博_L 2023-04-26

How come you're everywhere, you asshole?

HELLOHEL 2023-02-14

On the one hand, I can't hit my own shots, and on the other hand, I mock the magazine's content. Who really has the problem?

David zhou 2023-02-04

It just looks like good quality, but if you carefully read the content, you will realize that most of it is nonsense, let alone innovation. There is a reason why foreigners don't invest.

KKK 2023-01-08

The impact factor is indeed a bit inflated, but the quality of the articles in the field of botany is still good.

Yousi 2022-12-25

Hahaha...
I know I'm cheating, you also know I'm cheating, and I also know you know I'm cheating. But I still cheat.
Not only do I cheat, but I also act like I'm innocent and don't let you guys accuse me of cheating.

林夕 2022-12-23

I browsed through recent publications.

There are 8 research articles and 12 reviews. There are also 8 articles listed as "in-press" without clear indications, but upon closer examination, these eight articles are not research articles.

Out of the 28 articles, only 8 are research articles, which is less than 30%. Is this a reputable journal? I don't believe it! They prioritize impact factor over quality! If they remove these tricks and eliminate biased support, this garbage would not even be worth five points.

林夕 2022-12-23

All the people who are making comments are Chinese. Almost all the articles posted by foreigners are either invitation for review or minireview. They are also making great efforts to lower the proportion of Chinese people!

林夕 2022-12-23

Smile.