Verified Reviews - MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

lliikkee 2023-03-20

Submission in February, minor revisions given in late April, the date "under review" changed once in between, possibly because the reviewer I found did not review it and I had to find another one. Accepted for publication the day after revisions were made. Overall, the editing process was very fast.

li118 2022-10-21

April 28th Submission, June 15th Revision, September 12th Response, October 19th Accept. The reviewers are professional and friendly, and the review speed is acceptable.

jhgduf 2022-09-26

9.16 Xiao Xiuxiu's return.

小飞飞 2022-09-14

My evaluation is top-notch. I have been holding onto a small article for a year, and it has been submitted to 5 journals. Molecular Biology Reports is another journal recommended to me under their umbrella. After seeing its impact factor of 2.72 in the fourth quartile, I decided to give it a try with a positive mindset. Unexpectedly, the process was incredibly fast.

- Submitted on July 14th.
- First review around July 20th.
- Reviewer's comments and editor's suggestions on August 10th, followed by pre-acceptance and minor revisions.
- Revisions submitted on August 15th.
- Accepted on September 12th.

Traditional publishing does not require any page charges, and there is also an option to choose Open Access (OA) publishing. Currently, there are no requirements for WB original bands or additional repetitions.

Thank you to the editor and reviewer!

2022-09-04

31 May 2022 Submission
Probably 22.6.21 Under Review
Still waiting...

肥鱼 2021-12-29

May I ask, why does the MBR submission always show as incomplete?

肥鱼 2021-12-29

May I ask if the manuscript of BMC needs to have the figures and text uploaded separately? I submitted my manuscript without separating the figures and text, and I'm not sure why it keeps saying that my submission is incomplete.

sch125 2021-11-30

Excuse me, how long does it take to proofread online?

liusheng92 2021-11-25

Submitted on September 2nd, the revised version was returned by the end of October. A week later, it was sent back for further revisions due to some minor details that were not handled properly. After another round of revisions, it was accepted in a few days. However, the editor emphasized that magazines usually only undergo one round of revisions. Overall, the processing speed of the manuscript was relatively fast and the professionalism of the reviewers was also strong.

sch125 2021-10-28

I have made the modifications and returned. Can you share your submission schedule with me? Approximately?

芒果味儿的 2021-10-21

Submitted at the end of August, received feedback in mid-September for minor revisions. Revised and returned in early October, received feedback that the language quality of the article was not high and needed polishing. After polishing, uploaded again and received acceptance notification two days later. Overall, the process was quite fast! The feedback was prompt, but my own feedback was a bit slow. If I had been faster, it is estimated that it could have been accepted in September.

Ding12345 2021-10-20

Excuse me, has there been any news about your article?

sch125 2021-09-28

30 Aug 2021 Post
20 Sep 2021 Under Review
I wonder how much longer I have to wait.

今天被拒稿了嘛 2021-02-05

Hello, I want to ask how your investment turned out. Was it easy to win? And how long is the review cycle?

今天被拒稿了嘛 2021-02-05

Hello, I would like to ask how did your investment turn out? Was it easy to succeed? Did it take a long time?

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started