kfc-e 2023-08-09

Did you get the results yet?

kfc-e 2023-08-09

May I ask if his status is under review?

kfc-e 2023-08-09

On the day of submission, with the editor, one day later the status did not change but the date changed, and it continued for 5 days.

小奎哥2021 2023-08-01

It has been over two months, and there has been no response. I do not recommend submitting to this journal.

Mooyu 2023-07-26

6.19 submit
6.21 with editor until now (7.26)
It's really slow.

小奎哥2021 2023-07-01

It has been one month already, still with the editor.

爱吃橙子的t k 2023-05-28

Is there any update on the status?

八爪鱼的高跟鞋 2023-05-08

I submitted it in early March and have been with the editor for two months. Today, I sent an email to urge them. I don't know if it will be rejected directly.

爱吃橙子的t k 2023-05-05

May I ask if it's still under review?

爱吃橙子的t k 2023-05-05

May I ask if it has been under review for three months continuously?

miserablee 2023-04-30

I have also been for a month. Are you for two months or with an editor?

Chaney 2023-04-29

Another month has passed.

吕海翔 2023-04-24

Posted on March 22nd, still with editor.

Chaney 2023-03-29

Currently still With Editor.

阿系好 2023-03-21

You can check the status of your manuscript through the following methods (provide the manuscript number):
Hotline: 86-10-85208780
Service Email: support_chinese@elsevier.com
Online Chat: https://cn.service.elsevier.com/app/chat/chat_launch/supporthub/publishing/
WeChat Support: Follow '爱思唯尔科研出版服务' official account on WeChat, and contact us through the 'Journal Services - Manual Submission Assistance' in the menu bar.
Author Service Center: https://service.elsevier.com/app/home/supporthub/publishing/

阿系好 2023-03-21

2022.11.25 - Submission
2022.11.29 - Query with editor
2022.12.30 - Minor revision
2023.01.17 - Major revision
2023.03.21 - Acceptance
Hope it gets better and better.

已注销 2023-03-06

Already submitted for nearly four weeks, still With editor, very slow.

shine 2023-02-23

It has been three months, and the first review comments have not yet returned. It's really beyond expectation. Those who are anxious to graduate will be extremely worried.

shine 2023-02-23

2022-12-31 Posting
2023-02-23 Result unknown
So, you mean the first review period is not 3.4 weeks, right? It has been almost three months, and there is no news at all. It's really frustrating, there is no sign of progress while I'm in a hurry to graduate.

zero_lzy 2023-02-20

I really have no strength to complain.

Jeff 2023-02-04

2023.01.30 submit
2023.02.04 with editor
2023.02.08 under review
2023.02.15 First reviewer completed the review, other reviewers have not confirmed the acceptance of the review
2023.02.26 Same as above

玩的醒 2023-01-10

Hahaha, honestly, I'm just here to see you guys vent.

拉粑粑小魔仙 2022-12-27

The zoning of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is really arbitrary. Just two days ago, it was in the second zone, but after being criticized online, it quickly changed to the first zone overnight. Haha, interesting. Its credibility is completely lost.

Chaney 2022-10-19

2022.10.06 submitted
2022.10.07 with editor
Unknown...

yangdl1023 2022-09-04

After submission, the initial review takes 3 months, and after revision, it takes another 3 months to be accepted.

FeifeiXin 2022-08-31

May I ask, does the original poster have any updates? How long until there are changes?

12daee14aweqw 2022-05-31

5.23 submitted a review, but there has been no response for over a week.

本多 2022-04-25

Not all domestic journals operate like this, and they have all changed from four regions to one.

Dogking122 2022-04-07

How long will it take for review?

penguin 2022-04-01

To be fair, this journal is well-known for its connections. It's only natural for it to be in the second-tier category. It publishes 100 articles a year, mostly reviews, and most of them are from insiders who are part of the circle. There are only a limited number of first-tier journals, and this kind of journal occupying a spot in the first-tier category makes it more difficult for others to submit their manuscripts. It's not a pretty sight. Furthermore, its sister journal "Materials Today" is also the same. If a non-connected group has decent manuscripts, they usually choose to submit them to journals like AM, AFM, AEM. Look at "Angew" and "JACS," their publication volume is over 2000, and even "Nano Energy" has a publication volume of over 1000. The proportion of reviews is also less than 10%. I don't understand what people are complaining about regarding this journal. I suspect those who complain are the ones who have been rejected by this journal before.