well. I submitted it almost 20 days ago and it is still "editor invited". The second review is taking so long. Has your status changed to "under review"?

lotya 2023-07-27

This journal is fast. The official website says an average of 9.7 weeks, and I received the first review result in 10 weeks. There were 4 reviewers, and their comments were quite positive. The editor gave me revisions, mainly focusing on improving the language and introduction section. I went back to work on it a few days ago.

QChandler 2023-07-26

It seems that a new reviewer has accepted it.

pandaandyy 2023-07-23

Jul 22, 2023: Submitted to Journal
Jul 23, 2023: Editor Invited
Aug 06, 2023: Under Review

lleehnz 2023-07-22

2023-07-22 under review

skkkkkkkkkk 2023-07-19

Just wanted to ask, how long did the "with editor" last?

skkkkkkkkkk 2023-07-18

2023/7/18 With Editor I don't know if it will be rejected. Nervous.

freenuero 2023-07-16

Is this opinion a revision or even worse than a revision? (Not for an nn letter)

skkkkkkkkkk 2023-07-16

Hello, may I ask if I can add you as a friend? I would like to discuss some questions regarding the submission of Neural Networks. I have also submitted one.

正未搁浅 2023-07-16

Classmate, you are so fast! How many reviewers are you? After making the modifications, do you send them all back to the original reviewer? I just finished making revisions and submitted my work. There are four reviewers, I wonder if I can be as lucky as you and get accepted directly. I envy you so much!

Table-B 2023-07-16

May I ask how long it takes to publish after receiving, and if there is a dio number?

Table-B 2023-07-16

Posted in early May of the 23rd year, returned for major revisions in early June, submitted after revisions on June 21st, and accepted on July 15th. I would like to ask when this journal will be published with a dio number, as I need it for scholarship evaluation.

ReggieZhang 2023-07-14

The Japanese person I first voted for, then the repetition rate was too high, so I checked it myself and found it to be 31%. Then I made some changes and lowered it to 17%, and I voted again for Deliang Wang.

accept西柚 2023-07-13

May I ask what is the acceptable limit for the first submission regarding the control of repetition rate?

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started