zzzzzaa 2023-08-08

May I ask what is the current status?

Smooth 2023-07-06

new submission status!! Half a month already, help!!

Smooth 2023-06-29

Excuse me, experts, what does "new submission" mean for this journal? It has been a week and it has been in this status consistently.

zaoribiye 2023-06-12

Do you have any friends whose paper status is "editor declined invitation"?

zaoribiye 2023-06-12

Is there any friend whose paper status is "editor declined invitation"?

wang47 2023-06-05

Is there a proofreading process after being hired?

wang47 2023-06-05

Is there a proofreading process after being hired?

zaoribiye 2023-05-19

Have any friends recently submitted an application? Is it at the step of editor invitation?

lxj 2023-05-05

What happened in the end, mine also changed from "editor invited" to "editor assigned", and then changed back to "editor invited", it has been half a month already.

RLifan 2023-04-19

Hello, may I ask if you have ever experienced a change from "editor assigned" to "editor invited"?

RLifan 2023-04-19

Hello, may I ask if you have experienced the status change from "editor assigned" to "editor invited"? It has been going on for four days already. Thank you.

lay0924 2023-03-12

The rejection comments from this journal are really unreliable. After submitting, it went through a stage where it changed from "editor assigned" to "editor invited," and then after half a month, it changed back to "editor assigned." Anyway, what I saw was that it didn't even enter the "with editor" stage, and it took three months before the initial review. Then, the reasons for rejection given were: 1. Failure to provide an ethics review form, resulting in rejection of the review; 2. Insufficient data samples. Personally, I feel that these review comments are truly perfunctory and inexplicable. It seems like they just casually skimmed through the article, deliberately looked for some issues, and rejected it. Be cautious when submitting.

mameikun 2023-03-04

Recommended Journal, the first round of revisions took 2 months, the second round of major revisions took over 1 month, with a total duration of 7.5 months. Fortunately, the results were satisfactory and it was completed before graduation.

jyyjhg 2023-01-07

The journal is slow, but fortunately the outcome is good. It took nearly 9 months in total, with one major revision and one minor revision.

二郎险胜真菌 2022-12-28

Brother, how long does it take for this journal to be published?

努力发论文 2022-11-14

I submitted my article in July, but as of November, I still haven't found a reviewer. I asked the editor, who said either the previous invitations were rejected or not accepted. What's going on?

xiaoliaikeyan 2022-08-20

Posted on March 8, 2022, the official review process began in May and went through a major revision, grammar corrections, and minor edits. On August 19th, the revised version was submitted again, and the editor notified acceptance. After a five-month submission journey, my first SCI paper has successfully concluded, marking a perfect end to my academic career.

xiaoliaikeyan 2022-08-02

On August 1st, the major revision was returned. This time, it was given to the minor revision. Two out of three reviewers had no comments and suggested acceptance. The other reviewer raised two suggestions, mainly to replace the images in the article with vector graphics. The reviewer mentioned that the images became blurry when enlarged. At that time, the images were conveniently captured after completing the experiment. Now it seems that the experiment needs to be conducted again. Looking forward to a direct pass this time.

xiaoliaikeyan 2022-06-30

2022-6-14 Major + additional (experimental) work, three reviewers have all provided some comments, significant revisions have been made in response, and the editor-in-chief has suggested grammar needs polishing.

这个这个这个 2022-06-14

The reviewing speed is surprisingly slow, and I don't know if it's because of the editor or the reviewers. Everyone can see for themselves.
05 Feb 2021 - AU - Submission Confirmation
08 Aug 2021 - Editor decision - Major Revision
The reviewing process took 6 months, and the email was not received in a timely manner. I only received it on the 23rd. However, the website status showed it was sent on the 8th.
There were two reviewers, one recognized the importance of the manuscript and had a positive view. The other suggested major revisions and had a negative view. I won't make any evaluations here.
27 Sep 2021 - Author Revision
I made careful revisions.
17 Jan 2022 - Editor Decision - Reject
After another nearly 4 months of review, one reviewer agreed to accept it, but the other claimed that we did not meet their requirements for adding experimental suggestions and rejected it. Then the editor made the decision to reject it. My boss heard about it and was almost furious. He wrote an appeal letter, but has not received a response to this day.
After nearly a year, they finally rejected the paper. I am truly speechless. Many other articles based on this manuscript have already been published. Of course, not in a journal from Springer. Having a status tracking system is definitely necessary.
This is my experience with submitting to this journal, and I hope it can be helpful for everyone. I will never touch this journal again in my lifetime.

彼岸花 2022-05-24

May I ask how your article is doing? I have submitted mine almost 2 months ago, and it is still in the "Editor Assigned" status. When can I expect it to be reviewed?

RAI 2022-05-04

Brother, I can't download the template now. Do you have the template? Can you please forward it to me? Thank you very much! 1055224056qq

xiaoliaikeyan 2022-04-18

March 17, 2022 post. It briefly showed the editing status in between, then remained in the "under review" status for a few days. Now it has changed to "Reviewers Assigned", and I don't know when it will be sent for external review.

赤甲 2022-03-15

My review only has one reviewer.

ChakaBengMing 2022-03-10

I want to ask, how many reviewers are there?

赤甲 2022-01-31

Posted on November 7th, minor revisions on January 17th. Although the feedback for the revisions wasn't particularly professional, it was still on point. Accepted on January 30th, personally, it felt very fast (compared to previous submissions).

mzr 2021-10-26

Is there no "editor assigned" status?

hy97 2021-10-06

5.13 Manuscript Submitted
6.23 Under review
7.26 Major revision
8.23 Under review
9.27 Accept
The initial review process was slow, but after a major revision and another round of minor revisions, the manuscript was accepted.
The journal is good, with a review process of four months, which is within an acceptable range. The reviewers and editors are industry experts and provided professional feedback.

小黄三爷 2021-02-20

I have been submitting it for four months, and it has been in the hands of two editors. One editor had a positive opinion and suggested some modifications, while the other editor didn't understand it at all and provided a bunch of irrelevant opinions. After a whole four and a half months, I've decided to no longer submit it.