纳迪尔 2023-07-09

An article, which I had originally planned to give up on, had been rejected three times before. I submitted it to this journal and, of course, made extensive revisions based on the comments from the previous rejections. After about 40 days, I received minor revisions. The reviewer provided very constructive comments, which I followed and explained in detail during the revision process. After about 20 days, it was accepted. The current status is "in preparation," and it has been 10 days already. The post-processing time may be slightly longer.

Energy Sto 321 2023-03-15

Applied in December, rejected in March. One reviewer gave some random comments and then rejected it. Too slow, wasted time.

碳水脑袋 2023-01-14

20221101, submit to MACO
20221203, minor revisions and additional experimental data
20221218, resubmit
20230109, minor revisions
20230111, resubmit after modifications
20230113, accepted
The review process was quite fast, thanks to a very responsible reviewer. I am greatly thankful and have benefited greatly. It is really fortunate to have such a result for my first article. I am happy!

小博 2023-01-09

This journal really can't afford to be hurt. I submitted it on December 15, 2022, and it immediately showed "under review" on the same day, which made me very happy. However, on January 9, 2023, I received an email saying sorry, it was rejected. I have to submit the first draft of my doctoral thesis in March next year, and now I feel frustrated. What level do these journals really require to accept articles?

y伊伊 2022-10-07

Excuse me, is there a result yet?

y伊伊 2022-10-07

I heard that this journal is very fast, like around one month or so. How come there is still such a situation? It's really worrying.

y伊伊 2022-10-07

May I ask if there are any recommended editing agencies for modifying the language in journal submissions? Is there a fee for the editing service, or should I make language improvements on my own?

2Nb 2022-08-31

8.31 under review translates to "8.31 is currently being reviewed."

2Nb 2022-08-10

8.10 under review.

2Nb 2022-08-07

8.3 under review

2Nb 2022-08-07

I will also record it down, hoping for a good outcome.

森林里的小刺猬 2022-07-15

Hello, may I ask how much is the layout fee for this journal? Is it mandatory to pay?

lidh 2022-07-13

The review speed is fast, and the manuscript was sent for review on the same day of submission. It took one month to receive the revision comments. After the revision, the reviewer took a long time to respond. After urging, the second round of review comments was quickly returned. After the revision, it was immediately accepted. The online process was also very prompt. In conclusion, the efficiency of the editor is very high.

AA137435 2022-05-04

Do you have to share the data?

aijia 2022-04-11

The notification was sent quickly, but it has been a long time since receiving it without any updates. It has been about a month with no news. If you need a DOI number, it is best to think carefully.

阿伟喂喂喂 2022-04-07

Hello, can you please tell me the specific timeline? I just submitted to this journal and I am not familiar with the progress. Thank you.

aijia 2022-03-20

This journal really has a very fast review speed. I received the comments in less than a week, and after making minor revisions, the revised manuscript was accepted very quickly. The whole process took less than a month.

油条 2021-10-06

Posted on September 8, 2021, accepted on October 5, 2021. They want me to make revisions before November 4th.
I wrote an analysis of the corrosion situation in natural gas pipelines. I am not a materials expert. I only used a third-party inspection report from my engineering work, along with conducting an experiment soaking in an SRB solution to measure corrosion depth and including a scanning electron microscope photo. I personally think that I wrote the article from an outsider's perspective. I only analyzed the corrosion situation from an engineering standpoint using engineering data, and then conducted a pipeline safety evaluation from a quality engineering perspective.
I feel that as long as the amount of data is appropriate and the logic is rigorous, with mutually validating data or engineering guidance value, it can be accepted. The external expert only emphasized the need to improve the data and clarify any unclear points, and to avoid writing in the tone of an experimental report. There were no difficult opinions mentioned.

Salt Leon 2021-09-06

Generally, send the letter after one month.

Salt Leon 2021-09-06

Generally, one sends a letter per month.

AM123 2021-06-05

It has been under review for 2 weeks. I want to ask the guy on the 31st floor, how has the status of your article changed?

wjy 2021-03-30

I have been under review for more than 20 days. Why is that? What are the next steps?

xiaosheng 2021-02-16

Excuse me, how should I fill in the email format for submission? Is it different from the Aisweier system?