听戏 2023-07-26

The speed was very fast, submitted on June 12th, received the review comments on July 11th, returned the revised manuscript on July 25th, and accepted on July 26th. The speed was very fast, and it also had a great influence. I wish the journal continued to improve.

听戏 2023-07-09

Do you know how long it usually takes for this journal to reply with the review comments after under review?

CMJ 2023-06-24

How long does it take to send for review with the editor? Will it still show the "under review" status?

Fantasty 2023-03-22

Notified, the second trial will take 19 days.

Fantasty 2023-03-20

How long will it take to receive news after the major revision?

浮云 2023-01-16

Okay, it's been a week since I submitted it for review.

令狐克 2023-01-15

Has the original post been received?

令狐克 2023-01-15

Submitted, it's been a week with the editor. Does anyone know if this journal has a fast review process? Will the review status be displayed?

枫丹白露 2022-09-23

Last September, I switched from AFM to another company. I did one major revision and one minor revision before finally publishing it online by the end of November. The editor worked very quickly, and the suggestions made by the reviewer greatly helped improve the quality of the article.

MOE 2022-06-27

How long does it generally take for this journal with an editor?

哈哈 2022-04-27

The first review took about half a month, and the second review took less than 10 days. The editors and reviewers were very efficient, thumbs up! The last time it was this fast was for a minor revision in another journal. I just don't know how the Chinese Academy of Sciences categorizes journals. This upgraded version of a classic polymer journal is surprisingly in the third tier, when it used to be in the first tier and was very prestigious. I wonder what those people were thinking...

accept！！！ 2022-03-20

01.15 Submission
02.01 Feedback received, two reviewers, major revisions required
Additional experiments needed, thus requesting an extension for the deadline to submit revised version by 02.28
03.16 Acceptance
The journal's processing speed is very fast, thanks to the editor, and best wishes for continued success.

科研民工007 2022-03-04

The review speed of MRC can truly be described as astonishing. The qualification review for doctoral graduation is scheduled for next week, and it was accepted in a very timely manner.
Although this journal has been downgraded to a 3rd tier, it still has influence as an established journal in the field of polymer science. Here is a brief account of the submission process:
Submitted on January 16, 2022, received the first round of review comments on January 30, just two weeks!! Comrades, it really was only two weeks!! This speed is truly amazing.
Both reviewers recommended major revisions, but there were only nine issues that needed to be addressed, and two small experiments needed to be conducted. It happened to coincide with the Chinese New Year holiday, so I waited patiently for the school to reopen after two weeks, and then spent 4 days in the lab conducting experiments and revising the manuscript (February 22, 2022).
Accepted on March 4, 2022.

关灯吃面肝论文 2021-12-17

This year is the second time I submitted to MRC. Thank you. Following the progress of the previous work.
On November 11th, I submitted to Angew and suggested transferring to MRC one week later.
Transferred on November 18th.
Received review comments on December 9th, very fast, it only took three weeks, two reviewers made minor revisions, overall rating is 5%.
Replied to the comments on December 15th, because I was busy preparing for my major thesis graduation, I was a bit blind and delayed the minor revisions for a week.
Accepted on December 16th, the editor probably just glanced at it...
The whole process took 29 days. It was really fast...
For those in a hurry, you can choose it. It's really amazing.

关灯吃面肝论文 2021-10-29

4-28 - Submission
5-28 - Feedback, all three people provided positive feedback, given 21 days for revisions. Major revisions.
6-28 - Submitted revised manuscript. Added some experiments, two people suggested optimization for one of the tests. Also added one piece of data, took half a month to collect the data and another half to make revisions. Finally, wrote a letter to the editor requesting a one-week extension for revisions. The editor was easy to talk to.
Accepted in a few days. Afterwards, no longer involved.

xue-meimei 2021-08-09

I have been waiting for 4 days, and it has been under consideration all this time. I hope for good luck.