lanlanwater 2023-07-08

How long did it take for the technical review to pass and the allocation of editing?

lanlanwater 2023-07-08

How long did it take from the technical review being approved to the allocation of the editor?

ig_frank 2023-06-29

The review process took a little over two months. After a few days of minor revisions, it was returned for further modifications and was accepted. It took about two weeks for it to be published online after being accepted.

loriwan 2023-04-17

3.15 Submit one review
3.23 Under review
4.12 Accepted directly

Anxin_ 2022-11-22

Submitted in April 2022, until now "6 Reviewer(s) invited," during the process, reminder emails have been sent without any response. A withdrawal letter has already been sent, unsure if there will be a reply. I must have been out of my mind to submit to you.

垚垚~ 2022-10-16

How long after acceptance will it be published?

baobao12 2022-10-05

I also didn't receive any updates for most of the year, and when I requested the manuscript, they just made me wait longer. However, they promptly handled the withdrawal of the submission.

Anxin_ 2022-10-01

Submitted in April, it has been 6 months already, and it is still "6 reviewer(s) invited". During this period, I have sent reminders and withdrawal letters, but there has been no response. Come on, kill me and give the magazine some excitement!

hbzyydx 2022-08-27

Very well, I took a look at the forum, and it's all about not being able to invite reviewers. Blame me, blame me, I believed you without understanding it clearly. Damn it.

hbzyydx 2022-08-27

The child is really drunk! Starting from mid-May, they started inviting reviewers, but haven't been able to invite any, and they haven't re-invited either. "5 reviewer(s) invited" has been going on for over three months!!! What are they doing? They have sent 5 withdrawal emails one after another and have never received a reply. During the same period, I submitted to another journal with the same system, and they also couldn't invite reviewers, but the editor kept updating the invitation information, and now they are in the second round of review. This journal is really irresponsible!!!

wlshaw 2022-05-28

Overview
Except for the first review, all other steps in the journal process were quick.
The day after submission, the editor provided feedback that there was no statement of data availability in the manuscript. After supplementing this information, it was quickly sent for review.
The first review took 5 months, with two reviewers providing very few and positive comments, totaling 8. The editor requested major revisions, which took three months to complete. It only took two days to resubmit.
The second review took two weeks, and after about another week, the paper was directly accepted.
The journal generally has a long one-week cycle.

meiyounicheng123 2021-04-27

Both the editors and reviewers are good, with a low self-citation rate. The impact factor is steadily increasing, making it a promising journal.

30岁少年 2021-02-28

The first SCI article, a review, was submitted over a month ago and received reviewer comments. The revisions required significant changes and there was a three-month revision period. Both editors provided similar and constructive feedback. I redesigned the figures and discussed according to their suggestions. After about two months, I sent the revised article back to the editorial department. It took nearly a month for the department to send an acceptance email. Half a month later, the article was published online. However, it was not open access, and no page fees were provided.